I don't know
if its Freudian, it was just a slip, but anyway if it was Freudian I have deeper issues.
If Freudian concepts are the discourse of choice, one wonders if the uncanny might be less germane to Hanson's operation than is the concept of unconscious intention.
Not exact matches
If they were persuaded by Marx in any fundamental way and began to interpret Freud in Marxist terms, they would no longer be
Freudians.
And he said» Oh yeah, my Christain faith,» A
Freudian slip
if there ever was one.
This was,
if anything, even farther from the truth about the special problem of the modern middle - class American woman than the
Freudian - type psychologizing, and even less helpful in offering her an understanding of it.
But her final opinion» anticipated by any reader accustomed to the fixed rails of
Freudian thought» seems at once trivial and untrue:
if a patient has long believed that his gender of rearing was in error and really wants this surgical operation, he and / or she best have it.
Over in psychology, a Skinnerian or a
Freudian unabashedly propounds his own school's thought as
if it were normative for the entire field.
and
if you choose to use psychology, why stick to the pervasive, anti-religous
freudian branch, and not adler or jung?
Since Darwin there are few professional biologists who are not Darwinians, and
if most psychologists no longer call themselves
Freudians, few doubt that there is an unconscious or that sexuality plays a big role in it.
As
if their relationship wasn't complex enough, there's also a trace of chemical imbalance between Crystal and Julian that occasionally takes a dip into
Freudian waters.
If that is the case, kudos to screenwriters Bob Fisher, Steve Faber, Sean Anders, and John Morris for opening this film up to
Freudian interpretations of the scene in which «dad» tries to convince «mom» and later his «son» to perform a sexual favor on a cop looking for a bribe, and let's not ignore the scene where the «son» goes back and forth between kissing his «sister» and his «mom.»
Benjamin H. Bratton's account of the reverse panopticon effect as «exhibitionism in bad faith» whereby «you know you are being watched but act as
if you aren't,» echoes the
Freudian account of the exhibitionist as the voyeur in disguise who acts out their own imagined viewing.
Maybe that was a
Freudian slip, but
if a Supreme Court justice uses a word, it should mean something.