Sentences with phrase «if i study all»

If you study the most successful YouTubers, you'll notice the sponsorships and advertisements they have in their video recordings.

She quotes 17 - year - old Riima Al - Sabbah: «If I study five hours a day, it would not be enough.

If you study Freud's model of the mind, you'll discover the Psychic Apparatus.

Even if studies found that the GMO soy that Ayyadurai talks about contained formaldehyde, the levels would need to be compared to those found in soybeans in the wild.

But if the studies asked whether the entrepreneurs had developed strategy, prioritized, calculated starting costs and planned cash flow, study participants would probably say yes.

If you study body language, you'll learn various elements of communication that might give you an indicator of what's going on with the other person.

And if you study them, you can figure out what it is, and you can learn and adopt their patterns and save yourself decades of trial and error.

We can ask ourselves if these studies will help investors beat the market.

By way of contrast, the release too readily embraces and extrapolates from the studies it characterizes as supporting the rulemaking, as if these studies were on point and above critique when in fact they are not.

If you study up it enough you will be able to raise your funds no matter if the rate is increasing or dropping.

«Basically if you study entrepreneurs, there is a misnomer:: People think that entrepreneurs take risk.

Their experiences, if studied carefully, teach bedrock methods and guiding principles for approaching business.

If you studied the skeletal remains you would see that the results are inconclusive.

If you studied science, including evolution theory yourself, it would be much easier for you to believe in it.

If you study the sacrifices the jews made in the temple, you see the symbolism of the lamb of God being slain and his blood covering the sins of the people.

If you study the history of religious writings, it becomes rather clear that it was MAN who created GOD in man's own image.

And Christian Scientists should up the ante in their war on medicine and make everyone know that everyone can cure disease like Jesus if they study study Mary Baker Eddy's book.

If you study this section of Deuteronomy it is rich in meaning.

If you study it you will see what I mean.

There are two main branches of Buddhism and if you study their development you will understand why some Buddhas are thin and why others are fat.

Third, if you studied history, you would realize that the South during that time period are still the same group of people that are Republicans today.

Actually BC — if you study this issue you will find room for an entirely different perspective.

«There's a lovely Hasidic story of a rabbi who always told his people that if they studied the Torah, it would put Scripture on their hearts.

If you studied it at all you'd know it isn't true.

And character, Hopewell provocatively proposed, is best grasped if studied in counterpoint with some mythic tale that «matches» a congregation's style, tone, and moral posture, the features of its character.

And if we study ancient history we find that today America mirror Rome right before it's fall.

Frankly, if you study history you know that ALL Super Powers eventually fall, and the journey down is a bloody mess.

But the answer will be much more satisfying if our study includes careful methods of analysis and interpretation, with due regard to the historical and literary contexts and the genre being used.

And if you study and understand it then you realize that their is no contradictions.

I bet if a study was done on the mothers of Aborted babies they would find the mothers were Liberals.

Indeed, it has sometimes seemed as if the study of Pauline and Johannine thought, in particular, might resolve itself into a study of religious eclecticism.

If you study Religion more you'll realize it is inherently violent because it is inherently insecure and is relegated to using threats and violence to keep people from asking too many questions.

If you study for yourself (not just listen to «experts»), the complexity of DNA, the fossil record, the lack of evidence for «the primordial ooze», you too will find evolution a most unsatisfying explanation of the scientific data around us.

If my studies of Whitehead and Russell are, as Lucas says, «intellectual biographies,» such an approach has very recently been given its greatest boost in Russell: The Journal of the Bertrand Russell Archives with the publication of Whitehead's «To the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge» 1 preceded by an analysis by Paul Delany of...

If the goal that makes a school «theological» is to understand God more truly, and if such understanding comes only indirectly through disciplined study of other «subject matters,» and if study of those subject matters leads to truer understanding of God only insofar as they comprise the Christian thing in their interconnectedness and not in isolation from one another, then clearly it is critically important to study them as elements of the Christian thing construed in some particular, concrete way.

If you studied to be a pastor, you would have more cogent arguments.

If you study the Joseph Smith History, he was looking for a church to belong to and would have been perfectly happy as a Methodist or Protestant, so he wasn't looking to start a new church he just wanted to know which was true, but when he prayed about which church was true it was then he received his answer.

If you study ancient and even recent history you will find this is certainly not the case.

If we study the history of economic theory, we can see that thought has played a very large role.

If you study the variety of views in the tripartite fold, you will find many contradictions.

And in fact, there is a good chance if you study with an open heart and open mind you will not want to take part in one either.

Furthermore, if you study and compare all of the instances in the Bible of demon possession, everybody always knows who is demon possessed.

First, suggests Ramsey, we can speak of the «will of God» in terms of belief and action if we study how people with Christian commitment have talked.

If you study and do your research you will find all of the people God Bless in the Bible lived very well.

If you study BASIC BIOLOGY, and BASIC PHYSICS, and go into the works of Darwin and Newton and Einstein with «preconceived notions» (which you got from bible brainwashing) then you «may come out as confused as when you went in.»

Many people hear this and think, «If studying the Bible leads to those conclusions, I don't want to study the Bible.»

If you study them all the Old Covenant Laws were based in Love to begin with.

The Bible if studied correctly answers a lot of questions, and leaves a few unanswered.

Paul van Buren was a disciple of Karl Barth, under whom he wrote his excellent doctoral dissertation on Calvin's teaching about Christ as the true life of men; Hamilton was an opponent of natural theology in all its forms, even if he studied at St Andrews under Donald Baillie — but it was the so - called «rico - orthodox» line which had attracted him, theologically; Altizer is a slightly different case.

To my mind it will not necessarily help us very much if we study Palestinian customs or the Jewish religious system.