Sentences with phrase «if qb»

Also if your QB is hit during the releas you lose a ton of accuracy and run the risk of being intercepted.

I'd personally be surprised if QB ever hit Steam, it's the harbinger of the «MS exclusive» moniker & I believe its appearance on PC is as much about pushing the new universal Win10 initiative as it is about grabbing some extra sales.

Only way a team trades up to 13 is if a QB falls.

That's good because if the QB continues to take this many shots, Air Force will need a lot of QBs.

If our QB situation was the same as we ended the season with, then no question about it.

Dominant 9 man + the improved run game we saw from last year = scary good offense IF our QB can deliver, which I won't rehash all the KB / TL / HJ debating.

Hamilton asked again if that QB would be Peters, he said it could be.

Of course, if a QB is somehow still there (I hear Mayfield might fall but I don't believe it), and some team is willing to give up multiple picks (not just swap a first and add a second) maybe you consider it.

Now, if its a qb that they think will fall, then staying put may be what they do.

He is trying to build a solid roster around what he views as a capable NFL starting QB to then be able to determine if that QB is what is holding the team back or not and settle that then.

If the Qb position becomes more competetive in the future we may see that.

If our QB faked the hand - off and passed it («play action»), it would also mean that the DE was already into the backfield, which made it that much easier to get pressure on the QB (although to be fair, Jimbo would run bootlegs to try to contain the rusher, although more often for the QB to pass it).

If your QB falls to you at five, say a Rosen, it'd be hard to pass up, though I do agree I would prefer the team to go another route.

While it would be great for the run game to have, say, a Phil Loadholt at Right Tackle, speed rushers would kill these maulers if the QB were to need more than 3 seconds in the pocket.

If the QB isn't performing well, we've seen the 9 man fronts that can shut down even an elite running game.

I guess it depends if our QB is throwing real footballs or little plastic ones.

If our QB is there at 2 then we have to take him.

If the QB they think is the BPA is still there at 5, then then yes, draft a QB.

You catch with your hips not with your jaw - But I guess if your a QB whose primary contributions to your team are smacking your gum super loud during the meetings you decide you want to show up for, well then I can see how a broke jaw might put a cramp in your style.

I guess if your a QB whose primary contributions to your team are smacking your gum super loud during the meetings you decide you want to show up for, well then I can see how a broke jaw might put a cramp in your style.

Sam Bradford didn't meet expectations based upon what the team gave up for him, so if any QB should anxed, it's him.

If the QB can't rid of the ball fast enough, we're bound to give up sacks.

But if the QB turns out to be really really good (Sam Darnold) then they may have the position settled for years.

If a QB rated higher than your 3rd round draft pick is still on the board, who you think will develop in your system, take him in the 3rd round, but not higher.

If the QB is a running threat, the offense can always force safeties to make tackles.

If a QB is sitting there at # 8, it would mean Buffalo only giving up 12 & 65.

If QB is the most important position on the roster and you think you have the right QB of the future, then you don't risk screwing that up for a first rounder you won't be using to get the right QB of the future.

If the QB they want is gone, and they think Nelson is the best player standing, then they should take him.

One has to ask, if all QBs seem to run into big hits maybe it's not them running into them, but more often than not, lack of decent o - line play set them up to get hit big.

If QBs go with the first 3 picks Denver might contemplate a Bears like move up one spot to secure their QB of the future, at the cost of a valuable draft pick.

The only way I see it is if QBs go 1 - 4, no one will trade up for Barkley and Elway straight up panics.

So if QBs can't read more than three guys, and if defenses are perhaps slowly beginning to figure out what it takes to address the RPO, where do things go from here?

If both QBs do in fact play, then Oregon will be at least double - digit favorites.

Not exact matches

If teams could get access to the full feed of game cameras, they could give QBs virtual run - throughs of past real games, even if there was nobody on the field wearing a 360 camerIf teams could get access to the full feed of game cameras, they could give QBs virtual run - throughs of past real games, even if there was nobody on the field wearing a 360 camerif there was nobody on the field wearing a 360 camera.

If getting a top QB is our current draft strategy, the strategy shouldn't change due to this announcement.

At the end of the day, if you want to built a winning team, you draft guys that can rush the QB.

If the guy they want is gone, how would you feel if they stayed put and did not draft a QB earlIf the guy they want is gone, how would you feel if they stayed put and did not draft a QB earlif they stayed put and did not draft a QB early?

If they are going to draft a QB and want him to grow into the role, having Dez and Landry to toss it up to could make a rookie QB much more comfortable.

If we're talking inside zone read, if the end crashes the linebacker had better play scrape exchange because the QB will pull and run for 20 yards if both the DE and LB go insidIf we're talking inside zone read, if the end crashes the linebacker had better play scrape exchange because the QB will pull and run for 20 yards if both the DE and LB go insidif the end crashes the linebacker had better play scrape exchange because the QB will pull and run for 20 yards if both the DE and LB go insidif both the DE and LB go inside.

Even if you pick correctly, you end up being the Colts (great QB, lousy team).

Jets: If Broncos don't get a QB they'll draft a QB unless they win the Kirk Cousins sweekpstakes.

If a trade back happens and we are out of the QB / Saquon / Nelson range he's the O - Lineman I want.

He may not have led the league, but I would argue he was able to produce more that season than most other WRs in the league if faced with the same QB and coverage.

I feel the fan base may be let down if we walk away with none of the top 4 Qbs.

If the Browns were smart (lol) and were fine with 3 of the top QBs, they could take Barkley # 1 overall and let one of the QBs fall to them at 4.

«Our receivers — once their feet stop moving, we can snap the ball because if they're shuffling, it's illegal procedure and we can't do that,» says Huskers QB Noah Vedral, who transferred to Lincoln after spending his freshman year at UCF.

«Ted Thompson wouldn't, even if he could... he would be admitting «I was wrong (re: drafting a bad QB in round 1 the previous year)» but he should.

I'm wondering if we were playing against teams at the best times (injured qb's, rb's, or wr's) often or were teams scoring less against us compared to other teams.

I'm hoping Rush is enough of a qb to push Dak if not entirely push him out of the starting spot if he cant catch up in the off season.

It's funny, but I think all 5 of the top mentioned QB's come off the board before pick 12 if Buffalo makes no moves.