If air masses rose adiabatically, there wouldn't be lightning and thunder.
If the air mass sinks low enough, the air at higher altitudes becomes warmer than at lower altitudes, producing a temperature inversion.
Not exact matches
If successful, Porter will not only give
Air Canada a real run for its money, but it will be responsible for the fastest expansion of any form of
mass transportation Toronto will see for years to come.
But imagine
if, instead of Newton's second law of motion, which describes the relationship between an object's
mass and the amount of force needed to accelerate it, we only had reams of data related to throwing various objects into the
air.
For a rope cloud to form, the leading edge of the cold
air mass must be advancing straight and steady, which can happen only
if it is flowing over a smooth, flat surface like the ocean.
As a result, two objects dropped on Earth's surface should accelerate at the same rate (neglecting
air resistance), even
if they have different
masses or are made of different materials.
The upward trajectory of the
air gives shape to the towering cumulonimbus clouds, and
if the
air is heavily laden with water vapor, it adds
mass to the clouds, as well.
This causes the engine to shut down quickly and smoothly without any «shuddering» that might happen
if the engine continued to take in and compress
air as the rotating
mass comes to a rest.
If a smaller
mass of
air has to pass through the evaporator, less energy ends up in the refrigerant liquid, so the evaporator cools down faster.
If a larger
mass of warm
air has to pass through it, more energy is transferred, through the evaporator's fins (so that even the evaporator's design and, in particular, its exchange surface play an important part) from the
air to the liquid refrigerant allowed inside it by the TEV or orifice tube so it expands more and, along with the absolute pressure inside the evaporator, the refrigerant's vapor superheat (the delta between the boiling point of the fluid at a certain absolute pressure and the temperature of the vapour) increases, since after expanding into saturated vapour, it has enough time to catch enough heat to warm up further by vaporizing the remaining liquid (an important property of a superheated vapour is that no fluid in the liquid state is carried around by the vapour, unlike with saturated vapour).
Here's a situation I encounter quite often During diagnosis, I want to determine
if the
mass air flow sensor (s)[MAF (s)-RSB- is / are healthy.
Any time the battery is disconnected the computer will reset idle control to when the car is new and may stall
if the throttle body and idle control valve and
mass air sensor
if equipped is dirty and need to...
The first thing to try is to disconnect the
mass air sensor and drive it to see
if the hesitation is still there.
If hesitation is gone then replace the mass air sensor and drive to see if hesitation has.
If hesitation is gone then replace the
mass air sensor and drive to see
if hesitation has.
if hesitation has...
If your car jerks while the vehicle is in gear, the issues could be caused by a
mass air flow sensor (https://www.yourmechanic.com/article/what-does-the-
mass-airflow-sensor-do), O2 sensor or...
However, other mechanical systems that are monitored can also contribute to the problem
If the car is slow to accelerate and seems to stumble when you drive, that's more indicative of a dirty
mass air flow sensor or clogged fuel injectors.
This can be causes by the
mass air flow sensor running the engine lean or
if you do not have a flex fuel vehicle then running a...
However,
if all cylinders are affected, you would test, in turn: the fuel pressure regulator, fuel pump pressure, check for a clogged fuel filter, vacuum leak, faulty oxygen sensor (s) and faulty
mass air flow sensor.
When a patient has problems breathing or is coughing, the x-rays are very helpful in determining
if there is fluid,
air, or a
mass that may be compromising the lungs, resulting in difficulty breathing or coughing, in addition to determining
if the heart is enlarged.
And how much cleaner would the
air be
if more individuals used
mass transit, walked or biked?
A business model that prices
air travel as a last resort rather than as
mass transport could succeed in spite of eco-taxes — but only
if there is a level playing field.
One might think that more precipitation would then lead to more snowfall in regions such as the Sierra Nevada, which gets
air masses saturated with oceanic moisture, but with the increasing temperatures at altitude, the precipitation is as rain, or
if as snow, doesn't last as long.
The point isn't a «perpetual increase in atmospheric pressure» — that's a misnomer —
if you consider the
MASS of the atmosphere that is continuously «pumped» from cold
air to hot
air to cold
air again, high up in the atmosphere — that creates «potential energy» from the kinetic energy of the convection — adiabatic expansion of the atmosphere is the result — the adiabatic compression occurs on the return trip of the previously warmed (from radiative energy)
air as it completes the «cycle» as it comes back down!
If we look at the temperature profiles of the previous example, the effects of warming and cooling on the respective
air masses are very different.
Which
air mass would move over the UK
if pressure was high over Scandinavia and there are surface winds from the east?
If you put the condenser in a garage, attic (as shown above), or other space, it's now connected to a finite
mass of
air.
If you release smoke into the
air, it doesn't all stay together in one
mass, but mixes and disperses.
If that CO2 sinks through a
mass like water, then why does it magically float in the
air, in fact, rising.
If it does sink through the
mass of water, then that CO2 in the
air should just drop like a stone to the surface of the Planet.
It can't be heating the
air, far too little thermal
mass,
if it was heating the
air we'd all be on fire.
While it's true that thick, beefy bodies of material can soak up heat during the day and then radiate that heat again when the
air is cooler, this principle doesn't work
if the thermal
mass isn't insulated.
The possible link between Arctic change and mid-latitude weather is the focus of the conference, and even
if the researchers don't have all the answers yet, there is an emerging consensus that melting Arctic sea ice is fundamentally changing the the way
air masses and weather systems whirl around the Northern Hemisphere.
This may be me advertising my ignorance but
if the OHC is of interest as against the SST why do we use a parameter of «global temperature» which is an amalgam of SST and
air temperature over land rather than a total heat content or a temperature normalised say for
mass or thermal density (normalise to the properties of water say)?
I mean that
if column of meter square by 10 meters high of liquid
air [Oxygen and Nitrogen] it has same
mass as column
air meter square which goes from Earth surface to edge of space.
Non-incremental progress («breakthroughs») and sharp price declines may occur with printed («nano») solar panels,
air (CO2) capture devices, and new battery technologies — though probably only
if we subsidize their
mass manufacture and deployment.
If the jet stream dips south, for example, it takes the colder
air masses with it.
Winds quickly drive CO2 away from the sunny regions where it is being released so it is easy to envisage Henry's Law applying in a particular location but
if the CO2 rich
air is being constantly removed then more outgassing can then occur in the same region and it is not hard to envisage an accumulation of CO2 downwind or over land
masses where the wind flow slows down.
My memory of basic meteorology is that thunderstorms require hot and cold
air masses to form, which I suppose would cause hail to not be expected very near the eye of a hurricane even
if the hurricane was pushing into a cold
air mass.