Sentences with phrase «if answer to»

If the answer to question 2 is yes, is the impairment of the bodily function serious.

In MacIssac, if the answer to the first question had been that the Act had guaranteed the right of way shown on the plan, free from a right of way over the dip, it would normally have triggered issues rectification, compensation and allocation of loss under the Act.

If the answer to the previous question is Yes: how would someone from outside of the United States authorize someone residing in the United States to send a DMCA takedown notice on their behalf?

If the answer to this question is negligence by another individual or company, then the concept of wrongful death comes into play.

Feel free to give us a call if the answer to this frequently asked question didn't answer your question or brought some other issue to mind that you would like to speak to us about.

If the answer to question 1 is yes, is section 1 of the proposal, which extends capacity to marry to persons of the same sex, consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

If the answer to the question is «hinder» then our guidelines state that it is not permitted.

If the answer to this question depends on the state, then I'm interested in a criminal lawsuit in Arkansas.

Speaking of Amazon, which many cloud software vendors use to host data, if the answer to any of the above is «Amazon takes care of it,» which of Amazon's many security options has the company elected to employ?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, we may have an excellent defense against your DWI charges.

If the answer to each question was in the affirmative, then there had to be a strong presumption that any alterations in the control order strengthening the restrictions were unnecessary.

If the answer to be accepted is that this «Initiatives» text was not intended to deal with the unaffordable legal services problem, then what published law society text describing operative programs does?

Asking those questions and understanding which elements are critical to your use case is really helpful and if the answer to those questions is yes, then certainly an AI solution may be right for you.

If the answer to any of the aforementioned is «yes,» you may be entitled to a settlement.

If the answer to either of these questions is yes, Illinois courts are likely to enforce a restrictive covenant.

If the answer to any of these questions is no, you need to update the strategy surrounding your online presence.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, should conditions or restrictions be imposed on the maintenance of the rights and freedoms to be derived from EU citizenship?

If the answer to this question is yes, proceed with caution.

«If the answer to that is yes, which would sure be convenient, then we just need to go about the simple business of figuring out how to compensate it.»

You see... it does seem as if the answer to the above question is yes.

4 If the answer to 2 is yes, then which model parameter (s) predominate to cause the cooling?

3 If the answer to 2 is no, then the models are unrealistic and, therefore, invalid.

If the answer to either of these questions is yes, Mann's work is doomed.

Anyway, my experience with Judith and her fellow «skeptics» is that they will never feel that they have to concede a point — no matter if the answer to a particular question exposes a logical inconsistency — they will just spin and go about their merry way.

If the answer to the above question is no, then why?

The subtle difference between these questions is that if the answer to the second question is «yes», then whenever heat is being trapped by an object, the object's temperature will rise; whereas a «yes» answer to the first question only implies that the «trapping of heat» may cause a temperature rise, not that it must.

These are reasonable questions to ask and if the answer to this was «yes», then of course we would look to our governments to do something about it.

If the answer to the first question is yes or if the answer to the second is no, the global warming debate becomes merely interesting, with very few real political consequences.

If the answer to all of these is «no» (and that is clearly the only honest answer to all of them), then we have to agree that two of the world's top climatologist essentially said that we are now completely and utterly beyond hope.

If the answer to all of the above is «yes,» then you will probably want to check out our more advanced HTSYAO courses.

If the answer to both those questions is yes then you will be pleased to hear that Exor Studios have created a unique fusion of these two genres and produced Sci - fi hybrid X-morph: Defence.

If the answer to any of these questions is yes, GAME might have the answer.

If the answer to some of those questions was yes, then you're going to love Loot & Legends.

If the answer to these questions is «yes,» then we proceed and move forward.

If the answer to any of the above is «yes,» then this is probably the game for you.

If the answer to the above question is «yes», then EA have balls.

If your answer to the question «What makes this bit of content fun, unique, and worth my time and money?»

If the answer to any of those is «Yeah!»

If your answer to that question was...

If your answer to that question is «just as much» then you could probably look at a career in politics or become a lawyer.

If the answer to those questions where all affirmative then you've probably played Super Meat Boy, the notoriously difficult game from Team Meat, and loved every moment of it.

If the answer to either or both of these questions is yes, then it likely makes sense to take advantage of the high earn rate.

If the answer to all the above is yes, then you pass my weekend away test — which Bundara Farm Cottages does with flying colours...» - David Leser, Good Weekend Magazine 52 Weekends Away October 1999

If the answer to each question is «no», a doctor's clearance is not be required.

If the answer to even one of these questions is «yes,» the odds are that you are living with a Latchkey Dog.

If the answer to either of these questions is no, then a simple extraction would be better for the pet.

If the answer to the latter of the previously mentioned two questions that businesses may ask is about «making me feel better», «calming me», or any other benefit of having an animal, that would fall under comfort, and the ADA specifically denies emotional support as a task.

If the answer to any of those is yes, we recommend you ask them to hold onto their pet for two weeks, the period during which the dogs may be incubating the virus.»

If the answer to those two questions is «no» then you have slipped up, and you need to manage the situation before you can move on.

If the answer to any of these questions is «No,» then I would be concerned about biases in the study or its coverage.