Second, it would be a self - adjusting standard:
if classroom observation scores become inflated or if the quality of those willing to enter teaching were to decline (or rise), the threshold for tenure would adjust accordingly.
The question is whether teachers who were dismissed for low evaluation scores in the districts we studied would have received substantively different evaluation scores
if their classroom observation scores had been adjusted as we recommend.
I should add that
if classroom observations aren't useful as predictors, they also can't be used effectively for diagnostic purposes.
Not exact matches
The idea is to see
if combining information from the tests, survey, and
classroom observations could produce more stable measures of teacher contributions to learning than is possible by just using the state test.
The database includes information about each student's
classroom teacher in a given year, which allows us to estimate how much the student learned in that year and to connect that information to such professional characteristics as teacher certification, acquisition of a master's degree, teacher experience, teacher test performance, and the specific school of education the teacher had attended within Florida,
if the teacher had attended one of the eleven schools for which adequate numbers of teacher
observations were available.
If you're at all familiar with my work, you know how much I believe in the effectiveness of frequent, informal,
classroom observations with specific feedback.
What
if these recorded videos took the place of the dreaded principal drop - in — the bread and butter of today's obligatory and not - often - illuminating
classroom observation process?
When used for a teacher in a single
classroom, we frequently only have 20 or 25
observations (
if that).
Likewise,
if a teacher is performing well on the
classroom observations and student surveys but had lower - than - expected student - achievement gains, a school leader might give the teacher the benefit of the doubt for another year and hope that student achievement gains will rise.
If all the weight were placed on
classroom observations, then instructors would be tempted to go through the motions of effective practice on the day of an
observation but not on other days.
(
If some teachers are assigned particularly engaged or cohesive
classrooms year after year, the results could still be biased; this approach, however, does eliminate bias due to year - to - year differences in unmeasured
classroom traits being related to
classroom observation scores.)
We contend, however, that evaluations based on
observations of
classroom practice are valuable, even
if they do not predict student achievement gains considerably better than more subjective methods like principal ratings of teachers.
The department should specify that a probationary teacher is «ineffective» during their fourth year of teaching
if: (i) a teacher's average student achievement gain during their second through fourth year of teaching falls below that of the average first - year teacher in their district or (ii) the
classroom observations done by external observers during their second through fourth year of teaching falls below that of the average first - year teacher.
The
classroom observation process had occurred formally (
if superficially) twice a year for all teachers, irrespective of tenure status, as part of the district — union teacher contract.
The toolkit offers practical guidance that grew out of CEPR's Best Foot Forward project, which set out to discover
if it was possible to improve the
classroom observation process by letting teachers record videos of their lessons and submit their best efforts to administrators for evaluation.
If we bring these
observations to our global
classroom, we build even greater understanding among kids and their various, rich cultures.
If MET had found classroom observations to be strong predictors of other indicators of effective teaching and if the combination of measures were a significantly better predictor than any one measure alone, then Gates could have offered evidence for the merits of a particular mixing formula or range of mixing formulas for evaluating teacher
If MET had found
classroom observations to be strong predictors of other indicators of effective teaching and
if the combination of measures were a significantly better predictor than any one measure alone, then Gates could have offered evidence for the merits of a particular mixing formula or range of mixing formulas for evaluating teacher
if the combination of measures were a significantly better predictor than any one measure alone, then Gates could have offered evidence for the merits of a particular mixing formula or range of mixing formulas for evaluating teachers.
If an equal weighting of all components in the
classroom observation is best, then we don't know which particular things a teacher should do to be better.
Or, put another way,
if teachers were generating high test score gains from their students by creating a climate of abject fear in their
classrooms, their
observation scores should be low and that information is useful.
If the project had produced what Gates was hoping, it would have found that
classroom observations were strong, independent predictors of other measures of effective teaching, like student test score gains.
If we can't connect
classroom observations with effective teaching in general, we certainly can't say much about the particular aspects of teaching that were observed that most contributed to effective teaching.
If it's not on the
classroom observation checklist, you're going to be reluctant.
If there's time, the process is repeated with the second
classroom observation — but in my experience, the first discussion often lasts longer than anticipated and there isn't time for the second.
[15] Some of the RTTT winners proposed giving teachers tenure
if they are above the bar on either value - added or the
classroom observation.
If I were running a school I'd probably want to evaluate teachers using a mixture of student test score gains,
classroom observations, and feedback from parents, students, and other staff.
And
if the second stage is based solely on the
classroom observation, for example, then the final performance classification is made based on the same criteria for everyone.
Teachers who score «ineffective» on either student performance or principal
observations can still be rated «developing» overall
if they score highly on the other metric, meaning some teachers that would have previously been pushed out of the system will be allowed to stay in the
classroom at least a while longer.
We encourage families to visit the schools, and sit in on a
classroom observation if possible.
Follow - up research with the preservice teachers in this study who are now teaching, including interviews and
classroom observations, would help to determine whether and how these educators are continuing to integrate technology into their instruction and
if their K - 12 students are also using technology.
If the data does not exist, the assertion must either be deleted or administrators must work to enhance the robustness of their data collection practices by, for example, adjusting the nature of their
classroom observations or PLC meetings.
For example,
if there was little interaction observed in SIOP
classrooms, mthe Interaction component would be the focus of the next meeting and subsequent
observations.
For example,
if a teacher is rated highly effective in
classroom observations, but has an ineffective rating on the test scores, the teacher can only be rated ineffective or developing.»
If you move forward, we'll host you at one of our schools for a tour, in - person interview with a school leader,
classroom observations, and a demo lesson.
Arranging a
classroom - based
observation or internship can help you decide
if you're truly interested in teaching.
On this note, and «[i] n sum, recent research on value added tells us that, by using data from student perceptions,
classroom observations, and test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although]
if a district administrator uses data like that collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added].
In addition, «approximately half of the teachers — 48 % in ELA and 54 % in math — were rated in the top two performance quintiles
if assigned the highest performing students, while 37 % of ELA and only 18 % of math teachers assigned the lowest performing students were highly rated based on
classroom observation scores»
There was a recent study [Best Foot Forward Study] from the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University that measured hundreds of K - 12 teachers to see
if video improved
classroom observation.
However, some people would say
if this happens, multiple
classroom observations should take place in random circumstances in a sense that teachers are doing what they supposed to do rather than a well - planned «showcase» class.
You qualify for the GL - 5 grade level (starting salary $ 40,511)
if you possess one of the following: a) One year of general work experience that demonstrates the ability to take charge, make sound decisions, and maintain composure in stressful situations; learn law enforcement regulations, methods and techniques through
classroom training and / or on - the - job instruction; and gather factual information through questioning,
observation, and examination of documents and records; OR b) A bachelor's degree from an accredited or pre-accredited college or university; OR c) A combination of successfully completed post-high school education and general work experience.