If content providers have more incentive to develop better products, what's wrong with that?
Not exact matches
The order also forbids preferential treatment of traffic, which could occur
if a broadband
provider also offers
content or services that compete with services offered by smaller companies.
If the actual
content provider — say, HBO, for example — isn't happy with the number of subscribers (and revenue) it's getting from a particular television
provider, it may find it more worthwhile to go direct to consumers over the Internet through a Netflix - style streaming service.
Under block booking,
content providers (movie studios) required theatres to buy and show less - desirable B fare
if they also wanted the A-list stuff.
Third - party tech companies would have little,
if any, ability to repackage the
content of the pay - TV
providers» apps.
First, as happened in Australia and New Zealand,
if ISPs and
content providers believe they can reduce costs by peering (i.e. not have to pay transit to exchange traffic) they can use this as a competitive tool to pass on zero - rated
content to their customers, as opposed to those ISPs demanding transit payments to deliver traffic, which was particularly common when the countries could be reached only via one company, the incumbent operator.
If adopted, the new rules would ban large broadband firms like Verizon and Comcast from purposefully slowing down or discriminating against different types of data, but they would allow
content providers to pay extra to access a virtual Internet fast lane.
Action: Approach VPNs with extreme caution Who is this for: All web users — unless free Internet access is not available in your country How difficult is it: No additional effort Tell me more: While there may be times when you feel tempted to sign up and use a VPN service — say, to try to circumvent geoblocks so you can stream video
content that's not otherwise available in your country —
if you do this you should assume that the service
provider will at very least be recording everything you're doing online.
If you don't have the
content creation wherewithal, there exists a range of service
providers with whom you can work to drive your editorial strategy across Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, your website, blog, and search engines.
But
if the policy takes effect, broadband and wireless
providers could resume blocking or throttling
content, and they could establish «fast lanes» for
content providers who pay fees for special access to online consumers.
You may not do any of the following while accessing or using the Services: (i) access, tamper with, or use non-public areas of the Services, fanatix's computer systems, or the technical delivery systems of fanatix's
providers; (ii) probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of any system or network or breach or circumvent any security or authentication measures; (iii) access or search or attempt to access or search the Services by any means (automated or otherwise) other than through our currently available, published interfaces that are provided by fanatix (and only pursuant to those terms and conditions), unless you have been specifically allowed to do so in a separate agreement with Fanatix (NOTE: crawling the Services is permissible
if done in accordance with the provisions of the robots.txt file, however, scraping the Services without the prior consent of fanatix is expressly prohibited); (iv) forge any TCP / IP packet header or any part of the header information in any email or posting, or in any way use the Services to send altered, deceptive or false source - identifying information; or (v) interfere with, or disrupt, (or attempt to do so), the access of any user, host or network, including, without limitation, sending a virus, overloading, flooding, spamming, mail - bombing the Services, or by scripting the creation of
Content in such a manner as to interfere with or create an undue burden on the Services.
If you're a communications person and you can guide a
content provider to something solid, useful and just right for the audience, you'll be worth the money you're being paid.
If the FCC does not try to reestablish net neutrality rules, broadband
providers would be free to create a two - tiered market that could force
content providers to pay extra for ensuring their services get to customers in a timely fashion — whether that
content represents streaming video of movies and TV shows, a two - way telemedicine video consultation between patients and doctors or the live - streaming of a professor's lecture.
Under the rubric of «artificial artificial intelligence,» it's a venue in which a «requester» (in the Mechanical Turk terminology) with a task can break it up into fragments called human intelligence tasks (HITs), offer a price per task, and then see
if any of the cloud of «
providers» — workers looking to pick up some small quantity of micropayment labor, akin to the «
content producers» waiting for new jobs from Demand Media — will take them up.
If you have any questions about the information you receive from Learn True Health, you should ask your physician or other healthcare
provider to assist you in interpreting that
content, or in applying the information to your individual needs.
In no case shall Slickster Magazine, our directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, interns, suppliers, service
providers or licensors be liable for any injury, loss, claim, or any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special, or consequential damages of any kind, including, without limitation lost profits, lost revenue, lost savings, loss of data, replacement costs, or any similar damages, whether based in contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, arising from your use of any of the service or any products procured using the service, or for any other claim related in any way to your use of the service or any product, including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any
content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the service or any
content (or product) posted, transmitted, or otherwise made available via the service, even
if advised of their possibility.
If a school plans to use a Station - Rotation model for math with one curriculum
provider, for example, it will likely contract with one math vendor that provides supplemental math
content — like Dreambox Learning or ST Math — or use a free solution like the Khan Academy.
If it wants to work with multiple
content providers on the other hand, there is a good bet it might work with a company like Education Elements, which is emerging as a leader in helping schools move to blended - learning models and offering a single sign - on software solution for schools so they can easily work with multiple
content vendors.
Do your research and ask your
content and Learning Management System
provider if they're up to date with these eLearning standards before you invest.
Thanks to Giroux and others, the contemporary classroom - even
if it falls short of the critical pedagogues» ideal - increasingly is a block - scheduled site presided over by a teacher who, at least concerning academics, is the guide on the side, eschews grades in favor of portfolios, minimizes ability - grouping, and, rather than being a
content provider, is a manager of peer editing, team building, and other processes.
A software
provider is expected to be able to deliver
content,
if the need comes up — and an eLearning agency is expected to provide a fully - fledged Learning Management System as well.
If you are a Learning
Provider and provide Presentations you must agree to the terms and conditions of the Learning
Provider Agreement prior to publishing your Presentations on the Websites as «Learning
Content».
In other words,
if schools use textbooks as the key curriculum
content provider, then students need textbooks that they can read accurately, fluently, and with high levels of understanding.
Internet - only sites will only be considered
if they are original news
content providers.
While Gale is predominantly an academic
content provider, it will be interesting to see
if publishers and libraries are willing to adopt an unheard of model for typical library
content by basing compensation on how much is actually accessed.
Not only will there be an awareness campaign on television and an educational component, but the major internet service
providers will be notifying bill - payers
if illegal
content is being shared through their internet connection.
Again, what would the ebook marketplace look like
if, in addition to libraries,
content providers were equally committed to a sustainable ecosystem for all players?
What does an ebooks marketplace look like
if, in addition to libraries,
content providers are equally committed to a sustainable ecosystem that enables viability for all players — publishers, vendors, authors, libraries and, of course, readers?
If customers want to keep the
content they've already purchased, the need to transfer
content to other
providers.
I don't know
if its possible for any Android device to score a perfect 10 until the OS and
content providers start taking advantage of high resolution.
One Pass seems like a very excellent endeavor and it seems very detailed
if you are a publisher or
content provider.
So,
if eBook subscriptions have reached the fundamental inflection point of consumer interest and buy - in from the leading
content providers, how can they learn from and thus avoid the past tribulations of Scribd and their contemporaries?
If the crew wants to download small bits of
content they have to insure their parent company is dealing with satellite internet
providers such as VSAT and IMTECH.
With the three channels provided by Disney (free,
if you have a cable
provider subscription that includes this
content), you will see kid - friendly shows broken down into roughly sorted age groups.
If it was a trusted
provider that the publishers and the libraries trusted, we would feel comfortable that we had ownership when we bought
content.
If there is no market, developers and
content providers will go where there is one.
Users will immediately seek their favourite
content on their new devices, and
if they can not access it, they will not blame the device (or in this case Apple policy) but rather the
content providers for making the acquisition of digital
content difficult.
If you have other writing needs, please keep in mind that we are a full service
content provider, and that we will take on any project no matter how big or small.
In that sense — where the author's role is limited to that of
content provider — there is a similarity between publisher - dependent authors and independent authors, even
if there are disparities in scale.
But I would be remiss
if I did not also point out that there is still so, so much unrealized potential in terms of Kindle software and Amazon's relationships with Kindle customers and
content providers, including:
Librarians may not like the greater reliance on usage - sensitive charges on which many digital
content providers insist, but without agreeing to this approach
if need be, it would be harder to acquire
content.
If anything, I'm currently in a stage where I'd prefer to buy devices that aren't made by the
content providers.
Sorry
if this doesn't add directly to the discussion but when Liza wrote «I also hope to see an ePub style guide from Apple to help publishers and designers understand more fully what is and isn't supported in iBooks» I wasn't surprised, there doesn't seem to be any guides for
content providers at all.
If KU is going to continue to work, it's got to give good
content providers the financial incentive to stick with it, so that customers find
content they like and continue to subscribe.
If the publishers familiarize themselves with the term «change,» eBooks can be «business for the future» that they will transform themselves into «
content provider» to cater to readers» needs in order to «read» in different formats.
You need not hire a service
provider for dissertation proposal writing services or Research proposal writing services and not even for thesis writing services
if they simply copy
content from other sources.
As long as the wholesale pricing actually is wholesale pricingâ $» as in, the retailers are paying publishers a specific amount per e-book sold no matter what the retailer price isâ $» I have no problem with wholesaler pricing. I actually prefer its precedent to agency pricing, but I fear that the wholesale pricing scheme would end up modified
if forced upon retailers, with retailers only paying
content providers a percentage of whatever retail price the retailers choose.
You haven't even grappled with the question of whether Dear Author is, in fact, «another information
content provider» or
if it's the
provider of the information in question.
If a company came to court and said, «We claim the copyright in this, we asked the person to write this exact piece, we have exclusive rights in it, we approved it for publication — but we're just another information
content provider and so we aren't liable» — they are not going to win on the CDA claim.
If I wrote my own blogging software and someone wrote and posted a guest post, I as the publisher and software writer — but not the information
content provider — should still be protected.