If current understanding of the phenomena is wrong, where is the error likely to be located?
Not exact matches
They can talk about neural pathways and neurotransmitters as
if those big words definitively concluded anything, which they don't, at least with our
current understanding of such things.
But
if you're bookish (or even somewhat of a history buff), it only takes a stroll down memory lane to
understand that many of these
current issues have actually been around since the dawn of time, as have the suggested solutions to the age - old problems of greed, ignorance, inequality and suppression.
If you consider the world's
current and imagined robots, it's hard to imagine them not benefiting from Cyc - endowed abilities that grant them a more human - like
understanding of the world.
OUTLOOK:
If you can read this business's bottom - line priorities as well as the
current owner
understands her customers» yen for books, then your tenure at this retailer could be a classic.
How can we accurately measure our
current condition
if we do not appreciate and
understand the depth of our «walking pneumonia»?
If we want to
understand the debt problems facing China we have to consider not just the
current debt on the balance sheet but also what the balance sheet is likely to look like after an adverse shock.
I
understand the cap - weight asset classes are substantially correlated, but I would still be curious to see
if current trends in the S+P 500 are being supported by corresponding drops in the S+P Small Cap or DJ Wilshire5000.
To return to our example, we want to
understand what will happen
if China runs a $ 22 billion trade surplus and exports the full amount to the United States, which causes the U.S. capital account surplus and the US
current account deficit both to rise by $ 19 billion.
If China reduces its
current account surplus / capital account deficit with the United States, my
understanding is the dollar will fall.
If you enter the real estate market with an
understanding of
current trends, you'll be more likely to succeed.
Similarly,
if you
understand what major forces move the market for your chosen asset, you can take advantage of
current events as they happen to make a quick decision and invest in the appropriate options contract.
In some cases, it may be the «best deal around», but
understand the risks here:
if you take out a HELOC to do a debt consolidation, just make sure you stay
current with your payments or you could be risking your home.
It is as though those shaping the domestic agenda of the government do not see the explicitly racial character of this problem, as
if they do not
understand the historical experiences that link, symbolically and sociologically, the
current urban underclass to our long, painful legacy of racial trauma.
You've had a personal experience leading you to your
current god concept,
if I
understand you correctly.
If you want to
understand some of the nuances to the
current debate on justification, I recommend this book.
There are several arguments that can be advanced against this position: first, that there is no need to adapt or interpret the Bible this way because this «modern common sense» is quite uncommon; second, that the
current popularity of a belief or point of view is no guarantee of its truth, so the Bible ought not to be adapted to suit the
understanding of a particular time; third, that the Bible can not be adapted to this common sense, because this common sense excludes God; and fourth, that
if our common sense disagrees with the Bible, then we must change our common sense after all, because the Bible is true.
If the Easter faith is
understood primarily as the conviction of the exaltation of the crucified Jesus to be Lord and Savior, it is possible to
understand how it could have arisen among the dispirited disciples as their response to the «offence» of the crucifixion of their Master, while they wrestled with that problem in the light of the impact made on them by the life and teaching of Jesus, and in the light of their study of the scriptures, of their
current convictions about similar figures and of their belief about God.
There is another important theological
current that at first seems strangely missing from The Secular City but whose absence, in retrospect, one can
understand if not forgive.
If you want to learn more about this and how these insights help us
understand God, Scripture, theology,
current events, politics, and even your very own life, I recommend you get started with my book The Atonement of God.
Yet,
if I
understand your views regarding the modern state of Israel and its
current conflict with its neighbors correctly, I do have some real concerns — particularly in light of the
current political climate (the U.N. vote on Palestinian statehood) as well as a growing trend among certain Christian polemicists against Israel (see Gary Burge and Stephen Sizer).
Even
if it is true, finally, that the text accomplishes its meaning only in personal appropriation, in the «historical» decision (and this I believe strongly with Bultmann against all the
current philosophies of a discourse without the subject), this appropriation is only the final stage, the last threshold of an
understanding which has first been uprooted and moved into another meaning.
I also find it unacceptable scientifically because
if one is approaching it from our
current understanding of Relativity, the thing that corresponds to our awareness of the universe over an interval of time is not a simultaneity slab, because in General Relativity there is no such thing.
These forms of consciousness will of course be different for every person, based on personal experience... so that is where a personal God comes in... one that fits each person's
current level of
understanding... a living, hopefully growing perception as knowledge increases, instead of a fixed idol or icon... but
if it provides a person a non-harmful useful comfort and positive function, then what genius has the right to deprive them of that, with ridicule that their
understanding is different and better, when the person being ridiculed at the time, does not possess the knowledge required to have the same
understanding of the person ridiculing.
The hope underlying the conference was that,
if aspects of Whitehead's form of process philosophy were effectively communicated to scientists who in turn could help philosophers
understand the nature of their
current problems, both philosophers and scientists would benefit.
Clearly, anyone who has study history and
understands current societies around the world (right here in USA, also);
if you do not
understand — you must be living in a small hole in the ground.
@Moby «Since we don't know
if the universe might have some mechanism of self - starting that is beyond our
current understanding of the universe's function» @Chad «that is a self refuting statement..
Since we don't know
if the universe might have some mechanism of self - starting that is beyond our
current understanding of the universe's function, it's stupid to classify it, as you do, as «thoughtful» and «supernatural.»
Your argument holds true
if, and only
if, the
current understanding of the universe holds true, and only
if ours is the only possible universe.
Real president Fiorentino Perez is not shy of opening up his chequebook for the right player, and CaughtOffside
understands there could be as many as five main targets ready to come into the Bernabeu midway through the season, particularly
if current results do not improve.
If you did not see Pep's former club Barcelona beat his
current club Bayern Munich this week then you might not
understand why, but the game highlighted the Spaniard's stubborn refusal to alter his possession based style of play and they paid a big price.
I accept you should probably have an
understanding of the philosophy of the club
if you're old enough to fully comprehend exactly what it is your club strives for, but you don't necessarily have to believe in the
CURRENT philosophy to be a fan because clubs go through transitions.
The
current leadership seems to be taking the position that the people who know the facts and
understand the situations are in a place to make judgments and everybody else has an opinion that doesn't matter (even
if it's loud and popular).
Same thing for Higuain, our forwards have a good
if not great
understanding and will be even better next season (Welbeck, Sanchez); the only way I see him coming in is
if we sell one of the
current forwards we have.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate
understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this
current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization...
if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the
current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
If you want to talk mediocrity look at other teams other then Man U even Chelsea and you will
understand what mediocrity is Morons like you will never appreciate what Wenger has done for Arsenal football club Certainly more then the
current plastic moronic fanbase at Arsenal I've been a season ticket holder since 1976 and this is the worst fanbase I have seen in that time BeforfNs start saying we pay top money my answer is don't come t the ground we don't need stupid fans better to have half empty stadium full of real fans then morons taking out their real frustrations of failure on the team Just ask spuds fans who seem to back their team even though they have only won 2 trophies in 30 years and only been in the cl 4 times as opposed to the cabinet Full of trophies that Wenger has delivered plus a new stadium and works class stars that have played for us in his tenure.
I know, not all the kids will make it at arsenal's level, but the plan has always been for them to play together since the beginning and develop an
understanding and relationship between them, so possibly most
if not all of the
current reserves team go on to first - team level.
If Romney becomes the candidate, a closer look at his
current campaign can help us
understand how he will fight the general election.
«Opaque systems that nobody could
understand played a key part in the
current financial crisis - so
if anything greater transparency is needed.»
And I encourage people
if you can't go in your neighborhood, go to a meeting in another neighborhood, and go to more than one
if necessary, so that you can get and
understanding of what the
current discussion is around solid waste management in the city of Albany.»
If we
understand this, it won't just change the way we view the lives of the poorest in society, it will also show how misguided many
current efforts to tackle society's problems are — and it will suggest better solutions.
«
If we can get a better
understanding of the climate in the past, of the consequences of climate change and of how it shaped communities, then we might be able to interpret the future of biodiversity under the
current climate change scenario,» says Guénard.
To that end, the United Kingdom in December signed a memorandum of
understanding with nine other northern European states — Germany, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Ireland, Luxembourg and Norway — to study the possibility of building a $ 30 billion ($ 41.4 billion) grid in the North Sea that could be producing 100 GW of electricity within 20 years
if all
current plans come to fruition.
If replicated and extended, the
current findings may further our
understanding of how cognitive - affective response plays a role in stress and depression and also aid clinicians in identifying those most at risk following a natural disaster, wrote the researchers.
If this «wobbling» is not an unknown astrophysical phenomenon and in fact the result of the behaviour of dark matter, then it is inconsistent with the standard model of dark matter and can only be explained if dark matter particles can interact with each other — a strong contradiction to the current understanding of dark matte
If this «wobbling» is not an unknown astrophysical phenomenon and in fact the result of the behaviour of dark matter, then it is inconsistent with the standard model of dark matter and can only be explained
if dark matter particles can interact with each other — a strong contradiction to the current understanding of dark matte
if dark matter particles can interact with each other — a strong contradiction to the
current understanding of dark matter.
«
If you want to see if a galaxy makes sense in our current understanding of cosmology, you want to look at the dark matter halo — the collapsed dark matter structure — in which it resides,» said Chris Hayward, an associate research scientist at the Center for Computational Astrophysics at the Flatiron Institute in New York City who provides theoretical support for the ALMA follow - up of SPT - discovered galaxie
If you want to see
if a galaxy makes sense in our current understanding of cosmology, you want to look at the dark matter halo — the collapsed dark matter structure — in which it resides,» said Chris Hayward, an associate research scientist at the Center for Computational Astrophysics at the Flatiron Institute in New York City who provides theoretical support for the ALMA follow - up of SPT - discovered galaxie
if a galaxy makes sense in our
current understanding of cosmology, you want to look at the dark matter halo — the collapsed dark matter structure — in which it resides,» said Chris Hayward, an associate research scientist at the Center for Computational Astrophysics at the Flatiron Institute in New York City who provides theoretical support for the ALMA follow - up of SPT - discovered galaxies.
Lead author Anna Pintor said
if we want to
understand impacts of climate change in the future, we need to know how species»
current distributions come about it the first place.
@Charlie,
if I
understand your question correctly, our
current instruments would not be capable of finding an Earth - sized planet in the habitable zones of A or B.
«
If current nanobes can be shown to be living entities, then Earth harbors life forms whose chemistry we do not
understand,» says Knoll.
I
understand it's not an overtly direct extrapolation, but fundamentally it more or less still is
if the underlying assumptions about the feedbacks are presumed to not only be correct but also operate proportionally the same to the forcing from the LGM as they do in reponse to future forcings in the
current climate.