If your emissions report has NOx readings this may help to confirm / rule out this possibility.
Not exact matches
Canadian liquefied natural gas can lower global greenhouse gas
emissions if it displaces dirtier sources of power abroad, according to a new C.D. Howe Institute
report.
The UK could cut the carbon
emissions from passenger cars in half
if the population went meat - free or vegan, according to a new
report from Lancaster University.
Widespread adoption of a meat free diet could see
emissions drop by 63 per cent, the
report says, or 70 per cent
if veganism were taken up.
The San Francisco Chronicle
reports that
if compost were applied over 5 % of the state's grazing lands, the soil could capture a year's worth of greenhouse gas
emissions from California's farm and forestry industries, or the equivalent of removing 6 million cars from the road.
The government could come under pressure to give out extra credits
if people found it too hard to reduce their
emissions, the
report said, and it would also be an expensive option compared to other ways of cutting
emissions, like carbon taxation.
Last week New Scientist
reported that US
emissions could be cut by more than 7 per cent
if people changed their ways at home.
«Significant» reductions needed The U.N. Environment Programme's «
Emissions Gap 2012»
report cautions that even
if nations meet their strictest pledges, the world will not be able to cut its output of greenhouse gases in time to prevent runaway global warming (ClimateWire, Nov. 21).
If diesel vehicles account for 30 per cent of the PM10
emissions from all sources (as suggested by a recent
report for the Department of the Environment), then the adviser's estimate makes some sense.
But this latest
report suggests that
if the U.S. reduces its
emissions, we're in a better position to influence others, such as China, to do the same.
In a
report last year, the Global CCS Institute found that technologies reusing captured CO2 could play a role in controlling
emissions in some markets, even
if their global potential for controlling the greenhouse gas is small.
According to a
report from Imperial College London, we are going to have to halve our carbon dioxide
emissions by 2050
if we want avoid dangerous levels of climate change.
At least two studies published since 2010 — one
report from the United Nations Environment Programme in 2011 and a follow - up published in Science last year — suggested that significantly reducing the
emissions of soot and methane could trim human - caused warming by at least 0.5 °C (0.9 ° F) by 2050, compared with an increase of about 1 °C
if those
emissions continued unabated.
The numerous rules will address issues such as how countries will track and
report their
emissions and have them verified, all in a transparent way; how countries will be required to communicate their future
emissions - reduction plans as well as their pledges for funding adaptation efforts; and
if and how market mechanisms, such as
emissions trading between countries, will be applied to national targets.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its first
report in 1990 predicted that temperatures would warm by 0.5 degree Fahrenheit (0.3 degree Celsius) per decade
if no efforts were made to restrain greenhouse gas
emissions.
A new
report published today by researchers from Imperial College London and the University of Sheffield shows that global carbon
emissions could be cut by one gigatonne per year (3 % of global
emissions) in less than five years
if other countries followed the same strategy.
«
If, as in the past, the ambition of these sectors continues to fall behind efforts in other sectors and if action to combat climate change is further postponed, their emission shares in global CO2 emissions may rise substantially to 22 percent for international aviation and 17 percent for maritime transport by 2050,» the report sai
If, as in the past, the ambition of these sectors continues to fall behind efforts in other sectors and
if action to combat climate change is further postponed, their emission shares in global CO2 emissions may rise substantially to 22 percent for international aviation and 17 percent for maritime transport by 2050,» the report sai
if action to combat climate change is further postponed, their
emission shares in global CO2
emissions may rise substantially to 22 percent for international aviation and 17 percent for maritime transport by 2050,» the
report said.
It could happen as soon as 2050
if emissions aren't curtailed, the
report found.
That temperature rise could nearly double by the end of this century
if greenhouse gas
emissions aren't curbed, according to the most recent
report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
According to the recent Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic
report,
if we reduce
emissions roughly in line with the Paris Agreement, we would see an additional 54 centimeters of global sea level rise by 2100.
The media speak of Algae oil, several recent articles in the media, or grasses that increase existing ethanol yields by up to 250 % (recently
reported again in the UK media), of CCS trials in Australia, of CCS ready power stations (hillarious to be fair) and of wind and solar farms portrayed as
if they will solve our carbon
emissions issues.
And
if we continue to track the highest
emissions scenarios — taking us to 4C or 5C by the end of the century — the risk of potentially catastrophic impacts rises even higher, the
report adds.
There's a fantastic paper by the authors of the Beyond Zero
Emissions Land Use Report explaining how there's an opportunity to reduce land sector emissions (especially methane) to temporarily halt global warming buying us time to get off fossils fuels if we reduced livestock production by say 5
Emissions Land Use
Report explaining how there's an opportunity to reduce land sector
emissions (especially methane) to temporarily halt global warming buying us time to get off fossils fuels if we reduced livestock production by say 5
emissions (especially methane) to temporarily halt global warming buying us time to get off fossils fuels
if we reduced livestock production by say 50 % even.
The U.N. released a
report that says the worst effects of climate change can still be avoided
if we act quickly to reduce the effects of greenhouse - gas
emissions.
And
if you're wondering
if a vending machine book costs less than the real deal (OK, OK, I should put my snark in check; the machines are really nifty - looking, supposedly they cut down on CO2
emissions, plus it would be great to gain access to out - of - print books)... The Associated Press
reported recently that EBM books will have a «recommended sales price of $ 8 per copy, although the final decision will be left to each retailer.»
According to the recent McKinsey
report regarding the reduction of carbon dioxide
emissions,
if I remember it correctly, although these cars are initially more expensive (in terms of purchase price), their greater fuel efficiency results in the fact that owners will actually SAVE money over a time period that makes the whole thing a very GOOD investment.
Reports of falling
emissions are great, but even
if they are accurate, the reductions are not on the scale needed to address the problem.
If you look at my original comments regarding stopping the increase in GHG
emissions within five years, to be followed by steep reductions to near zero
emissions within ten years, you will see that I have in fact cited, and quoted, sources — beginning with the IEA's recent
report.
The International Energy Agency today released a helpful
report that charts four climate-wise (
if fairly familiar) actions countries can pursue to make a difference in greenhouse - gas
emissions by 2020.
Gates hammered on points
reported here for many years: that without a big, and sustained, boost in spending on basic research and development on energy frontiers, the chances of triggering an energy revolution are nil; that while the private sector and venture capital investors are vital for transforming breakthroughs into marketable products or services, they will not invest in the long - haul inquiry that's required to generate game - changing breakthroughs; that a 1 or 2 percent tax on carbon - emitting fuels could generate a large, steady stream of money for invigorating the innovation pipeline; that a declining
emissions cap and credit trading system ---
if it could survive America's polarized politics --- would have to raise energy costs far beyond what would be politically tenable to generate a similar scale of transformational activity.
And
if you buy the IPCC's
reports (figuratively speaking) the world is only about eight years away from the «deadline» the IPCC has identified for allowing
emissions to peak and begin their descent
if the world is to stand a 50 - 50 chance of holding global warming to about 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit by century's end.
[ANDY REVKIN notes: I also encourage you,
if you haven't seen it already, to read today's
report by James Kanter and Jad Mouawad showing deep flaws in Europe's system for capping (and trading)
emissions of greenhouse gases.
In the
report released today by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world's top scientists warned that global warming is unequivocally man - made and will become irreversible
if we do not act now to reduce the amount of carbon
emissions released into the atmosphere.
And, with the latest McKinsey
report, it becomes even more clear that,
if we want to substantially reduce
emissions, we will either need a carbon tax, a cap - and - trade approach, or a whole bunch of specific individual regulations aimed at encouraging and prompting the many individual
emission reduction opportunities.
Paul Williams, a meteorologist at the University of Reading in the UK,
reports in the Advances in Atmospheric Sciences journal that he used supercomputer simulations to test the rise in rough rides and scary moments at altitudes of 9,000 metres across the Atlantic
if carbon dioxide ratios in the atmosphere double − as they could this century, unless drastic action is taken to reduce
emissions.
If the ROW recommendations are acted upon, then the Chiapas program will have to have a robust reference level and monitoring,
reporting and verification (MRV) guidelines in addition to a strategy to reduce
emissions, Janson - Smith says.
According to the
report,
if Canada had adopted some key provincial policies in 2008,
emissions would be 77 - million tonnes lower by 2020, bringing us close (within 5.6 per cent) to the international
emissions target.
Canada can be a world leader in
emissions reductions and renewable energy use, but only
if its federal government decides to take climate change seriously, according to a new
report.
Every
report I'd seen is that the major western countries»
emissions have all gone up, except for the US in 2006 (
if the data is to be believed).
Indeed, the IPCC
report went on to say that climate change will continue for many centuries even
if carbon dioxide
emissions are stopped.
Your
report acknowledges that «our energy must come from lower
emission sources»
if we are to meet the ambitious and essential targets that lie before us.
And, according to the
report, California is already on the way to the massive
emissions reductions: «California can achieve
emissions roughly 60 percent below 1990 levels with technology we largely know about today
if such technology is rapidly deployed at rates that are aggressive but feasible.»
LONDON, NEW YORK March 8 — Fossil fuel companies risk wasting $ 1.6 trillion of expenditure by 2025
if they base their business on
emissions policies already announced by governments instead of international climate goals, Carbon Tracker warns in a
report released today, that models the IEA's 1.75 C scenario for the first time.
It is more likely that most,
if not all, of the main elements of the Kyoto architecture and its institutional infrastructure (the
reporting,
emission monitoring and verification system) will remain in place in any new regime, or at least serve as the basis for developing new proposals.
The
report, The Critical Decade: Extreme Weather, suggests worsening weather exacerbated by global warming is inevitable in coming decades, even
if action is taken immediately to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
If its $ 37 - billion annual subsidy were phased out, the World Bank
reports that Iran's carbon
emissions would drop by a staggering 49 percent.
That threshold is likely to be reached even
if we begin to cut global greenhouse gas
emissions, which so far has not happened, according to the
report.
«
If CO2
emissions were declining rapidly, I don't think there would be that much impetus behind dong a
report like this.
LONDON, April 26 — EU carbon prices are set to double by 2021 and could quadruple to $ 55 a tonne by 2030
if the European Commission ultimately legislates to align the bloc's current
emissions targets with the Paris climate agreement, finds a new
report by Carbon Tracker released today.
Until now, it's been difficult for many cities to measure and
report their
emissions, said Andrew Steer, president and CEO of the environmental group World Resources Institute: «
If we want to turn the tide against climate change, cities will need to lead the way.»