Sentences with phrase «if expressing your thoughts»

If expressing your thoughts on paper isn't your strong suit, you may wonder how to write a college essay.

Not exact matches

Simply looking for the traits you think a leader should have isn't enough, according to Furnham, you also need to worry if a candidate has a trait in excess and provide structures that make sure would - be leaders learn how to express those traits for good rather than ill.

Globally dominant American tech companies have expressed concern that customers will go elsewhere if they think the U.S. government's reach extends to data centers all around the world without changes being made to the law.

If you're angry about your workplace...... express your thoughts in a constructive manner.

«If Apple thinks the lawsuit is a waste of resources it could simply end the matter by complying with existing law and filing a new proxy that unbundles the proposed changes to the charter so that shareholders can express their views on each matter separately,» a Greenlight spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday.

If and when Moon Express does succeed, he thinks it will knock down barriers for future entrepreneurs.

Because he thinks «human nature is basically positive,» if more people express their ideas or vote or volunteer, the results will ipso facto be basically positive.

(For instance I'm fairly confident that promiscuity is sinful, especially when it comes from a place of lust, but I'm less convinced that my committed same - sex friends are sinning by expressing their love physically any more than I am sinning when my wife and I express our love physically — even though I think we can be if we are acting out of lust or as a means of asserting power over one another, but that is another story).

If we think of the occasion as a whole, we may distinguish between the totality of causal influences inherited from the past actual world and its causa sui which is finally expressed in the way it has completely integrated these causal influences (by inclusion and / or exclusion) in the satisfaction.

If we think this way about symmetry, careful analysis shows that, when marbles arrange themselves into the hexagonal pattern, just six of the infinite number of symmetries in the shape of the marbles are expressed or manifested in their final arrangement.

If your god is «inserting info» (whatever form that takes) for the express purpose of fulfilling someone's request to guide someone's thoughts, that is very different than someone listening to someone else's ideas (and teachers are not different than anyone else, except maybe since they are considered experts in their field they are taken more seriously in their particular area of expertise) and considering their ideas when forming your own.

It would be entirely different if you were to verbally express those thoughts that were internal, and not recognize them as evil, nor cry to Him for forgiveness.

He should atleast be free to express his views openly in that forum, even if you don't like what he says and don't think he should be saying it as part of the political process.

If anything, I think that this controversy has opened up a dialog with Islamic Americans and has given followers of Islam a stage to express views that (in a normal news cycle) would not get any press.

I still can't really tell if the way you express ideas here is actually the way you would think about and express them, or if finding an extra-controversial way to express something that isn't too controversial is part of the art of blogging, catching people's attention and sparking discussion.

My constant purpose was and is to adumbrate on every subject I handle a genuinely canonical interpretation of Scripture - a view that in its coherence embraces and expresses the thrust of all the biblical passages and units of thought that bear on my theme - a total, integrated view built out of biblical material in such a way that, if the writers of the various books knew what I had made of what they taught, they would nod their heads and say that I had got them right.

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

It runs something like this: «What must the truth be for us, if men and women who thought and spoke and wrote like that in their own day expressed its truth in the fashion in which they did in fact do this?»

Look I don't know if its going to be through a burning bush that talks or some random dude stopping you on the street and is able to express all your innermost thoughts, but I do know that he will reveal himself to you in a way that you won't be able to deny him anymore.

Thank you for having helped me to correct my ways of commenting and sorry if I ever reacted strongly at the time but now I understand how that was too strong to express thoughts.

Jolsteen, Graham and persons like these, are the worst example of the freedom to express yourself, but they can be bought, why would they talk to a Cult if they think it is a Cult.

We speak of a Whither of the experience of transcendence not in order to express it in as complicated and involved a manner as possible, but for a twofold reason: If we were simply to say «God», we might mistakenly be thought to be speaking of God as an objectified notion, while

I thought that President Obama would remain personally popular even if the public started expressing greater disapproval of....

«If he expressed no view I don't think anybody is of right to interpret and read the mind of the person... we do not have a window into people's soul.

I think if you notice someone isolating, if you notice someone's behavior changing, it's ok to express concern.

The responder may begin with a phrase such as «Let's see if I understand how it looks to you...» and then he paraphrases what he thinks the other is expressing, (d) Switch roles and try to state each other's position and feelings on one issue on which you have obvious differences of viewpoint, (e) Practice nonverbal communication by attempting to get messages through to each other with the use of touch, facial expressions, body movements, gestures, eye communication.

Our extended family represents a mixture of faiths, so for us the simple motzi of my faith (Praised are you, Adonai our G - d, who brings forth bread from the earth, Amen) is recited, with additional thoughts expressed by others around the table if so desired.

Tom expressed his desire for her to be happy and fulfilled as a person but showed continuing distress at the thought of things changing as they would if she acquired a career.

If the Political Responsibility statement is in fact merely a recapitulation of Catholic social thought, then where is the emphasis on subsidiarity, that «fundamental principle of social philosophy» (Quadraesimo Anno), which expresses the Church's (not the Republicans») own sense of the inadequacy of state interventions?

What he meant by this was as a whole an accomplishment of varied activity that expresses the potentialities of individuals interacting with their actual environments as much as possible, if, as Whitehead thought, each individual is the embodiment of the adventure of life, of existence itself, the art of life is the guiding of this advance.

In the same way, as I argued in the introduction to Stepping Stones to a Global Ethic, the contemporary concern for human rights, even if expressed in the thought forms of the Enlightenment, is grounded in faith traditions.28

I think I might win some agreement from my students if I expressed a tentative understanding of the matter as follows.

This thought pattern, which has been dominant in the Church for centuries, was clearly expressed by the Council of Trent when it declared «If anyone says that baptism is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation, anathema sit.»

If you think there is no freedom to express oneself in the U.S., because of that incident, I think you are not seeing the big picture.

And, if a church member thinks that an expressed vision is not being directed by God, what should that member do with that suspicion?

Now it is obvious you as well have used words to treaten me personally I would stop using verses... it is because my English is not strong to debate and make my self clear and that is why been quoting verses that speaks of the same subject... So as seems if all hate my quoting and that I can not express my self as should, the only choice I have is to stop completely participating in your blogs and rather go to look after my business and family, I think I have left words and links enough for any one who wants to find out what they want to know... so long...

I would much prefer if he would just clearly express his views and why he thinks the opposing views are wrong and dangerous.

... if we are to be attentive to God's work in the world, we must listen attentively to the language of the people of our time... It is not only a matter of expressing the Gospel message in contemporary language; it is also necessary to have the courage to think more deeply - as happened in other epochs - about the relationship between faith, the life of the Church and the changes human beings are experiencing.

For if the ethical (i.e. the moral) is the highest thing, and if nothing incommensurable remains in man in any other way but as the evil (i.e. the particular which has to be expressed in the universal), then one needs no other categories besides those which the Greeks possessed or which by consistent thinking can be derived from them.

If one will look a little more closely, I have not much doubt that in the whole world one will not find a single analogy (except a later instance which proves nothing), if it stands fast that Abraham is the representative of faith, and that faith is normally expressed in him whose life is not merely the most paradoxical that can be thought but so paradoxical that it can not be thought at alIf one will look a little more closely, I have not much doubt that in the whole world one will not find a single analogy (except a later instance which proves nothing), if it stands fast that Abraham is the representative of faith, and that faith is normally expressed in him whose life is not merely the most paradoxical that can be thought but so paradoxical that it can not be thought at alif it stands fast that Abraham is the representative of faith, and that faith is normally expressed in him whose life is not merely the most paradoxical that can be thought but so paradoxical that it can not be thought at all.

Keep in mind that what's in your heart is most important - even if your brain and body get in the way of expressing it - and - having an extremely logical thought process does NOT make you less of a Christian.

Now if a Jew was to think on these lines at all, and with all his heritage he could not avoid doing so, he was bound to think in terms of sacrifice, for it was through penitence expressed in terms of sacrifice that sin could be forgiven.

I could not go on day to day if I felt the level of despair she expresses, and I don't think God meant for us to live this way.

If you think this is awkward party talk, what is even MORE AWKWARD is feeling others watch what you eat so that they can learn what foods express their genes best!

If you want to show someone how amazing you think they are, say for the up coming Father's Day or a birthday then these are a great way to express your love and appreciation for that special someone =).

now to the topic: yeah i get what you mean a fan shouldnt think of the club as a brand but if fans think about the manager or player of a club they should and have to consider them as humans / workers of a brand just because we love the club its not right to bash blame and insult them because of failure, what we can do is demand change, expressing our disliking and / or criticising them constructively but insulting and offending them is a no - go.

If he wishes to join Arsenal, he will have to take a wage cut, something I think which is quite likely to happen because the player himself has expressed his unhappiness at being no2 at PSG, being benched and played out of position.

But if the Daily Express report is right and Shaw is likely to be sidelined with a groin problem, then maybe Wenger can afford to think again and bring Chambers in to strengthen the spine of the Gunners.

«If you think the Generals are paying all of Walker's salary, or the Express is covering the whole package for Young, you're mistaken,» he says.

Similar fears had been expressed by reporters, prompting Arias to say, «I think it would be nice if the press would stop putting so much pressure on us by saying how bad we are.