If improving the human condition is the reason for affirming growth, would it not be better to let that be our aim?
Not exact matches
Imagine what the world would be like today
if human history had been one of cooperation to
improve the
human condition instead of one of advancing self - interest.
If someone believes in the creation story to the extent that they reject scientific inquiry, they're not well - equipped to conduct the research and do the work needed in the future to benefit and
improve the
condition of and ensure the survival of the earth and its
human and animal populations.
In an
improving state of the
human mind, the influences are constantly on the increase which tend to generate in each individual a feeling of unity with all the rest; which,
if perfect, would make him never think of, or desire, any beneficial
condition for himself in the benefits of which they are not included.
If the therapy can be
improved and shown to work well in
humans, it could be an entirely new way to help battle obesity, diabetes and related
conditions.
It is becoming apparent that other key members of the microbiome like fungi and viruses may play a key role in
human health and disease [31] and understanding these dynamics will be imperative
if we are to
improve these
conditions.
At the opening panel of the Breakthrough Dialogue, two leading environmental thinkers — Clive Hamilton and Mark Lynas — debated
if humans can
improve, or merely mitigate, environmental
conditions in the Anthropocene.
Let's throw out CO2 from the equation for the moment as a by - product of the real problem and reframe the debate around what
if anything can be implemented to save the taxpayer some money and
improve the
human condition.