If international climate policies succeed, against all odds, in sealing an ambitious deal on the confinement of global warming to < 2 °C, then the focus of TE research should actually shift to the social transformations arena: a massive acceleration of innovation processes for the decarbonization of our contemporary industrial metabolism will be the only way to deliver.
Not exact matches
«This is important, as it shows that Mexico is serious about addressing
climate change even
if there is a change in leadership,» agreed Jake Schmidt,
international climate change
policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Duncan Marsh, director of
international climate policy at the Nature Conservancy, praised Indonesia's
climate efforts and noted that the government said it can achieve the deeper end of its 29 - to -41-percent emissions curb by 2030
if it receives
international finance.
«Global efforts to stay well below 2 degrees [Celsius of warming], and especially 1.5 degrees, will be severely compromised
if international aviation and shipping emissions continue to increase,» Mark Lutes, senior global
climate policy adviser at the World Wide Fund for Nature's global
climate and energy initiative, said by email.
This is how Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain described the
climate policy challenge in 2005 and,
if anything, his statement is more germane now given prospects for prolonged
international financial ills: «The blunt truth about the politics of
climate change is that no country will want to sacrifice its economy in order to meet this challenge.»
If you have a dark sense of humor and need a chuckle to deal with such news, particularly in light of the ongoing stasis over
international and United States
policy on
climate and energy, have a look at Marc Roberts's latest cartoon posting, which is from his archives but all too relevant.
If you want to learn more about the Paris Agreement and the
international legal and
policy framework to address
climate change, check out Module 2 of the Introductory e-course on Climate
climate change, check out Module 2 of the Introductory e-course on
Climate Climate Change.
Kelly Sims Gallagher, Director of Tufts University's Center for
International Environment and Resource
Policy, told Science that
if emissions aren't being measured, countries will not know who is keeping their promises according to the Paris
climate accords.
This can only happen
if there have been «significant developments in scientific knowledge about
climate change, or European or
international law or
policy».
LONDON, NEW YORK March 8 — Fossil fuel companies risk wasting $ 1.6 trillion of expenditure by 2025
if they base their business on emissions
policies already announced by governments instead of
international climate goals, Carbon Tracker warns in a report released today, that models the IEA's 1.75 C scenario for the first time.
Ulriikka Aarnio, CAN Europe
International Climate Policy Coordinator said: «The EU played a crucial role in ensuring the Paris Agreement came into place, but domestically the EU keeps acting as
if Paris never happened.
This pamphlet, circulated to both U.S. and
international policy - makers questions whether
climate change is man - made and
if so, the extent of contribution of fossil fuels to the problem.
If records were available on national compliance with ethical obligations for
climate change, they could be used both by the
international community to pressure nations to improve performance on their
climate change ethical obligations and also create a factual basis that could be used by citizens within the nation to ensure that the national
climate change
policies consider ethical obligations in setting their emissions targets.
On the occasion of the Friends of the Earth
International days of action for
climate justice, activists from Center for the Environment / Friends of the Earth Bosnia & Herzegovina gathered in front of the Republika Srpska government building to show clearly what the country can expect over the next 30 years
if the government continues to pursue a
policy of investing in fossil fuels.
48 - 52)
If there is any doubt that economic self - interest is not compatible with the idea of «equity» it also is an unacceptable basis for establishing national
climate change
policies because economic self - interest is also inconsistent with well established
international legal principles including:
The paper argues that
international criticism of Japanese Mamizu
climate policy proposals as being too weak was unfounded, and
if anything, the proposals may have been too ambitious.
If the United States «stays the course» with President Bush's non-interventionist
climate policies over the next decade, then by the third decade of this century all of American life — politics,
international relations, our homes, our jobs, our industries, the kind of cars we drive — will be forever transformed.
«But as long as the scientists continue to spread the message that we will be ok
if we all make a few small changes, then
climate change will never be on top of the
policy agenda and we will fail to meet our
international commitments to avoid a 2 °C rise.»
And,
if so, should this more ambitious number become part of
international climate policy?
«Given the partisan make - up of Congress, $ 3 billion is a reasonable figure,» said Karen Orenstein, Senior
international policy analyst with Friends of the Earth U.S. «But
if we step outside of Washington's warped politics, then $ 3 billion falls magnitudes below what is actually needed by developing countries to confront a
climate crisis that is not of their making.»
Most importantly
if the United States enacts a
climate policy it could begin to act like a real leader in
international negotiations and push other countries to do the same.
«It's not going to happen
if we boast about how we're going to scrap
international treaties, or have elected officials who are alone in the world in denying
climate change, or put our energy and environmental
policies in the hands of big polluters,» Mr. Obama said.»
We can avoid
climate change, and boost the world's economy —
if we act now Reversing the damage is within our grasp, but it will hinge on a strong
international climate agreement and
policies that make polluters pay
A strong ethical case can be made that
if nations have duties to limit their ghg emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions, a conclusion that follows both as a matter of ethics and justice and several
international legal principles including, among others, the «no harm principle,» and promises nations made in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt
policies and measures required to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the
climate system in accordance with equity and common but differentiated responsibilities, nations have a duty to clearly explain how their national ghg emissions reductions commitments arguably satisfy their ethical obligations to limit their ghg emissions to the nation's fair share of safe global emissions.
If NDCs are to become the long - term instrument for
international cooperation, negotiation, and ratcheting up of ambitions to address
climate change, then they need to become more transparent and comparable, both with respect to mitigation goals, and to issues such as adaptation, finance, and the way in which NDCs are aligned with national
policies.
It's not as
if the British or American public were ever really asked about their views before
international climate negotiations began, and thus there's no evidence that public opinion ever led to the failure of
climate policies.