If liberal principles are to mean anything, a liberal's duty is to challenge excesses and concentrations of power, particularly concerning the State.
Not exact matches
Even
if all parties were to agree that American republicanism is not classically
liberal, or that classical liberalism really is ontologically indifferent, or that the laws of nature and of nature's God are the foundation of constitutional order and that these are the same thing as natural law — even
if, in other words, all parties were to agree to some version of a pristine American founding harmonious in
principle with the truth of God and the human being — returning to the first
principles of the eighteenth century isn't much more realistic than a return to the first
principles of the thirteenth.
If liberalism was «the anti-dogmatic
principle,» then
liberals must take a low view of the foundation of dogma, the visible Church.
And
if the Indian Constitution begins with affirming the humanist
principles of liberty, equality, fraternity and justice it has behind it the impact of
liberal and socialist secular ideologies as well as Renascent Hinduism from Raja Rammohan Roy to Gandhi who absorbed these values and made them part of the Renascent Hinduism itself.
But
if endowments are conceived solely as instruments, rather than equal partners with the state in pursuit of the public good, then the classic
principle of private association in
liberal democracies has been lost, for instrumentality implies that government alone is the public good's ultimate arbiter.
«
If it becomes clear that the national interest which is stable and
principled government can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour party and the
Liberal democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty to form that government which would in my view command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's Speech and any other confidence votes.
If activists persist in supporting policies on the basis that they are infused with social
liberal values and
principles, rather than their popularity with the swing voter in the centre ground, then that is oh so endearingly and impractically childlike.
If this Bill is passed it will directly go against the founding
principles of the Social
Liberal Forum; by doing great damage to social justice.
The key
principle, which the
Liberal Democrat leader has set out for at least a year now, was repeated in an interview in The Independent 10 days ago: «
If a party with no majority has the strongest mandate, we accept the
principle that that party has the right to govern either on its own or to reach out to others.»
«In his report on the financing of Higher Education (HE), Lord Browne has made several recommendations that,
if implemented by the government, would put at risk the key
principles in Higher Education — widening participation, fair access and financial equity — that must remain at the heart of
Liberal Democrat policy.
Leadership election Gordon Brown told the assembled media outside Downing Street: «
If it becomes clear that the national interest, which is stable and
principled government, which can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour party and the
Liberal Democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty to form that government which would in my view command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's speech any other confidence votes.