If marine organisms migrated similarly pre-1950s when CO2 was an insignificant player, then the most parsimonious explanation is identical migrations today are driven by the same natural forces.
If the marine organisms had been scooped up from below sea level and dumped on the elevated promontory, something much bigger than a storm surge must have pounded the coast of ancient Crete.
Not exact matches
If you are conceding that most
marine organisms died, then you face the same founding population genetic diversity constraints limiting their ability to rapidly yield the mult - itude of observable
marine vertebrate and invertebrate life in a very short time.
«Ultimately,
if we are not careful, our energy system could make the oceans corrosive to coral reefs and many other
marine organisms,» Caldeira cautions.
It can even heal itself
if it were to be damaged and due to it's high levels of dissolved oxygen it is particularly attractive to
marine organisms Th super food for our coral reefs!
If that finding stood the test of time, it would indeed be momentous; the vast clouds of tiny photosynthesizing
organisms in the seas are an important part of the carbon cycle and underpin the
marine food chain.
If the T - shirt ends up in the ocean (where plastic microfiber pollution is a very serious issue), it will also biodegrade or be consumed by
marine organisms that will digest it naturally.
If there is plenty of silicate,
marine organisms called diatoms will grow more happily.
Many studies have demonstrated the risks that ocean acidification pose to
marine organisms, such as coral dissolving in more acidic water.6 However, new findings suggest that the August and September time period could be particularly challenging for the earliest life stage of elkhorn coral — an important reef - forming coral of the Caribbean —
if we continue on a path of high carbon dioxide emissions.5 Ordinarily each August or September elkhorn corals flood the water with eggs and sperm (gametes) for sexual reproduction.2
Though the program states that
if any modified
organisms are used it would require «appropriate environmental safeguards to support future deployment,» it is highly likely that a genetically modified
marine organism released into the ocean will interbreed with an
organism of the same (or similar) species whose genes hadn't been tinkered with.
The acidification has already been measured, and
if the increasing CO2 trend continues it would come to pose a serious extinction threat to major classes of
marine organisms, including corals.
Of far greater concern than corals in particular is the ocean food chain in general, because while acidification will probably result in more oceanic dead zones as the amount of CO2 goes up and the amount of oxygen falls,
if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher
organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even
marine mammals).
For even
if the models are proven to be wrong with respect to their predictions of atmospheric warming, extreme weather, glacial melt, sea level rise, or any other attendant catastrophe, those who seek to regulate and reduce CO2 emissions have a fall - back position, claiming that no matter what happens to the climate, the nations of the Earth must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions because of projected direct negative impacts on
marine organisms via ocean acidification.