Sentences with phrase «if only water»

Wherever you look, just make sure there are comfortable chairs, available tables, a place to find refreshments of some sort, if only water, and a tolerance for a certain amount of noise.

Not exact matches

You can get into hot water only if you are right or wrong.

I would love our BrewStation coffee maker — if only it didn't have this odd little area where water collects and just sits, requiring us to clean it out every couple of days.

If you wanted to water plants in your garden and you squeezed the handle on the hose nozzle and the water only dribbled out, you'd quickly realize that a kink in the hose was restricting the flow.

The fine is around double what Chevron would have had to pay if the leak occurred in U.S. waters, and only if the company were convicted of gross negligence in relation to the spill.

This makes three weeks of regular warnings from Goldman and other banks that stocks have soared on a wing and prayer, with investors hoping for, and pricing in, something that may be forthcoming only belatedly, if at all, and only in much watered down form, and perhaps without much effect on corporate earnings after all, especially since the US corporate tax code, as it is, already provides companies countless ways to shelter their income.

There's so much social media activity that if you put a toe in the water only occasionally, you aren't likely to make vital connections.

Internships help you not only test out the waters and see if this is the career path you want to pursue, but they also to allow you gain abilities and knowledge that will boost your resume.

If a more watered - down version passes, Fisher still worries that commissioned salespeople will only be required to disclose «that they're getting a commission.

Still, even if it only has a short - term impact on prices it might muddy the water and make it a little hard to interpret the impact of copper price changes, but the price of other hard commodities, including iron ore, can help clarify the role of Chinese demand.

MaxLinear did better than all of them, if only by treading water.

only if you are thirsty or dirty does water have much value.

Artist, being referred to as sheep and Jesus is our shepherd beats hands down any day being known as fools that refuse to learn His wisdom, dry bones, wells without water, spiritually dead who only get this life with no eternity for those with big egos if they don't shelf the PRIDE, humble themselves, repent, ask Jesus for forgiveness and sin no more..

So that being said, if I think someone is delusional for their certainty in god, how do you think I feel when that same individual says «and not only that, but I have this list of 10 things he doesn't want me to do, and I know what happens when I die, and I know jesus took away our sins, and I know Mary was a virgin but got pregnant anyway, and I know he turned water into wine...» and on and on ad nauseum.

If only 2 % of the churches in America sold their buildings, and put the money toward solving the world's water crisis, we would have enough money.

So if churches in America decided that for ONE year, we would put aside only 1/3 of what we would owe the government in property taxes for that one year, we could solve the world's water crisis in one year!

If you do not believe Jesus is the only way to heaven, then, it makes it very easy to deny that water baptism is essential for salvation.

Then those that are left (surviving genocides and «nature») will get a clue and realize that only God has the ability to create the complexities of the human eye, circulatory system, the fact we have (had) the needed water and atmosphere was not a random perfection that just occurred... will change their minds and ask for forgiveness that was already granted them through Jesus, if they chose to accept it.

That would be possible only if we could emerge from the waters of baptism mature and complete in Christ --» «already there.»

Besides, if you want to use NEED as the basis for determining whether anyone is ent ¡ tled to something, you're down to protecting only 5 things: food, air, water, a reasonable temperature range, and chocolate.

As it stood, the pipeline would be only a mile from their reservation, so if it leaks, which pipelines often do, it would threaten their supply of drinking water, and could possibly disrupt their sacred burial grounds.

Hence, if water is to be raised to boiling point, it can only be on account of the cause (the fire) being itself as least as hot as 100 degrees Celsius.

The case is constructed through the patient logic of showing how any contrary construction would be absurd and impossible: blood is not, and can not be, water; hence, if there is no wine in the cup and only water is present, then the vital salvific symbol is absent; since wine «signifies the blood of Christ,» it follows that wine, which is testified to throughout Scripture, has to be present.

If we think of baptism only as getting dunked under water, Paul's statement is difficult to understand.

So when Jesus says that we must be born of Water and Spirit, and if you believe and are baptized you will be saved, I agree with you that in a strict sense God does the saving and we need only immerse (baptize) ourselves in the grace he offers us, I believe that the statement Jesus made about marriage to be applicable, «Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate» and echo Peter's rhetorical question, «Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with wWater and Spirit, and if you believe and are baptized you will be saved, I agree with you that in a strict sense God does the saving and we need only immerse (baptize) ourselves in the grace he offers us, I believe that the statement Jesus made about marriage to be applicable, «Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate» and echo Peter's rhetorical question, «Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with waterwater?

If they could only have cast their minds further back, perhaps they might have recalled a lost paradise: green and yellow meadows stirred by tender winds, umbrageous forests and emerald groves, glass - blue mountain peaks melting into azure skies, glittering bays whose diamond waters break in jade and turquoise surges on sands like powdered alabaster — where the rain falls gently, and is transformed by the setting sun into shimmering curtains of gold — where, beyond verdant valleys and limestone caves, lies a palace filled with every delight the senses can endure, enclosing garden courtyards where crystal fountains splash in porphyry basins, intoxicating perfumes hang upon the breezes, undying flowers of every hue shine out amid the greenery's blue shadows...

Neville since Jesus lives in you you may be the only Jesus people in the street get to know.Its his influence in us that has impact not a theoretic ideal of who Jesus is.Our identity is in Christ therefore we are like him or as paul said we are living epistles like a living bible that people can see who Jesus is.Just be yourself and reach out to others because you want them to know who Christ is like the woman at the well if they only knew him they would drink of the living waters you have tasted and so you know its in that experience that we can share or testify what he has done for us.brentnz

You can't have this both ways... if you believe in fact only then the only thing you can believe in is the composition of water... (based on your statement)

We woefully underestimate the power of business leaders if we think they are engaged in private enterprise, for their decisions have huge public impacts not only on their stockholders but on the jobs we need, the neighborhoods in which we live, the water we drink, the air we breathe and the schools in which we learn.

Although we probably can not imagine, given our experience with this world, a substance that would quench our thirst without having the capacity to drown us, the empirical connection between these two qualities is not a logical connection... Furthermore, if God's omnipotence is limited only by logical principles... why do we need water at all?

If God promises that He will never again destroy everything that breathes, but then in the future He does so with fire, it seems that either He is playing word games (He only meant that He wouldn't destroy with water, but fire is still an available option), or, just as with the flood, He can not stop the destruction with fire when it comes.

If you think Jesus is a good man, a good teacher, or even the son of God, but you deny that He is the only eternal Life Giver, the only Messiah Savior who gives you EVERLASTING Life, you are L O S T. Millions of professing Christians are LOST because they think its Jesus plus good works, water baptism, and / or other beliefs.

They start to realize that the water is only ankle deep; we're not going to drown if we come close enough to understand each other.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

That argument would only hold water if the fossil record was the only source of data on evolution... it's not.

Hi Amanda, I would only suggest adding water if the nut butter becomes really solid.

If additional water must be added, use only hot water.

Just want to share some valuable info (http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/california-targets-wrong-water-wasters/Content?oid=4222724) since I'm writing from Los Angeles — almond crops are currently responsible for making the current extreme draught conditions even worse because they are such a water - intensive crop in an area that does not naturally have sufficient water supply, so please consider using other nuts and seeds instead, as CA is currently the only major source of almonds in the world (if you're able to find a small, local / non-CA supplier, wonderful!).

It only takes 5 ingredients if you don't count water!

If you're lactose intolerant or just a bit «sensitive», does the thought of an oozy grilled cheese make your mouth water... only to turn your stomach?

If sourdough bread only lists whole wheat flour, water, and salt as ingredients, is it likely that it is real sourdough?

But, if you only have one or the other, definitely don't run back to the store over this, it's not like the water - packed type won't work.

I like the Tropical Traditions teeth cleaner, which only contains: purified water, organic virgin coconut oil, baking soda, xanthum gum, wildcrafted myrrh powder, stevia, and organic essential oils of cinnamon and clove, if you get the cinnamon flavor, as I do because I take homeopathics so need to avoid mint (which is surprisingly difficult to do).

An example is if you fill a 1/2 cup with 1/2 cup of water, the water comes to the top of the cup, if you transfer that 1/2 cup of water to a 1 cup measuring cup, it will only fill it halfway.

It is slightly time - consuming, as far as waiting for the water to boil, but if you have a small pot, it's only about five minutes, and 10 minutes all up!

There are a few things that could cause the caramel to be too runny: — adding water to the sugar for the caramelisation part (in this recipe, you melt and caramelise the sugar with no water added; if you do add water, it might end up runnier), — not «caramelising» the sugar enough (but that changes the consistency by only a few percent), — not cooking the butter and caramelised sugar mixture long enough (it really needs to be a few minutes), — not using double cream but whipping cream or something with a lower fat content, — not allowing the caramel to set in the fridge for a few hours (the caramel should set into a sticky layer that should be able to be cut and isn't runny).

i understand reducing water activity in ganaches in order to lengthen shelf life, but if it is only water and chocolate, what is there to cause mold and bacteria growth?

If you put the same 1/2 cup of water in a 1 cup measuring cup it will only fill it 50 % and will only be 1/2 full in height.

The only change I'd make is to cut the amount of soy sauce (maybe 1/2 soy sauce 1/2 water) if using vegetable broth because they are a bit salty.

Next blend the avocado with the cashew mixture, only adding water if absolutely necessary.