Besides the risk, there is the more vexing (to lawyers) question:
If plaintiffs counsel finds out about the blog, should she use it at trial?
I also see the risk that costs penalties might not be delivered
if plaintiff counsel does proceed in Supreme Court and gets only small claims awards, because a judge might view the plaintiff's fear of losing an advocate as «sufficient reason» to proceed in the only forum where an advocate is permitted.
Not exact matches
That said — I have no idea
if plaintiff's
counsel has the chops / expierence to play that game at this level and be self assured enough not to step in it.
Having regard to institutional fairness will send the message that the court will not approve a settlement
if through misadventure, incompetence, opportunism, lassitude, or fatigue the Representative
Plaintiff and Class
Counsel do not achieve a settlement that is truly fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of class members.
In addition, the
Plaintiff's
counsel refers the
Plaintiff to a vocational rehabilitation consultant who has opined that given the
Plaintiff's age, injuries and ongoing pain, she is completely unemployable, and
if she were employable, she would not be a productive employee given the fatigue, depression and anxiety that she suffers from.
Plaintiff's counsel replied on September 21, 2011 indicating that if the trial could be heard in Provincial Court in the same time frame as the trial date set in Supreme Court — March 2012 — then the plaintiff would consider the request for a
Plaintiff's
counsel replied on September 21, 2011 indicating that
if the trial could be heard in Provincial Court in the same time frame as the trial date set in Supreme Court — March 2012 — then the
plaintiff would consider the request for a
plaintiff would consider the request for a transfer.
Undoubtedly, this
if a consideration that both
plaintiff and defence
counsel should be aware of moving forward.
Based on the Garacci v Ross decision,
if the defence lawyer brings a motion for the production of social media evidence, the
Plaintiff's
counsel should prepare an Affidavit summarizing what each photograph depicts on their Facebook profile.
If the matter continues to the motion,
Plaintiff's
counsel should then present the Affidavit and a sealed envelope with the Facebook photographs for the Judge or Master to determine the relevance of the posts.
[25]
Counsel for the
plaintiff argued that, even
if there was no collision, the defendant driver's own evidence shows that he was negligent and that a sudden stop was capable of causing the
plaintiff's soft tissue injuries.
«According to the defense motion, filed by attorneys at Moore & Riemenschneider, Piccolo (
plaintiff) testified she had a Facebook account and was asked at deposition
if the defense
counsel could send a «neutral friend request» to Piccolo so that he could review the Facebook postings Piccolo testified she made every day.»
If you are
plaintiff counsel, you can tailor your report to reflect your potential client's circumstances, and run a Win / Loss comparison to see case precedents.
If the
plaintiff's
counsel had noticed that the facts of the case could warrant punitive damages earlier in the proceedings, the
plaintiff could have received a larger verdict or settlement offer.
«First,
if his cover is blown and
plaintiff's
counsel finds out he has been blogging, he can be cross-examined on those contacts and advice that he wrote about, for the privilege disappears when the substance is discussed publicly.
Class
counsel Sam Marr and David Fogel of Landy Marr Kats LLP said that the decision «reflects the economic realities of workers in today's economic climate» and «it would be a loss to all workers
if a new representative
plaintiff is not found resulting in the dismissal of this action.»
Counsel for the
plaintiff indicated that it was not the
plaintiff's intention to proceed with the arbitration
if this action was allowed to proceed.
However,
if plaintiffs refuse to answer whether they have Trial Insurance, defence
counsel may bring a motion and / or application for an order compelling the
plaintiffs to answer, and also to produce the policy itself.8
Instead,
if settling the dispute is the goal, then defense
counsel should not be openly dismissive of the
plaintiff's injuries, but instead make the
plaintiff feel heard by employing the tactics discussed above.
If an attorney is familiar with products liability defense in the Commonwealth and the elements of a breach of implied warranty claim, the question is not as difficult to answer as
plaintiff's
counsel might hope.
His decision to walk this high - wire without a net brings us to a third issue:
If plaintiff's
counsel finds out about the blog, should it be used at trial?
The MLG arrangement discourages maximum commitment on behalf of the class because even
if class
counsel should win at trial, they will not be entitled to any compensation, whether from the recovery (no such agreement is in place) or via the
plaintiff's claim for costs (no costs can be awarded because the representative
plaintiff has no liability to pay legal expenses.
The court granted the motion, but inquired in its written order: «[d] oes Defendant think it is ok
if Plaintiff's
counsel makes a categorical statement that is incorrect — after counting to ten?
Counsel for the
Plaintiff submitted that, although the
Plaintiff has a very accommodating employer,
if she were to retire, then it would be unlikely that a new employer would be so accommodating.
[246] I can not envisage Dr. Cox having given any different opinion
if his opinion had been sought either by the
plaintiff or by defence
counsel in cross-examination.
Furthermore, even
if a case is able to be heard in a federal mass tort MDL proceeding, some
plaintiffs»
counsel file thousands of advertising - generated claims without properly investigating those claims» legitimacy.
Four months after being terminated the
plaintiff received a letter from the union's legal
counsel requesting that he «return to his employment... to serve out the balance of his notice period of 24 months» and stating that,
if he refused to return, the union would «treat that refusal as just cause, and formally terminate him without notice».
(d) On the last day of each month, the
plaintiff's counsel will be required to deliver to defendant's counsel a statement indicating whether the Plaintiff has earned any income during that month and if so, how
plaintiff's
counsel will be required to deliver to defendant's
counsel a statement indicating whether the
Plaintiff has earned any income during that month and if so, how
Plaintiff has earned any income during that month and
if so, how much; and
If a major corporation cheats a thousand of its workers out of a thousand dollars each, very few of them will decide it is worth the hassle and expense of a major lawsuit, and virtually no lawyer will be willing to take such a low dollar case on a contingency fee basis — meaning that the
plaintiffs will have to pay more for legal
counsel than they are likely to win in the end.
AS
COUNSEL FOR A
PLAINTIFF, AN ATTORNEY MAY NOT ETHICALLY INTERVIEW PRESENT OR FORMER EMPLOYEES OF A DEFENDANT CORPORATION
IF: (a) THE EMPLOYEES
Although the reason for this holding makes good and under - appreciated sense from a retributivist perspective — a person ought not be punished for conduct that has not been clearly proven to be the defendant's culpable misconduct, es - pecially
if the defendant has various defenses that could be raised as against particular claimants — the new holding poses a substantial risk of reducing incentives to
plaintiffs and their
counsel because they can not pursue a jackpot of punitive damages based on «total harm.»
If a jurisdiction decided (against my advice offered below) to allocate the retribu - tive damages awards to the
plaintiff and her
counsel, then the reprehensibility - based guide - lines approach reduces the problem of diminished incentives in the aftermath of Philip Morris.
In the course of argument,
counsel for the
plaintiff acknowledged that
if the jurisdictional basis for the granting of the injunction is not considered on appeal there will be no occasion on which the issue will be revisited in the underlying litigation.
«It's a small bar in Canada, and we see the same
plaintiff counsel over and over and so you have to be mindful, especially
if you're a big employer where they know who you are and they think of you as a deep pocket,» she said.
Plaintiff counsel should further consider potential violations of privacy under the California Constitution to establish standing, particularly
if a defendant continued to engage in robocalls after being instructed to stop.
Counsel for the Respondents (plaintiffs) would not have filed for reconsideration if counsel thought there was no merit to the new grounds that the plaintiffs planned to argue if the case had been re
Counsel for the Respondents (
plaintiffs) would not have filed for reconsideration
if counsel thought there was no merit to the new grounds that the plaintiffs planned to argue if the case had been re
counsel thought there was no merit to the new grounds that the
plaintiffs planned to argue
if the case had been remitted.
D. GPM is given the authority to opt the Client out of any class action proceeding relating to the claims authorized herein and / or pursue the Client claim individually in a group action,
if the Client is not appointed Lead
Plaintiff and GPM is not appointed Class
Counsel.
Furthermore,
plaintiff was not significantly disadvantaged by the lack of
counsel because she could have obtained equal parenting time with her children
if she had only agreed to it.