Sentences with phrase «if premises»

Additional living expenses (ALE) coverage allows tenants to stay in a hotel if the premises become uninhabitable, which can help you retain a good renter.

If the premises are in severe disrepair, you might find getting covered to be challenging.

If the premises are not «reasonably clean» then the tenant might be responsible for the costs of cleaning.

For example, if the premises has been destroyed, a tenant's only option is to terminate the tenancy.

Equally, a weekly, monthly or yearly periodic tenancy will not be a term certain and so, if the premises are used for business purposes, will be LTA 1954 protected.

If a premises owner or operator has been negligent and caused your injuries, then they should be held responsible and we can help you get justice.

They also have large kitchens that include electricity and gas lines, so you might end up getting hurt if the premises aren't managed properly.

If the premises was dangerous in some way and it caused you to have an accident and you were invited onto that property then this is a reason to make a premises liability claim with a Kansas City personal injury attorney.

If premises liability case caused a wrongful death or broken bone, the case and damages will be more severe.

If a syllogism be regular in mood and figure, and if the premises be true, the conclusion is infallible.

You can see where I'm going with this [I'm tying bigger and more complicated knots:)-RSB- If the premises that (a) «CO2 trapping heat» causes the temperature to rise, and (b) CO2 traps heat independent of the temperature of the Earth's surface are valid, then a CO2 atmosphere should cause the Earth surface temperature to rise without bound.

It doesn't matter where in the UK they come from or if premises are licensed or unlicensed the dogs are all the same; broken, defeated, worn out and suspicious of anyone who approaches.

If the premises are in severe disrepair, you might find getting covered to be challenging.

A valid argument - if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

The idea is that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.

A deductive argument is one which provides conclusive proof of its conclusions - if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true as well.

[2] The individual components of a circular argument will sometimes be logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, and will not lack relevance...»

This statement is obscure, but it should be pointed out that if the premises are inconsistent, then of course all statements of the language follow from them.

There should be no reason why anybody has to compromise — if the premises are consistent and people can sensibly buy into them in this day and age.

The logic is valid, as in, if the premises are true then the conclusion must be true.

@kevin7harris, Even if your premises are true, which is not a given, you logic only points to one posibility, i.e. not a proof.

If the premise is unproven or not defined, then perfect logic applied to them draws unproven conclusions.

But it illustrates how, when you start from a premise you can build an entire mythos around that premise, even if that premise has no basis in reality.

If you have no way to tell if a premise is true you can't tell if the conclusion is true either.

However, if a premise is faulty, it is the responsibility of the opponent to prove it false.

What is evident to you, may well be satan messing with your head... equal chance, if your premise is assumed.

If the premise is illogical or unsupported no amount of susequent logical reasoning can justify the premise.

If this premise produces in the theist a noticeable attitude change, perhaps it's because you're getting close to the central nervous system of his god - belief.

With a few notable exceptions, most congregations are still organized as if the premise of «the family pew» is true — that church members are Christian because they learn Christian attitudes at home, knowledge of the Bible in Sunday School, and attend worship regularly.

As Alvin Plantinga noted later (the link is no longer available), even if the premise were true, there's quite an embarrassingly large jump from there to the conclusion.

But if Premise X is logically false, no such power could be exercised.

And note, a being that is omnipotent on this selective view might exist even if Premise X turned out to be meaningless, logically false, or metaphysically false.

I'm not saying it would be a God - established theocracy, but why would the founding fathers protect our right to follow the wrong religions, if that premise were true?

The other issue not really discussed is that if the premise is that KH got over on these other GMs then that would at least point to the fact that either our organization / system helped these players put up their numbers or that the broader view is these players (i.e. Smith) aren't as good as the Wings organization / leadership thought they were in the first place.

I suppose too that if the premise of one's book is green and natural healthcare, then why defend the choice not to breastfeed?

As a case point, if that premise were untrue, Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg could have never been elected Mayor of NYC.

And if that premise is true, the rest follows logically.

Even if the premise is far - fetched, its been always been well written, and each season has a distinct and engaging conflict.

Don't be duped, if this premise sounds at all appealing, for Delta Farce is easily one of the worst films released this year.

So even if the premise doesn't quite stand up to scrutiny, it's packed...

Even if the premise is tired, this grim thriller holds the attention by focussing on the raw intensity of the characters» personal lives.

If the premise is familiar (the nice - guy innocent forced to become ruthless lawbreaker to survive) the execution and evocation of the gritty nocturnal Paris underworld makes is zing.

The parade of punctuation that follows «Really» when the title is displayed at the start of Jay Chandrasekhar's sitcom might well warn you off — but if the premise screams «same old», the cast at least bring something fairly new to the table.

Even if the premise of the movie Zombieland didn't have too many more layers than that, it was original in its shambling, anxiety - ridden humor.

If that premise sounds a little silly, it's because it is.

If the premise already triggers your aversion to the contrived application of disease and highway adventure to matters of the heart, Italian director / co-screenwriter Paolo Virzi's adaptation of Michael Zadoorian's novel — his first English - language film — won't add anything to your wariness other than trite situations and shallow insight.

But if the premise is... Look, I fight battles all day long, and really it's not my fight, but the impression I have is that the idea of an embargo is to maximise interest in a film by ensuring that reviews come out close to release.

If the premise makes it sound like Glazer's sold out and made a commercial horror / sci - fi genre picture, you couldn't be more wrong — this is the filmmaker at his most experimental and unfiltered, with stunning images that of all three of his films to date, is most reminiscent of his unforgettable commercials work (more on this below).

But if the premise of Rabbit Hole is generic, the honesty, acuity, and restraint of the execution — not to mention its dry gallows humor — are not.

It is somewhat entertaining even if its premise is not realized and the comic antics fall short.