If a society wants to lawyers, other than prosecutors, to put any interest of others ahead of their duties to the client, then society will have to change the definition of a lawyer's duty.
If society wants to put a stop to this problem, better care needs to be paid to the foods we are putting in our mouths.
So
if society wants to prevent people from littering, they pass a law preventing littering (making it «criminal») rather than just prosecute litterers without a law.
NAH: «Under your view,
if society wants to oppress Jews, it may.
Under your view,
if society wants to oppress Jews, it may.
Not exact matches
Call me unreasonable
if you
want, but I do not believe
society has lost much from the suspension of the releases of federal government economic statistics.
If you
want to leave a legacy and give back to
society, you need to make some smart decisions along the way.
And
if we
wanted to spend some time on the suject, we could probably find numerous other examples of census data being historically (and,
if you believe the New York Times - that agent of the Harper government - presently) misused by governments, often to the significant prejudice of minority members of those
societies.
To be honest I wouldn't even
want to make a profit because I think it would be so great
if this social service existed in every civilised
society.
Still, it's a depressing indictment of American
society that she felt that simply going to a powerful man's hotel suite meant she had to have sex with him
if he
wanted to.
If you
want to be part of modern - day
society, you have to wear clothes.
«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the
society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends,
if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say
if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who
wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»
If you are one of them and genuinely
want to contribute to
society rather than only counting the profit, a good option can be to open a fresh fruit juice stall.
If you truely
want to live in a godless morally decrebit
society, go to China or Russian.
«Dear
Society,
If you think a woman in a tan vinyl bra and underwear, grabbing her crotch and grinding up on a dance partner is raunchy, trashy, and offensive but you don't think her dance partner is raunchy, trashy, or offensive as he sings a song about «blurred» lines of consent and propagating rape culture, then you may
want to reevaluate your acceptance of double standards and your belief in stereotypes about how men vs. women «should» and are «allowed» to behave.
So
if God understood Adam's lonliness maybe it makes sense he created Eve for partnership first and foremost, not for some sexual activity (as our
society seems to
want to think).
IF he
wanted to send a signal that men should be in charge always, the more progressive the
society, the more liberated their women, the more such instructions and warnings would be required.
So
if the NAACP
wants to exclude KKK members from their organization, can
society force them to accept the KKK instead?
If the
society produces highly educated,
wanted children, wouldn't that reduce the stresses associated with poverty and unwanted pregnancies?
«
If we're
wanting a
society in which everybody feels truly home, our public events must be symbolised in a slightly different way.
But since it isn't helpful for
society to have stupid people raising children (especially
if they don't have the fiscal means to do so), I
want that stupid women to have an abortion.
«Conscience» is not a matter of determining what I
want to do and then doing it; «conscience» is my search for truths that can be known to be true and then binding myself to those truths, which stand in judgment on me and on
society: «
If, in keeping with the prevailing modern idea, conscience is reduced to the subjective field to which religion and morality have been banished, then the crisis of the West has no remedy and Europe is destined to collapse upon itself.
Common sense would dictate that
if the people of a large
society wanted to pay less to house criminals,
wanted fewer abortions, and more people working — they would put their resources towards educating their youth on how to not get pregnant, providing contraception to those women who do not
want children until they are equipped to raise them, and towards making sure all children obtain the highest possible education they can achieve.
he is there to forgive
if people repent, but he is also is a just God and will punish sin no matter what secular
society wants to teach
If christians
want to force their will on
society, they have to expect that people will push back.
If marriage is a cornerstone of our
society, aren't gay couples that
want to be married affirming the value on monogamous commitment as the building block of healthy and sustainable families and communities?
If they
want to participate as business owners or service providers in the life of that
society, they must give ground.
First, its premisses concerning
society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but
if they still
want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day
society.)
If you are not experiencing opposition in this life as a Christian than you need to take another look at the truth that the Bible and Christ taught... Jesus was a revolutionary figure who opposed the
society and people that he lived with... He was not a person who was sugary sweet... and He didn't tell people what they
wanted to hear... as Scripture says, the path to heaven is narrow and Few choose it... the road to hell is wide and most are following that path.
Even crucifixion has nothing on what some
societies in our not so distant past dished out as capital punishment.I don't wish to depict those methods here because
if you desire you can look them up for yourself and be sick as a dog
if you
want.
Now,
if we all followed God's Holy standards for living, which are basically the Ten Commandments, we wouldn't be having this issue where each group of people
wants to have representation no matter how safe or unsafe their agendas are on
society.
If you
want to see what is so wrong with
society in America read his post and recognize what unfounded prejudice is about.
DeeCee, do not worry and no need to feel sorry
if you can not see the link between all the various factions and groups in
society who do not
want to change only the man in the mirror but the man in your mirror... and
if you do not
want to change they will discomfort you to do it.
If you
want to truly fuck up a
society, all you need to do is introduce it to islam.
for every priest that violated his vows and the trust of his parishioners there will someday be a reckoning... true the head always suffers for his members that go astray... but the Brits don't understand the Catholic church
if they think that we are going to accept practicing man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else coming... If the Brits want to live in a perverse society where every thing goes that their moral problem
if they think that we are going to accept practicing man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else coming...
If the Brits want to live in a perverse society where every thing goes that their moral problem
If the Brits
want to live in a perverse
society where every thing goes that their moral problem!!
If you
want our
societies to degenerate into a dog - eat - dog free - for - all that ruins everything, then don't use your natural gift of empathy and just look away whenever you encounter suffering.
If certain changes within our
society would happen... would you really
want to bet that it «can not» happen?
Okay, what
if someone who heads up a skeptics
society, or the president of an atheist organization said that they
wanted to try theism?
So
if something is happening in the community, in the wider
society or internationally, I
want us to reflect on that.
If she is going to spout Bible versus and religious beliefs into her political roles, why wouldn't they and everyone else
want to know how that would affect them and every other member of American
society?
People move away from God because they
want to decide what is right and wrong, as
if they were God or the end all wise authority of what
society should do.
Not a chance... even
if people
wanted such a dysfunctional
society, which they don't.
The fact remains, however, that
if society doesn't
want to be compassionate they can (under your view) do what they please.
If all Muslims living in the US
want to become part of an accepting
society one would think they would show sensitivity for the lives lost in lower Manhattan 10 years ago and not build in its shadow.
I think this secular
society provides counseling services that might help you, but of course only
if you
wanted to be helped.
@digitalcntrl
If you
want to talk about the rights of women, then don't be a hypocrite and go fix your own
society first.
It does not reflect prevailing patterns of human behavior...
If you look around carefully, you will see that most people are not really maximizers, but instead what you might call «satisfiers»: they
want to satisfy their needs, and that means being in equilibrium with oneself, with other people, with
society and with nature.
If he
wants to be respected and well like in
society, he needs to hang out with different people.
Even
if that role is not as significant as it once was, many Americans continue to
want their
society and their politics infused with moral commitment.
I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to
WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a
society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way,
if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)