(15)
If standardized test scores form a substantial part of a school or a teacher's evaluation, there is likely to be considerable pressure to align other measures with the test score data.
Not exact matches
And especially in this moment when we really care a lot about accountability in schools, there has been an increasing emphasis on finding measures — like a student's
standardized test scores — to tell us
if a teacher is a good teacher.
The original act held schools accountable to minimum percentages of proficient students, as measured by
scores on
standardized tests, with the threat of sanctions, including school closure,
if they failed.
The law allowed for exceptions to the retention policy
if a student had limited English proficiency or a severe disability,
scored above the 51st percentile on the Stanford - 9
standardized test, had demonstrated proficiency through a performance portfolio, or had already been held back for two years.
Tileston, D.) has clearly established that students will achieve higher
scores on
standardized tests if they know the vocabulary of the standards.
• too much school time is given over to
test prep — and the pressure to lift
scores leads to cheating and other unsavory practices; • subjects and accomplishments that aren't
tested — art, creativity, leadership, independent thinking, etc. — are getting squeezed
if not discarded; • teachers are losing their freedom to practice their craft, to make classes interesting and stimulating, and to act like professionals; • the curricular homogenizing that generally follows from
standardized tests and state (or national) standards represents an undesirable usurpation of school autonomy, teacher freedom, and local control by distant authorities; and • judging teachers and schools by pupil
test scores is inaccurate and unfair, given the kids» different starting points and home circumstances, the variation in class sizes and school resources, and the many other services that schools and teachers are now expected to provide their students.
Students can receive college credit for such courses
if they
score high enough on
standardized tests.
I would welcome the opportunity to determine who on my staff would receive differentiated pay, especially
if value - added student achievement and
standardized test scores are tracked as a part of the measurement.
State accountability systems focus attention and resources on low performance and remediation, but in many school districts across the country district leaders are as much concerned,
if not more, about sustaining good performance and about establishing agendas for student learning beyond proficiency
scores on
standardized tests.
If passed, this will take what was the state's teacher evaluation system requirement that 20 % of an educator's evaluation be based on «locally selected measures of achievement,» to a system whereas teachers» value - added as based on growth on the state's (Common Core)
standardized test scores will be set at 50 %.
By contrast, practices don't have to worry that they'll lose their jobs
if students»
scores on
standardized tests don't rise year over year.
Your chances of getting into a highly selective school that requires
standardized test scores will be greatly reduced
if your
scores are well below the norm for the school.
There is also a flexibility rule that allows students with a minimum 2.75 to still be certified
if they achieve a
score on the required
standardized Praxis
test that is at least 10 percent higher than the minimum passing
score.
And
if that were not enough, our lives revolve around
testing — the overwhelming amount and the offensive misuse of
scores from high - stakes
standardized tests.
Race to the Top: President Obama's Race to the Top (RttT) initiative helped (and continues to help) to distribute billions of dollars in federal stimulus monies to states, thus far to a total of $ 4.35 billion,
if states promise via their legislative policies that they will use students» large - scale
standardized test scores for even more consequential purposes than NCLB required prior.
No one has any idea
if a high
score on a Common Core - aligned
standardized test will result in a student being successful in college or in a career.
Joel Klein is right...
if we accept that the only learning outcomes that matter are those which are directly related to Math and ELA
standardized test scores.
The studies, both by the Community College Research Center at Teachers College, Columbia University, found that as many as a third of students sidetracked into remedial classes because of their
scores on
standardized tests would have earned a B or better
if they had simply proceeded directly to college - level courses.
To account for the limitations of the
tests, Louisiana allows an exception
if students
score between one and a half and two standard deviations above the mean on three separate
tests: the IQ
test and the
standardized math and English exams.
The Wisconsin proposal, however, is limited to children who are
scoring in the top 5 percent of
standardized tests or have been identified «by an education official» as being gifted and talented «
if a student demonstrates evidence of high - performance capability in intellectual, creative, artistic, leadership or specific academic areas and needs services or activities not ordinarily provided in a regular school program.»
Further,
if schools are identified as failing primarily by their
standardized test scores, the percentage of misidentified schools will be unacceptably large.»
If the power of solidarity is going to reclaim our schools, more affluent, predominantly white activists will need to develop an anti-racist understanding of the movement against standardized testing and the barriers that communities of color face to joining — including the very real fear from parents of color that their children's schools will be shut down if they don't encourage them to score well on the test
If the power of solidarity is going to reclaim our schools, more affluent, predominantly white activists will need to develop an anti-racist understanding of the movement against
standardized testing and the barriers that communities of color face to joining — including the very real fear from parents of color that their children's schools will be shut down
if they don't encourage them to score well on the test
if they don't encourage them to
score well on the
tests.
If teacher evaluations are going to be dependent, at least in part, on
standardized test scores, then certainly superintendent evaluation should be dependent, at least in part, on how well they do handling
standardized per unit expenditures.
And think about this:
If teachers are evaluated on
test scores, there has to be
standardized test for every class.
The Democratic Assembly Speaker, for example, said that «he's always been troubled that teachers are rated on
standardized test scores,» more specifically noting: «I don't think any single teacher that I've talked to would shirk away from being held accountable... [b] ut
if they're going to be held accountable, they want to be held accountable for things that... reflect their actual work.»
Contrary to Mr. Villar's assertion, there is little,
if any, evidence to support the idea that including
standardized test scores in teacher evaluations will close the so - called achievement gap.
Did I mention these schools
score well on
standardized tests and other metrics (let's face it,
if they've got their act together and have developed a reputation, they do just about everything better....
If Charter schools educate children who are less poor, have fewer language barriers and few special education needs, they will, by default, end up with high
standardized test scores.
[12]
If we want value - added
scores to yield information about teaching beyond what is currently measured by
standardized tests, we must use a
test that measures knowledge we value.
If the announcement is as impressive as suggested, it would mean that the leadership of Connecticut's teacher unions have finally moved 180 degrees from the position they held on January 25, 2012 when the CEA and AFT joined with the other members of Governor Malloy's Performance Evaluation Advisory Council (PEAC) to approve the so - called «teacher evaluation framework» that inappropriately and unfairly mandates that student's
standardized test scores be a major factor in the teacher evaluation process.
Thus,
if California were to keep these old rules, a school that should be applauded for its strong gains for English learners would fall in the «red zone» on the display developed by the state to indicate how a school is doing on a number of measures, including
standardized test scores.
Another key indicator of success will be
if more students, and particularly high - needs students, are not just
scoring better on
standardized tests but are graduating at a higher rate.
Broadly speaking, the idea is that
if more kids graduate from high school, and achieve higher
scores on
standardized tests, then more young people are likely to go to college, and, in turn, land jobs that can secure them spots in the middle class.
If recent news of California's lackluster
standardized test scores was sobering, just wait until individual student results reach household mailboxes.
If test score are determinant, and if you want to keep teaching, then you have to alter the place standardized testing assumes in your instructional priorit
If test score are determinant, and
if you want to keep teaching, then you have to alter the place standardized testing assumes in your instructional priorit
if you want to keep teaching, then you have to alter the place
standardized testing assumes in your instructional priority.
«Connecticut students could see a different
standardized test next year and teachers might not see the
test scores used in their evaluations,
if federal officials give the OK.
If a student can achieve a proficient
score on the state
standardized tests (and pass a writing
test in many... Read More
The one thing we do know is that
if Bridgeport's
standardized tests scores go down or student grades suffer, it has nothing to do with the teachers, the fault will lie directly with the outside administrators who have come in and screwed things up even more.
A widely acknowledged flaw of the No Child Left Behind Law is that its accountability system based on inaccurate and narrow
standardized test scores unfairly, even
if unintentionally, labels schools and students as failures.
It's generally true that schools consider a wide range of factors in admission, and
standardized -
test scores become more important
if they are very low or
if schools have other reservations or considerations about the student.
Standardized tests, even
if scored turned around quickly, provide far too little information to be of much use in this process.
And
if teachers are undermining accountability they must be doing a pretty poor job of it — we live in a time of unbelievable obsession with
standardized testing, and teacher evaluation systems based on
test scores of subjects that most teachers don't even teach — and from students they don't even know.
I am not sure
if Elsa is really a good student
if one is measuring by
standardized test scores and / or performance on classroom exams, but she could be one of those students who becomes a success in life — like some corporate founders and wealthy people who simply followed their dreams and desires.
After all —
if accountability to a classroom teacher means they are at risk of losing their job
if students perform poorly on
standardized tests — then what is the reason
scores of library media specialists are losing their jobs across the country?
If you have applied for the loan within four years of your graduation date, you must also provide your
standardized test scores results.
Rather than look at your credit history — which may be short depending on your age, or nebulous depending on such things as identity theft — UpStart calculates credit worthiness based on your career (for example, a lawyer is deemed more credit worthy than, say, an actor), your educational status, your job status (obviously,
if you're employed, you're more credit worthy than someone who isn't) and
standardized test scores to determine
if you're worthy of a loan from them.
For example,
if you're interviewing for a position as a teacher, your big picture question might relate to the school's
standardized testing scores.