Sentences with phrase «if subjects said»

If subjects said the first trait failed why online dating fails describe them, they were more likely to say the same of subsequent traits presented to them.

If subjects said the first trait failed to

If subjects said that one lizard was faster than the other, the game started over, with the «faster» lizard slowed down ever so slightly.

Not exact matches

If you do claim early, those extra years will also be subject to taxation, said Ronald L. Myers, managing member at Fortune 360 Group in Plantation, Florida.

If the EU is subject to tariffs on the 6.4 billion euros ($ 7.7 billion) of the metals it exports annually to the United States, it has said it will set its own duties on 2.8 billion euros of U.S. exports of products ranging from makeup to motorcycles.

This one, sent by «Barack Obama,» has the semi-stalker-ish subject line «If I don't call you» and says Obama will contact donors this week to thank them for contributing to his campaign before the end of the third quarter.

And if you're paying your employees in Bitcoin, the IRS says that pay is now subject to withholding taxes based on the virtual currency's fair market value.

«If I harvest $ 10,000 in losses every year and I do that for a decade, I created another $ 100,000 in capital gains that will be subject to tax because I've systematically lowered my cost basis by the same amount,» Kitces said.

He did not approach a new subject that interested him and say «Gee, if I pursue this new study, I will never be a true master in any of my other studies.

Nothing Plus Nothing David Heinemeier Hansson and Jason Fried of 37Signals say «free» thinking will never amount to real business If you want to get Jason Fried riled, all you have to do is bring up the subject of giving your products away.

«Our point is that if you are working and you are subject to rules that employees are subject to, then you are also need to have the rights that our legislature has said employees should have as well.»

A spokeswoman for the provincial regulator says it sometimes warns the public about possible harmful activity in progress but doesn't disclose when or if it's actively investigating a subject.

«If a certain number of employees exercise their options, the company becomes a de facto public company, subject to securities laws,» says Corey Rosen of the National Center for Employee Ownership.

«I would suspect that if you're an American citizen traveling back and forth to Libya you're likely to be subjected to further questioning when you come into an airport,» he said.

«If you know a lot about wine or nutrition or salsa dancing or email marketing or any of a million other subjects, people who care about that topic are sure to be interested in what you have to say.»

If you need a response, make it clear in the subject line by saying «please reply» or «thoughts needed on X topic.»

Especially if you're sending a marketing email, Kipp Bodnar, a VP at marketing software platform HubSpot, says it should be focused on one action, which should be communicated in the subject line.

«Even if you have a product that's in beta, you're still subject to liability laws,» said Jenn Wall, corporate counsel at X (formerly GoogleX), without mentioning any company names.

Says Katz, «Even if everything happened in Canada and would be subject to communication with the public by telecommunication, the fact that one crucial aspect of the activity takes place in the U.S. makes it unclear whose copyright laws apply.»

Galloway said companies like Uber — with a valuation of $ 70 billion according to recent company press releases — would likely be worth much less if subjected to the scrutiny of the public market.

«He didn't disclose it and, if the omission was intentional, he could be subject to civil or criminal penalties,» Potter said.

«I might lose whatever credibility I have with readers if I suggested flat out that a book centered around the subject of oil, written by an economist, was a page - turner, but I am willing to say with conviction that Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller, by former CIBC Chief Economist Jeff Rubin, is a fantastically compelling read.

My work on blogs like iAcquire has been an enormous part of establishing myself as both a credible subject matter expert and a talented writer (if I can say so myself).

«Subject to a renegotiation of terms by us — we're going to renegotiate some of the terms — and if they'd like, we'll see if we can get that pipeline built,» Mr. Trump said.

The IRS also has gone on to say that if the situation is indeed dire, the taxpayers who have sought to hide their cryptocurrency earnings from the IRS can actually be subjected to proper criminal prosecution if they do not report their earnings.

«Most of the companies over the past eighteen months that have been creating these ICOs have been trying to pitch themselves as, what I would call, utility tokens, which means they're not subject to normal SEC registration or the normal rules that your investments would have to go through if they listed at AngelList for example,» said Barhydt.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

«If they're going to restore public confidence in this marketplace and if they're going to create the kind of reforms necessary, they're going to have to recognize the old days of just doing what they want, being subject to lawsuits now and then, are over,» he saiIf they're going to restore public confidence in this marketplace and if they're going to create the kind of reforms necessary, they're going to have to recognize the old days of just doing what they want, being subject to lawsuits now and then, are over,» he saiif they're going to create the kind of reforms necessary, they're going to have to recognize the old days of just doing what they want, being subject to lawsuits now and then, are over,» he said.

The DOL is saying that if you sell the product that dominates the income annuity or dominates the deferred income annuity, it's better in terms of payout and you're subject to all this regulation.

If you think it does, all I can say is do some research on the subject and open your eyes.

When you read the context and see that Paul was speaking on the subject of those who don't believe in the resurrection, but believed in baptism as Christians, you realize that he was saying that what is the point of baptism if you are only going to end up dead.

If you want to say God was immoral you could argue subjecting the Chosen Ones to 430 years of brutal oppressive slavery in Egypt was immoral.

Amen TB, and regardless of how you interpret scriptures on the subject of sin, we have all sinned and if we say we have no sin, then we lie.

If he was «lukewarm and wishy - washy» then you wouldn't have any reason to post a comment opposing what he has to say about the subject.

While I don't subscribe to even a majority of Barfield's views on other subjects, as a poet I have to say that his views on the nature, development, and purpose of language ring true.Don't know if any of this makes sense, but there it is.

The Bible gives council on tihs subject, it says «Repent» and in Matthew 16:24 «Jesus said to his disciples, «If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.»

When I use the word «subjective» I mean that which is defined by a person (subject) or people; when I say «objective» I mean that which exists apart from any person or people, regardless of how or if that objectively existing reality might be known.

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

So what you are trying to say is that your god has taken over from all the other 3500 + gods and because some translation of some old bs I am one of his subjects — truly you are deranged if you believe that sh!t.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

My doubts, they say, would vanish if I would just subject my tradition, reason, and experience to the authority of Scripture.

If that is your stance on the subject then you can not say without being hypocritical that all Christian dictators who murdered many people did so because they were Christian.

But no one book can cover everything, and perhaps the writer will readily be excused if he, a single author, does not try to say everything that is to be said on any one subject, or even everything that is in his own mind!

(157) ``... Based on our research on this subject,» he says, «we must realize that our political activism, if expressed in an unChristian manner, prevents a new generation from seeing Christ.»

If, therefore, we discuss future human structures and institutions of the Church which would make possible a more active participation of the laity in the decisions of ecclesiastical authorities, such efforts should not be discredited in advance by saying that they would remain in any case subject to the good pleasure of the hierarchy.

On Tuesday, January 17th, former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich said that the only way he would ever support a Muslim for the presidency of the United States is if that person would «commit in public to give up sharia» thereby continuing his trend to exhibit his ignorance on the subject of Islamic law (sharia) as well as his ignorance of the United States Constitution.

I know Sabio, you have a lot to say on the subject, so go for it, if you feel like it, but maybe try not to say how stupid they all are, we might as well all pray to the tooth fairies or spaghetti monster.

I hear / read a lot of people who say most if not all of the usual scriptures on the subject are actually about Jesus coming in judgement of jerusalem in 70 ad.

If you are familiar with the most current literature on the subject then you will agree with me when I say your statement is speculative at best.

For if in this principle, as I contend, Whitehead is using «to constitute» in the sense of «to create», then he is there saying what we should indeed expect him to be saying, namely, that the subject is the genetic process whereby the superjective product, or satisfaction, comes to be.