Sentences with phrase «if teachers teach»

If teachers teach down to a lower grade level, then students won't be ready for annual assessments and will fall further behind.

If her teachers taught her that she was ok taking those things, those teachers were wrong.

Maybe if the teachers taught about all the world's religions, there would be more tolerance within the world.

If a teacher teaches more than one course / grade, each additional course / grade is available at approximately half - price.

If all teachers taught in «sound bites,» with active student participation between «bites,» what changes do you think you would see in student achievement and behavior?

Not exact matches

If you do not feel like you are making enough progress via self - teaching or if you prefer to learn from a professional, you can seek out a xylophone teacheIf you do not feel like you are making enough progress via self - teaching or if you prefer to learn from a professional, you can seek out a xylophone teacheif you prefer to learn from a professional, you can seek out a xylophone teacher.

If you like videos and interacting with your teachers, look for online webinars, both live and recorded, as valuable teaching tools.

The teachers at Pure Barre Westport, where I take and now teach, are such rock stars and I thought, if I could do that I'd be a rock star too!

The owner and a couple of the other teachers had asked me a few times if I'd consider teaching, but I kept hemming and hawing because I do have a primary career, which is writing a novel every nine months.

If you are a teacher who does not teach during the summer months, otherwise qualifying PSLF payments you make during the summer will count iIf you are a teacher who does not teach during the summer months, otherwise qualifying PSLF payments you make during the summer will count ifif:

«If Jesus was just a soft moral teacher who taught us to love one another and petted little babies, the Romans wouldn't have crucified him,» Litfin says.

Good article but there was a slight mistake I think... «If Jesus was just a soft moral teacher who taught us to love one another and petted little babies, the Romans wouldn't have crucified him....

Pastor and writer Rob Bell stated that he once «heard a teacher say that if people were taught more about who they are, they wouldn't have to be told what to do.

But a boy should have a mom and a dad and a girl should have a mom and dad, and if that can't be then an uncle or an aunt or coach or teacher... God is god and he won't bake cake with you or teach you how to fix things (though it could be your dad baking cake or your mom fixing things; that's not the point, though 9 times out of 10 it will be the other way around.)

What Jefferson couldn't foresee, but which Spalding knows well, is that such mandates can only work if the teachers charged with teaching the principles reject reigning dogmas which reject the very possibility of truth.

Each sermon was generally taught by a different teacher if enough were available.

If, as a progressive Protestant, I am fully committed to the truth, whether or not it is supportive of my Christian biases, should I in fact continue to follow a Jewish teacher of the early part of the first century whose teaching obviously reflected a very different socio - cultural situation than mine?

We must recognize that if someone comes into our group who teaches differently than we do, one of us is a false teacher — and it might not be the other guy.

My favorite part of the post is «that if someone comes into our group who teaches differently than we do, one of us is a false teacher — and it might not be the other guy».

Teachers, preachers, and others who devote themselves to the work of instruction can be saved needless frustration and disappointment if they bear in mind the weight of educational influences exerted by the culture as a whole, and if they take account of the prevailing cultural patterns as they plan their teaching.

Now if we assume that it is as we have supposed (and without this assumption we return to the Socratic order of things), that the Teacher himself contributes the condition to the learner, it will follow that the object of Faith is not the teaching but the Teacher.

If this teacher is fired, I will invite him or her to Boston University, where I now teach, to explain what he or she was trying to accomplish in challenging students with this assignment.

Similarly, if teachers employed by the public are assigned to teach on parochial school premises, they tend to come under the administrative aegis of the parochial rather than the public school (not that they teach religion, but that they otherwise function to some degree as adjunct faculty, increasing with tax funds the staffing resources of the parochial school — a consideration apparently underlying two 1985 decisions but not well articulated by the Supreme Court)

Jeremy, if you have chosen to be a spiritual teacher or religious leader you must bring fresh teachings to the generation in which you serve.

But even today I believe these lay teachers might go at their task differently if they knew that the product of their efforts was to be appraised, in some proper way, and that this appraisal too was part of the teaching and learning process.

I'll be happy to have our school teachers teach evolution to our kids if they can explain to them in a scientifically valid way how the evolution process works.

If such classes do teach that, then the teachers should be shot.

But if you take Jesus seriously as a teacher, you can not simply take his instructions on how human beings should relate to one another, but also his teachings about his role and his destiny.

If one is open to relationships, then teaching itself can be a growth experience for the teacher.

An ongoing program of teacher - training is essential if teaching is to be a satisfying experience and if religious education is to move decisively toward the goals described earlier.

I remember one of my teachers, Dr Don Burt, who said that as we teach about spiritual principles and spiritual healing that if issues in our own lives don't come up we aren't teaching effectively.

For example, if he was a teacher who expounded enduring moral and spiritual laws, then to improve our relation to him would be to believe what he taught and to obey the laws he showed us.

Not because I don't think Christianity is true and the kids, like all sinners, need to know the truth, but because teachers who don't know all the basics about the Bible would mess it up or if they were an atheist being forced to teach it would probably spread their bias and teach things wrongly on purpose.

If a teacher is using artificial forms of contraception, how is that going to affect his or her capacity to teach the Church's teaching on contraception?

If the teacher is «co-habiting» with another human being, male or female, same sex or other sex, without benefit of matrimony, how does that affect that person's capacity to teach with integrity on the Church's requirement of chastity and abstinence before marriage?

I think, though, that the section on abortion would be greatly strengthened if teachers (and therefore students) were further reminded of the seriousness of the crime of abortion in Catholic teaching and their obligation to resist it.

Of course, if you are referring to a formal teacher, that is standing up as a teacher / leader I can see the issues, but i expect most readers / listeners are not in that category and would want to be encouraged to «teach Scripture» rather than told to «correct yourself».

The Church believes it's the teacher nothing more and if it had not been for the Church's authority against dangerous heresies like Albigensianism which taught people that all the physical world is evil and caused people to starve themselves.

If the teacher prefers to teach myth as myth, without demythologizing, he can apply the principle of interpretation which Crombie suggests as a basis for discussion.

English is my university discipline, and I was an English teacher for years, but I have to agree with the statement by one teacher: «If we had to teach them to speak, they'd never learn.»

But a heartening sign in the present situation is the increase of interest among these librarians in their work as teachers and the increase of concern among faculties for the development of school libraries as teaching centers)-- to enter into conversation with a continuous if not identical group of thinkers.

Your teacher shouldn't be teaching if they don't believe the science.

It is said that you can not teach anyone what they do not know already; and Jesus, being a good teacher, has reached back into the tradition that he shares with the young man and pointed out what both of them know: If you would be like a tree planted by rivers of water, learn to know, love, and obey the Law of God.

If teachers of status, whether priests or layfolk, do not accept themselves and do not teach to others the doctrine of life and human goodness that Jesus taught on earth and still teaches in His Church, they will not form within others the true identity of the real, the living Jesus.

if all [teaching] personnel could simply recognize and accept the fact that they are fallible persons... our educational system would be revolutionized overnight... Gone would be the steady, unchanging infallible mask which is the most prized possession of every teacher....

He is a very gifted Bible teacher, but when I saw his diary and monthly schedule, it seemed to be an enormous corporate venture and I could not help wondering if he found any time to apply his teaching gifting.

If we lay aside our opinions, biases, views, mindsets... etc and honestly and objectively look at what the Bible says and teaches then we can only conclude that women are not to be pastors, preachers, or teachers over men.

Additionally, I do agree that if believer's at a given church are not effectively being taught the Word of God, and they believe they need a more effective teacher to better learn the Bible, it is their right to seek one.

Jesus teaches in Matthew 10:40 - 42 that if we receive prophets and teachers and even do something small like give cups of cold water, then we will receive reward and praise from Jesus because it was as if we were doing these things to Him.

V. 38 Paul states that if one doesn't acknowledge his teaching as authoritative, then that person should be considered as one having no authority to speak on spiritual things (he has in mind false teachers or church rebels who would oppose his teaching).