Sentences with phrase «if the risks pay»

If the risks pay off, it gets the profit; but if it makes a loss, it goes bankrupt and the loss is passed to its creditors.
If the risk pays off, you grow in confidence and have succeeded in what you were trying to do.
If those risks pay off, rewards are as big.

Not exact matches

So many professionals are scared of the risk and time commitment that comes with a social media strategy, but Twitter can pay off in big ways if you use it correctly.
Even with only a prospective order in hand from a client whose propensity to pay up is uncertain, a business can turn to a factor to see if it will assume or share the risk.
That's enough to carry Barrick's debt load, but the company's ability to make new investments and pay dividends to shareholders could be at risk — especially if gold prices stay low or fall further.
Neuroscientist Dr. Tara Swart has shown that our current risk aversion or risk tolerance is linked to how we've benefited from risks in the past; if you take a risk and it pays off well, we physiologically respond by favoring risks in the future.
While investors will have to find stocks with higher yields, pay more for them and take on more risk in bonds, the biggest change in a permanently low - rate world is that people will need to set aside more of every paycheque if they want to keep the same goal for retirement income.
If we don't pay attention to what's really going on in our heads, we risk misjudging our peers — by giving them too much credit, or too little — for all the wrong reasons.
Companies may even have to pay fines if they don't warn customers about the risks of chemicals in coffee.
«For people who have the risk tolerance, investing that money rather than paying off the mortgage is fine, but think about what would happen if the investments don't pan out and you still have to pay your mortgage,» says Craig Brimhall, vice president of Wealth Strategies at Ameriprise Financial.
If you need life insurance, the longer you delay, the more you'll pay — essentially, because your risk of dying increases with age.
If a catastrophic event were to occur and it had to pay out a lot at once, or if the economy didn't recover for many years, then those reserves would be at risIf a catastrophic event were to occur and it had to pay out a lot at once, or if the economy didn't recover for many years, then those reserves would be at risif the economy didn't recover for many years, then those reserves would be at risk.
If you pay invoices with personal checks or credit cards, you run the risk of overcomplicating your finances or not passing an audit.
Beyond those basics, you'll get approved more readily and with better terms if you give the banks precisely what they need to make a decision: tax returns and audited (if possible) financial statements (P&L, balance sheets and cash flow) for the year to date and the previous three years; monthly statements for the previous 12 months; a business plan explaining what you do, how you do it and why your company would be a good risk; a detailed projection showing how you will generate the funds to pay down the line; and a backup plan (collateral) to repay the bank if the projections don't pan out.
«That allows them to pay out the dividends without running the risk that they'll have to cut their payouts if they have to expand their capital expenditures,» he says.
If there is a free lunch in investing, this is it, though the market doesn't pay for avoiding avoidable risk.
Debt: Taking on debt raises risk: Interest charges increase your company's break - even level, there's the possibility of foreclosure if the lender can't be paid, and principal and interest payments soak up cash flow that could be used in stressful times.
I called Samsung, and they told me it could take as long as three weeks to get a repair under warranty, with a risk of having to pay if they decided the damage was my fault.
It might be a worthwhile risk if you're flying solo, but if you'd like to be seated near your travel companions, you'll have to pay.
But if everyone is earning vast sums and taking great risks as a result, it doesn't mean that pay is on target.
«If you are just buying income and not paying attention to the valuations, you are probably taking on more risk than you bargained for,» says Brad Kinkelaar, head of the dividend team at Pimco.
Here's an easy way to correct that situation: Encourage your employees to take smart risks — even if those risks might not pay off.
I'm probably taking on more risk than you did, but I've got some savings and can probably pick up enough consulting work to pay the bills even if I don't find the right full - time job right away.
The House Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs defined this risk as «the difference between the rate that the guaranteed loans carry and the rate that Chrysler would be required to pay if the loans were obtained without the federal guarantees.»
The logic being that the current investors and founders have more inside knowledge of the company performance and dynamics than a brand new investor and thus if the new investor is going to «pay up» they shouldn't take all of the pricing risk in the deal.
It may be a good idea to pay the higher price for the bundle if you are having trouble finding a company to insure your high - risk home.
If you are paying each year the equivalent to more than an annual S&P 500 return or what you can earn risk - free investing in government Treasuries, how are you ever going to get ahead?
If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors, the vote to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the vote to approve the amendment and restatement of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, and the stockholder proposals requesting: (i) the elimination of supermajority voting requirements, (ii) the adoption of a policy to consider employee pay ranges when setting CEO compensation, and (iii) a report on Salesforce's criteria for investing in, operating in and withdrawing from high - risk regions (Proposals 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in this Proxy StatementIf you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors, the vote to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the vote to approve the amendment and restatement of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, and the stockholder proposals requesting: (i) the elimination of supermajority voting requirements, (ii) the adoption of a policy to consider employee pay ranges when setting CEO compensation, and (iii) a report on Salesforce's criteria for investing in, operating in and withdrawing from high - risk regions (Proposals 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in this Proxy Statementif you want it to count in the election of directors, the vote to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the vote to approve the amendment and restatement of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, and the stockholder proposals requesting: (i) the elimination of supermajority voting requirements, (ii) the adoption of a policy to consider employee pay ranges when setting CEO compensation, and (iii) a report on Salesforce's criteria for investing in, operating in and withdrawing from high - risk regions (Proposals 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in this Proxy Statement).
This is because there is a higher risk that you won't pay back the loan if you borrow a lot or if you plan to repay the loan over a long period of time.
If pre-product, pre-revenue companies (i.e. loss making, just idea stage) can be valued for $ 10 — $ 20 million, why can't Financial Samurai, which is highly profitable, has six years of existence, can pay a nice dividend if it wants to, has way less risk than all these new startups, and can grow revenue by triple digits every year with promotion, be worth a similar rangIf pre-product, pre-revenue companies (i.e. loss making, just idea stage) can be valued for $ 10 — $ 20 million, why can't Financial Samurai, which is highly profitable, has six years of existence, can pay a nice dividend if it wants to, has way less risk than all these new startups, and can grow revenue by triple digits every year with promotion, be worth a similar rangif it wants to, has way less risk than all these new startups, and can grow revenue by triple digits every year with promotion, be worth a similar range?
If we use sprinkling dividends as a loopwhole in order to make Bob's total compensation the same as salaried employee Susan, we have passed the risk premium over to be paid by Susan by way of tax revenue foregone by exempting Bob.
A dynamic is put in place in which debt keeps labor down — not only by eating up its wages in debt service, but in making workers suffer sharp increases in the interest rates they have to pay or even risk losing their homes if they miss a payment by going on strike or being fired.
So it's still legal to buy, sell, and exchange these kinds of weapons, including in Nevada, as long as they're a few decades old — although with some extra hurdles that don't apply to other types of firearms, such as registering fully automatic guns with the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and paying a special tax, with the risk of additional penalties if someone doesn't comply.
After all... How much risk is there if you could take a company private for way less than the amount of cash it has in the bank, cease operations and pay out the cash as a dividend?
You take a big risk with variable interest rates, because if rates rise, your loan rate — and your payments and the total interest you pay — can increase substantially.
When you pay zero down, it's considered a bigger risk than if you put down 10 percent.
The cosigner takes on some of the risk and agrees to pay back the loan if the borrower can't.
Well, the banks now, if they're buying a bond of Greece or somewhere else, all of a sudden they have to pay huge risk insurance premiums in order to protect themselves against the fact that Greece may simply say, «Look.
When you buy, you do so with the expectation of getting paid back, with interest, in a certain amount of time — criteria that render bonds a low - risk, if boring investment.
Although this clause is not automatically included in most modern life insurance policies, you may have to pay a higher premium if you fall into certain high - risk categories.
If the buyer pays in bitcoin, Canter said the sellers plan on taking steps to manage the potential risk.
Duration Risk: If interest rates do ever decide to rise, duration will be the most important statistic for bond investors to pay attention to.
You also have to ask yourself if you're prepared to run the risk that a crash in real estate prices could leave you with a depreciated house that you own outright and can't sell for anything close to the price you paid.
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
The primary difference being that Wage Laborers PUT UP THEIR OWN SELVES (e.g., their «labor») as the thing being risked, while so - called «capitalists» have nothing of their own at risk if they play with OPM (other people's money) AND ALMOST NEVER EVER PAY FOR THEIR FAILURES, in any case.
Recourse factoring means you take on the risk of having to reimburse the freight factoring company if the shipper or broker delays or refuses to pay.
Parents can decide for themselves if the lower variable rate now is worth the risk of paying more later.
Non-recourse factoring means we take on the credit risk if the bill is not paid.
If this is something you worry about, I suppose you could mitigate the risk by draining your dividends out of the paying corporation and then reinvest them elsewhere.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z