Sentences with phrase «if these questions speak»

If these questions speak to you, and you are considering couples therapy, please consider scheduling a consultation with our center.

Not exact matches

Many insiders — Fortune spoke with 19 current and former McDonald's executives, as well as more than two dozen industry analysts and veterans — are starting to question if Thompson is up to the task and how long his tenure will last.

If possible, speak for 15 to 20 minutes, then take questions from the floor.

Speaking of honesty, if anyone questions your decision, be transparent with them.

What if they could answer questions about what accounts to focus on next and what content to put in front of the prospect to speak to his pain points without hours of painful research?

If you require additional information or have any questions about Sales Focus Inc., I would welcome the opportunity to speak with you personally.

Refer this question to your business mentor if you have one, or alternatively try to speak to someone with practical industry experience.

Ahead of Mr. Zuckerberg's trip to Washington, Facebook has hired a team from the law firm WilmerHale as well as outside consultants to coach him on questions lawmakers may ask, and on how to pace his answers and react if interrupted, according to people close to the preparations, who would speak only anonymously because the sessions were private.

In planning the progression of the iterative form fields, consider the logical progression of questions you might ask the lead if speaking to them in person for a sales call.

If you have specific questions about the program, you can speak to a HUD - approved mortgage lender or send an email to [email protected].

If you are speaking the entire time, the prospect may have questions that we was not able to address but may be critical to whether you won the assignment or not.

However, if one were going to attempt to answer the question «Why do some people hate Jews,» a probable answer might have something to do with the fact that one is not permitted to speak of Jews in any way whatsoever without being branded an anti-Semite and shouted down.

And then I knew that if I simply read the Bible, there was a real possibility that I would be pushed by God to speak and ask questions more openly.

Good question... If the person speaking from the pulpit is commited to pursuing holiness, then I believe that they are speaking for God.

oops again, then if it said G - d spoke then G - d spoke inerrent through the writer which we may believe in the same way we believe the more sure word of prophecy, the gospel itself, foolishness to those perishing and so on,... does it give me words to live by, then the answer to your question and my application in my own life the answer would have to be Yes.

Whoever talks in this questioning vein (and even if he say it amid groans, the utterance is the same), should be on his guard, for he scarcely knows by what spirit he is speaking.

If in this connection we would only refer to the testimony of the Spirit who speaks in and through Scripture, this would indeed be correct and would be acknowledged also in Catholic theology; but we would not yet have reached the question where the dialogue touches the human dimension as such.

If any christian can answer this question without any double speak then I will believe.

Matthew 12:36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.Romans 14:12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.The next question was What happens if he / she is in an accident?

Which begs the question... What does it matter if I am an expert in Bible trivia, can speak to angels in my prayers, and can quote a thousand Bible verses, but have not love?

It is as if there is almost three tiers of religion M. Scott Peck speaks about this in some of his writings, the bottom tier are those who blindly accept, the middle level is composed of those who came to reject the things they accepted blindly, and the final tier of enlightenment is those who have gone through all the hard questions, accepting nothing blindly, yet eventually find God.

I believe that if we have eyes to see and ears to hear, the Gospel answers the questions and fulfills the longings that are spoken, sang, painted, and heard in all the various artistic and creative pursuits of all humanity.

If the church is utterly unknowable, unobservable, so detached from history that one can not speak of it properly, then very practical questions ensue: To whom do we pay our tithes (or church taxes in the state churches of Europe)?

But we should now ask if there is a way in which we can speak intelligibly of «resurrection» without having such questions to plague us.

But how could they speak a useful word to South American Christians if they had not seriously addressed the theological questions of common belief and mission?

If you're going to speak absurdities in this world then those absurdities deserved questioned and scrutinized.

In the world of reality, on the other hand, where it is a question of the individual man, there is this little tiny transition from having understood to doing; it is not always cito citissime [as quickly as possible], not geschwind wie der Wind [fast as the wind], if I may speak German for lack of philosophic terms.

The gospel may again speak to us, and make of us ambassadors for Christ, if we appear before that One with empty hands, with the questions of those whom we represent (which are also our questions) and wait for answers... or rather, for the Answerer.

If the Word of God must necessarily speak with the mythopoetic words of men, it is all the more inevitable that this should be so where the ultimate issues of existence are in question.

No, if I have spoken poorly and just in so far as I have spoken poorly, then without any excuse whatsoever I, as an individual, will be questioned about that.

I wonder if maybe there was a prominent radio or television pastor who spoke about it recently, and so that is why I all of a sudden got so many questions about soul sleep, or maybe it was just pure coincidence.

How as a Christian can you question another Christian who plans to have an abortion if they believe their God has spoken to them and already deemed that their unborn child will be a sinner and that they should have the abortion and let Him take over?

If you are the authority, then speak with authority, and have folks discuss and question during coffee hour.

The affirmation in Mark 14:61 in answer to Pilate's question is less likely to have been spoken by Jesus than the replies given in Matthew 27:11 and Luke 22:70, for if he had said that he was the Son of God, the Jews could have put him to death for blasphemy.

If it should so happen that in this talk I have spoken the truth, then I shall be questioned no further about this matter.

We can only say that he is a man if he thinks and speaks and freely questions the whole of the world and his existence, even if he can not answer this one total question.

(If there can be any question or an analogy, the circumstance of the death of Pythagoras furnishes it, for the silence which he had always maintained he had to carry through in his last moment, and therefore [being compelled to speak] he said, «It is better to be put to death than to speak» [cf. Diogenes Laertius, viii.

He must have lived so that he has hours and times in which he collects his mind, so that his life can win the transparency that is a condition for being able to put the question to himself and for being able to answer it — if, of course, it is legitimate to demand that a man shall know whereof he speaks.

Sometimes it almost sounds as if «creativity» is intended as an answer to that question, (For example, he speaks of «the creativity whereby there is a becoming of entities superseding the one in question» [PR 129]-RRB- but it can be so even less than Aristotle's prime matter.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

If Mr. Grahmam was consistent in speaking the truth he would also comment on Newt Gingrich so called redemeption and question his conversion.

Honest question # 2 — If many Christians will applaud a fellow Christian who stands up against or speaks out against what they view as the harmful actions and / or bad policies of their government or the company they work for...... why will they not also applaud their former fellow Christian who leaves Christianity and speaks out against what they view as the harmful actions and / or bad policies of the God they once worshiped?

I am suggesting that we must think differently about what the saving love of God means if it is to speak to our time, addressing the question of the possible end of existence raised by, ecological deterioration and nuclear escalation and that we do this by thinking in different images.

They might take the preacher more seriously if he would be honest about what he has to offer, namely, that sometimes he has little to offer, and can only stand humbly before the human question with the hope that God will be able to speak and act out of his honest weakness.

These questions present no special difficulty if one's philosophical stance is external to the human knowers one is considering as subjects; if, in other words, one speaks of knowers only in the third person.

If it is, this question follows: Out of what tradition do process theologians speak?»

But here's the big question: if Nye bugs you, then are you going to skip going to EPCOT center to hear him teach about the universe Big Banging (out of nowhere for no reason) along with another controversial JC Penney's spokes - person?

These are very topical questions, if you follow, for example, the thesis of the German writer Sloterdijk, who also speaks of the «human zoo» and of a «new humanity» seen in the light of genetics.

If so, it is not because the Church has a superior plan for reconstruction; or because its clergy speak with authority upon political or economic questions; or because its members are exceptionally virtuous or intelligent.

Deborah — prophet, judge, national leader (Judges 4 - 5)[McKnight says, «if we ask what did women do, and we ask this question of Deborah, we learn that women could speak for God as a prophet, render decisions n a law court as a judge, exercise leadership over the entire spiritual - social Israel, and be a military commander who brought Israel to victory.»