If wealthy people are included among those who can benefit from a choice program, they can organize to protect and expand that program.
«
If wealthy people have one thing in common, it's that they're brand - affiliated,» says Flohr, who resides in a massive James Bond - inspired home in his native Switzerland.
The book seeks to answer the question:
If wealthy people have the same 24 hours in a day, and work just as hard as others, how do they acquire such incredible wealth?
These moochers believe that this wealthy person would serve Christ better
if the wealthy person gave more money to charities.
They argue even more against wealth taxes, as it means income can be negative
if a wealthy person decides to not do any work that year (under a regular income tax, 0 income would be subject to 0 tax).
One reason would be
if the wealthy person was only purchasing the permanent death benefit for the heirs.
If a wealthy person can use money that is already making money to make more money... (you may need to read that again)... will they do it?
One reason would be
if the wealthy person was only purchasing the permanent death benefit for the heirs.
Not exact matches
National Press Club president Thomas Burr asked Thiel
if what happened to Gawker could happen to other news publications: «Could
wealthy, powerful
people seek revenge against a news organization because of something they didn't like and use their influence and money to take them out?»
If we're using technology to get as many hits as possible and to create gadgets for millions of
people so we become
wealthy, that's not a good measurement.
The bull market should be making a lot of
people wealthier if they've been continuously investing all this time!
However,
if you're not independently
wealthy and you have
people who depend on you and your income, you probably need life insurance.
if you beliieve in god, you brand yourself as a believer, know that some
wealthy (or Chinese)
person is chuckling all the way to the bank (or library).
Vote for Romney
if your a very
wealthy person, other wise your screwed.
If you want to do well by your kids find out what
wealthy, educated
people (not entertainers) are naming their kids and use those names, at least for the first names.
If this is the case with the widow, what did Jesus think about the
wealthy people giving to the temple?
If you are a conservative Christian who believes the Bible is the word of god and you also are pro-gun, pro-tax cuts for the
wealthy, pro-death penalty, pro-war, pro-torture, anti-poor
people (aka the «moocher class»), anti-immigrant, anti-marriage (straight or otherwise), pro-judging others....
If we cut the taxes on the
wealthy, there is no guarantee they will hire more
people, and lower prices, and so on.
But given that most of us Americans are the
wealthiest people on the planet, and given that we're surrounded by
people who are starving to death, we need to seriously question whether we're really listening to and obeying God
if we're keeping 97 % of our wealth for ourselves.
If you were to check the business background of the
wealthiest people (i.e. Joe Kennedy) you would find out that they are some of the biggest CROOKS in the World.
I am not calling for cuts to government programs as of now — they are necessary for so many
people's basic survival — but Mr. Beck does have a pertinent point: voting to tax someone else (typically
wealthier than us) to provide assistance does not necessarily demonstrate a society that «cares» — much more caring is a society that willingly donates those funds to charities they have taken the time to research, and more caring still
if the members of that society take the time to volunteer to administer that aid.
Andrew, I am guessing that you are talking about the Christian God and your evidence to support it is that there are many
wealthy Jewish and Christian
people in the U.S., but you can correct me
if I am mistaken.
If you don't like what the
people at your present church think about gays or you're being
wealthy, then it's a rather simple matter to find a different church that matches your att.itude.
Even
if a few of the
wealthier people in the US were to donate some of their funds, we might be more successful at providing universal healthcare than the government.
If I am a
wealthy person and I give away half my worth as a sacrifice to my spiritual betterment, but am still a
wealthy person without that money... is it a sacrifice, or merely something to appease my conscience?
correct me
if i'm wrong but i believe the wholegrain option used to be cheaper than the polished, white bread; simply because white bread signified refinery and extra manufacturing processes, and so the
wealthy usually go for the refined white bread and the poorer
people go for the unrefined wholegrain bread.
If you are used to thinking that formula is something
wealthy people use, you have experienced marketing that formula is good for your child, or you have come from an emergency situation where formula is fetching inflated prices (one tin can be $ 200 + in parts of Syria), then you take formula when it is freely offered to you.
I'm not sure
if you were aware of this but Saudi Arabia is home to some of the
wealthiest people in the world.
Obviously,
if you have a starting situation where everyone is equally
wealthy, and one
person consumes some of that wealth, a wealth difference appears.
(
If someone has both very lucky birth and extreme merit, they don't need an inheritance to be
wealthy themselves based on merit, so the net benefit to the economy from inheritances received by that
person are modest.)
This goes back to the sort of
people who'd choose to immigrate to a new land, expressed in the Declaration of Independence's «We hold... that all men are created equal...» In general, every American regarded himself as equal to anyone else:
if he was not
wealthy at the moment, he believed that could be changed through his own efforts.
One reason that we don't tax gifts and inheritances at a 100 % rate is because the ability to pass on wealth to the next generation gives the
people who are currently earning that wealth an incentive to create more wealth and because these very
wealthy people would be less economically productive
if they couldn't do so.
Thus it is a
wealthy person's duty to give away as much of their wealth as possible in productive ways before they die, and
if they fail to do that for some reason, it is both right and moral for the government to step in and do it.
«You can bet
if this was a town that was in Westchester near New York City — a town with a lot of
wealthy people donating to politicians» campaigns — this would have been addressed a lot sooner,» Nixon said at a meeting with Hoosick Falls residents.
If you raise taxes on a super
wealthy person in New York, they can move to Connecticut with virtually no problem (it did happen after NY passed major tax increase on hedge funds).
The
IFS have confirmed that, as a result of our changes, the
wealthiest 10 % of
people are making the greatest contribution.
«We are a
wealthy society in Britain and
if we're going to live within the limits of our planet then some
people are going to have to get more and some
people at the top are going to have to get less and that means that the economics and the environment go together.
If a
person is «too»
wealthy, then they rely less on the government and are free to change countries when it suits them.
And
if our own congressmen won't defend New York and instead bow down to the hard right wing paymasters who just want tax breaks for the
wealthiest people and the
wealthiest corporations.
What
if a registered Independence
wealthy person says he or she wishes to run for governor?
Cuomo has said that
wealthy people and businesses will move to other states
if taxes go up, and has pushed through cuts to the estate tax and corporate tax since taking office in 2011.
«
If you look historically the
wealthiest person doesn't always win the race,» Kolb said.
Asked
if his recent fund - raising sprint of $ 1,000 - per - head dinners was at odds with his proposal to increase taxes for the
wealthy, de Blasio said, «a number of
people who are supporting my campaign will be among those taxed and so they are, by definition, buying into that plan.»
Jeffrey Gural, chairman of Newmark Grubb Knight Frank explained his support for Obama this way: «Typically, most
wealthy people support the Republicans,
if for no other reason than they've pledged not to raise their taxes — which I think is just not fair.»
A party spokesman told the Guardian newspaper: «
If you're faced with a choice in terms of helping the
wealthiest pensioners or helping the vulnerable across Britain, then his priority is the vulnerable
people across the country who need the most help.»
It shouldn't just be for independently
wealthy people or career political operatives, and those are the
people that I think you'll wind up with
if you pass something like that.»
«Even
if people think objectively and follow rules of statistical inference, richer and poorer
people may be led, by the information available to them, to very different conclusions about how
wealthy their fellow citizens are, on average, and how wealth is distributed across society.»
«
If you're rich, there's a good chance you know lots of other rich people and relatively few poor people; likewise, if you're poor, you're likely to know fewer wealthy people and more poorer ones,» says study co-author Robbie Sutto
If you're rich, there's a good chance you know lots of other rich
people and relatively few poor
people; likewise,
if you're poor, you're likely to know fewer wealthy people and more poorer ones,» says study co-author Robbie Sutto
if you're poor, you're likely to know fewer
wealthy people and more poorer ones,» says study co-author Robbie Sutton.
Richer
people are likelier to be happier, but only
if they're
wealthier than their neighbors.
According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research,
wealthier people are more likely to donate to charity
if they endorse social inequality while less
wealthy people are more likely to make donations
if they endorse greater equality.