Sentences with phrase «if writers»

If all writers mine their own history, there's definitely a chunk of mine in here but not actual people.

I do see a lot of writers write about writing, which is great if writers are your audience (wow, that was a lot of alliteration), so if you're an editor, book manager, publisher, or someone who is in the business of helping authors (i.e., I write about social media, book marketing, and branding, so my articles are geared toward authors / bloggers).

I believed that if writers were simply given a chance, that the entire world would be surprised by the amazing talent and knowledge locked between the minds and fingertips of ordinary writers around the globe.

Bibliographies are only necessary if writers use some information from other sources and acknowledgements are needed if there are people who help create or publish the e-books.

If writers are writing and readers are reading, who are we to judge that they should «improve.»

Without this, even if our writers are qualified and experienced; they can not deliver high quality paper without proper requirements given to them.

If writers do not know who their audiences are, they can, in essence, ride the coattails of the marketing channels of a traditional publisher.

So, students have to research about writing services and essay writers so that they can understand if the writers are impressive enough to write your academic papers.

But, if writers hold back and don't mention their book because of the flood of self - promo everywhere and all - the - time and in - your - face, how else are writers ever going to get it out there?

One thing Konrath says is that the walls the gatekeepers have built up and continue to tout as their strengths will come crumbling down if writers start talking to one another.

If the writers take advantage of Amazon's new «70 % royalty plan», they'll make a much bigger slug of that $ 10 than they do of the $ 15.

What if our writers know even fewer «actual readers» than our publishers?

The site claims that they all have lots of relevant experience in the field in which they write, and that the company, but the surest way to know that you are getting a good quality writer closely monitor them is through the rating system, which allows you to see if writers have received any negative feedback.

Positive feedback gives writers some encouragement to keep writing (the writing world can be brutal at times), and if writers know what they are doing well, they can continue to build on those strengths.

Chapter Five... I get a lot of questions about pen names and if writers should use pen names in this modern world of publishing.

And if writers have other books published under their own small publishing companies, the shove of the Large Publisher will help the writer sell more of their own products.

If writers in general claim to be writing for «because they have to write» and all this other crap, why send manuscripts to writers who have made it?

See, if writers (or anyone else for that matter) could rampantly trademark common words then sue anyone who used the words they «owned» and take their money by force?

There is no reason for utilizing a dissertation writing service if the writers don't cut it right.

and if writers can not get paid — one way or another — using our «open silo», it will not get much traction of consequence as long as writers expect / hope / dream to be paid for e-books.

If these writers are simply satisfied with their current situation... I'm wondering how long that's going to continue being true as advances decrease and bookstores close.

I also skimmed through memoirs and autobiographies in my Kindle library to see if writers and journalists I admire wrote during the holiday season, and what they wrote about.

... If writers have to forgo a $ 5,000 advance to gain a 3500 % increase in royalties, it might well be worth it.

And after all, if writers don't credit each other, who will?

It is unsure if the writers writing their assignment will be providing them quality assignment work or not.

It almost makes it seem that if writers can make a big platform, they can go with a small press, but if one wants to sell fiction (like most of us), it's still better to go with the big publishers.

Since the time for assignment completion is less, student's have uncertainty if the writers will be able to achieve the assignment on time or not.

So now, if writers are going to take over the publishing duties and make the big bucks, they are going to need to understand how to get the books into the distribution system in a more efficient manner beyond just listing them in three places and hoping.

Naturally, if writers followed that advice every time...

They would submit books if the writers wanted them to do so, often keeping a book in the mail to fifty or sixty editors or until the author called enough.

Writing a book is one thing, but if the writers in your life plan on selling their books on Kindle, they MUST also become book marketing savvy.

Hah, that's real multitasking It'll be interesting to see if writers grab the opportunity to use classic characters.

Reviews are one area of potential «influence» that may be pernicious for authors, especially if writers don't maintain a firm distinction between what readers say they want and what is actually good for a book — or for the project the author set out to accomplish.

If writers treat NaNo as it was intended — that is, as simply a challenge and a way to try something that will require daily discipline — it actually stands to be a very powerful tool towards becoming a better author.

By the time I was in the fourth grade — or thereabouts — I knew I wanted to be a writer when I grew up, and I think I was curious to see if the writers I read about were like me or had been when they were kids.

And if those writers are any help at all, they give you honest critique.

If writers don't value their own work — why should others?

If you writers want to write for a living, write.

If all writers are honest, none of us, whether Indie or establishment, can truly say we are happy with the final version of our work, be it hardback, paperback or ebook.

If writers are interested in you as an agent, they will certainly follow up by email or phone.

Even if writers know HTML, they face many more hurdles.

So if writers can stop seeing marketing as something that's outside of the realm of their imagination of creativity and think of it as something that's intrinsic to the work itself, I think it all goes much more smoothly and doesn't feel like such a departure from the writing activity.

If the writers offered the writing papers in online

There was no real way of knowing if Writers Digest was still on track when it said that a market like Tomorrow Speculative Fiction would take six months to get back to you.

«If writers want to write about it, that's great for them, because plenty of people love reading about it.»

If writers hope to write non-craft books and connect with a broader audience, I would highly encourage stating your genre somewhere on your website.

This works really good if all writers are in the same genre.

But that doesn't appear to be the case, if the writers are to be believed.

It's as if the writers (Ben Zazove, Kevin Cecil, and Andy Riley) were unenthusiastically grasping for an opening before settling on simply relaying their initial brainstorm when tasked to come up with a sequel to 2011's featureless and inoffensive

We'll see if writers Jacob Estes and Akiva Goldsmith and director F. Javier Gutierrez have found some interesting new wrinkles to the classic ghost story when Rings hits theaters this Friday.