If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.
Not exact matches
But
if anyone out there knows of an academic (I purposely do not say money management industry) study demonstrating
consistently better performance — after fees and taxes — of any actively managed stock fund versus, say, an S&P 500 or Total Stock Market index fund, please educate us in the
comments to this post.
If you still
consistently notice issues please feel free to
comment about it and let me know what you're seeing.
This
comment, SMR, was mainly about the method — which
if you look at the graphs which benchmark the method against synthetic proxy * data (which is different from the pseudoproxy data generated in MW) you see that the MW methods
consistently overestimate MWP warmth when they are run against a dataset where the answer is known (this is the whole point of synthetic proxies).
If their
comments are
consistently sarcastic or negative, be wary.