Sentences with phrase «if your question requires»

The Internet is a huge resource, but if your question requires particular expertise, here are the best sites where you get answers from real people online.
If their questions require that they be able to see what I am talking about, we have two options: We can use the «whiteboard,» where they can see what I am doing and talk to me on the phone at the same time.
If your question requires financial or legal advice, we may answer it generally, providing as much information as possible or how to find more information.
If the question requires input from the ophthalmologist, Dr. McCalla will be consulted and the advice relayed to you by our staff.

Not exact matches

Its staff posed the following question: If the U.S. created a tax code that eliminated virtually all personal and corporate tax breaks, and also required that the plan be revenue neutral ---- meaning that receipts in 20 years had to match the numbers forecast today ---- how low could rates go?
If there are a high number of technical questions that require a lot of time to answer, your customer support isn't sufficiently optimized yet.
Ask questions about the style of the person's communication, if they are more of an attention to detail or visionary worker, or other questions that don't require the person providing the reference to throw anyone under the bus, but will still key you in to their style.
But Houston persisted with his questioning, asking if Martin could confirm that a boardwalk project at the Northumberland Fisheries Museum required a Class 2 assessment.
It all started with this simple question: if a company is wholly good and engaged in sincere, ongoing and proactive dialogue with its stakeholders, then to what extent would they require the counsel and services of a public relations firm?
Such conditions require close scrutiny, but a troubling question is how much oversight the company had over Ben Aïssa, who spent much of his career working in SNC - Lavalin's office in Tunisia, and what — if any — steps were taken if his colleagues or superiors had concerns.
If we were to continue upward, it would require something extraordinary from our leader, which brings up the question: what is Osvaldo paid to do?
Meanwhile, other questions required a level of analysis that sent Hotze and Watts off to perform some homework (for example, «Describe your company's pricing and profit margins, if relevant, on a product - by - product basis»).
As part of the immaculate Disney guest experience, cast members are required to come up with an answer to any question — even if they have to research an answer or ask a colleague — to avoid frustrating guest experiences.
If you require additional information or have any questions about Sales Focus Inc., I would welcome the opportunity to speak with you personally.
If the price of the stock in question advances too far, the short seller will receive a margin call and be required to put up more money.
If I were thinking about purchasing GECC's debt, I would first ask myself the following question: In the event that GECC were on the verge of a debt default and a bailout by the parent company would require a sum of money that would put undue hardship on GE, would GE guarantee GECC's debt?
Under English law, which often applies to such policies involving international trade, because insurance contracts are «of the utmost good faith», the policyholder is required to disclose all «material» facts to the insurance company even if no question is asked by the insurance company.
If you require an accommodation for the recruitment process or have questions about our workplace, please contact us.
If you have any questions or require assistance in completing the necessary documents, please contact Representative Counsel at 1.866.860.9364 or [email protected].
If you require an address from someone asking a quick question, chances are good the form will be abandoned.
This act has now become the law of the land and requires that patients on admission to a hospital or other institutions in receipt of federal health care funds be questioned about Advance Directives» which are a Living Will, Health Care Agent, Durable Power of Attorney» so that if unable to express an opinion, the patient's wishes concerning life - sustaining technologies will have been made known.
If you admit the value of the scientific method, if you value the process of questioning assumptions, and requiring evidence to support assertions, rather than the idea of holding assertions because they are plesant, then your beliefs should be tossed ouIf you admit the value of the scientific method, if you value the process of questioning assumptions, and requiring evidence to support assertions, rather than the idea of holding assertions because they are plesant, then your beliefs should be tossed ouif you value the process of questioning assumptions, and requiring evidence to support assertions, rather than the idea of holding assertions because they are plesant, then your beliefs should be tossed out.
I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?
The alternative position is to wrestle, as Christian thinkers, with the question: What kinds of social, economic, and political changes are required in our own society if the United States is to abandon its alliances with local oppressors in Latin America?
If you have been following along, you will note that some questions require a whole post to answer.
Before answering this question, we shall grant that changing life requires change in the forms for meeting life and that we may well expect the form of the church's ministry to change if the truth is to be served and the meanings of life are to be met.
Then, at the end, it will be appropriate to ask a further question, «If that is what it meant then and what it means now to me, what does it teach me or what does it require me to do?»
What we certainly must assume at the outset is that the question of such distinctions requires discussion, and that therefore every type of doctrine implied as formally possible if the distinctions are genuine must be given full and fair hearing.
If we think of «theory» as the forming of generalizations or synoptic judgments and think of «practice» as requiring judgments about particular cases, then inquiry guided by these three types of questions will always require capacities for doing both.
After all, if marriage requires actions or relations unique to male — female unions, then to say that marriage is between a man and a woman is akin to a tautology, and we could perhaps regard the question of how we approach same - sex relationships as an altogether different issue.
will have to be assumed and telescoped; but I will concentrate on what I think are critical questions — critical in the sense that they represent, at least in my opinion, points on which greater clarity is required if the community of Christ's discipleship is to move into the post-Christendom future with something like apostolic confidence.
If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us.
This is the question to which an answer is required if the authentic re-creative character of education is to be attained.
If questions are asked, we are required to answer them.
But now if the individual, yes, if you, my listener, and I must admit to ourselves that we were far from living in this way, far from that purity of heart which truthfully wills but one thing; must admit to ourselves that the questions demanded an answer, and yet in another sense, in order to avoid any deception, did not require an answer, in that they were, if anything, charges against ourselves which in spite of the form of the question changed themselves into an accusation: then should the individual, and you, my listener, and I join together in saying, «Indeed our life is like that of most others»?
Every NHS trust has been issued with guidance, with a list of questions to be asked, and documents to be required, if the residence status of a patient is not immediately clear.
Just as in Bultmann's analysis the questions of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.
Here's a great quote from Brian Greene: «The boldness of asking deep questions may require unforeseen flexibility if we are to accept the answers.»
Its the only academic field where the exsperts are required to say» Well if it doesn't make sense then we should not question it.»
And if God's forgiveness is greater and so requires blood, then my next question is, «Why blood?»
The question was pregnant with all kinds of meaning, as if to say: «Though I have been a Jew and have done everything required of me and have kept the commandments, I am not a full participant, I am not an equal.
Just as in Bultmann's analysis the question of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.32
And then the ultimate question: «Even if Job has passed God's test for fidelity, we must wonder if God has not failed Job's test for what is required for God.»
If the existing equipment will run at the required rates, the question becomes why fix something that isn't broken?
Please contact us with any questions, or if you require supporting documentation.»
question, if I have ground almonds already from the store how much would that convert to if 1 2/3 cups of blanched almonds (whole) is required?
If you have any questions or require further detail, please contact Paul Colling on (03) 9270 9051 or via [email protected].
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Suarez made people like Jordan Henderson look good because of his intensity, it was infectious a bit like sanchez no question he raises the performance levels of the team, but there is no sense in having a diamond if you're only going to coat it in $ hit, we need to make sure the players around him can hold their own and can deliver when required.
That would still require us to get a top number 9, so I ask the question to you RC; if we lost Sanchez and replaced him with Lacazette in the left number 10 role and then got a striker like Mbappe, Cavani, Aubemayeng, Lewandowski, would we be stronger than we are now?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z