Prior to Mukasey's opinion, many federal courts and the Board of
Immigration Appeals held that immigrants denied competent counsel could reopen their cases on constitutional grounds.
Not exact matches
Also at 11 a.m., U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services naturalization ceremony for 30 new citizens is
held at One World Observatory, with U.S. Court of
Appeals Judge Robert Katzmann administering the Oath of Allegiance and NYU Distinguished Scholar in Residence Preet Bharara delivering keynote remarks, One World Trade Center, Manhattan.
Interpreting this statement, the
Immigration Appeal Division in Stewart, Gary O'Neil v. M.C.I. (IAD T99 - 04592)
held that «alert, alive and sensitive» to the interests of the child requires the decision - maker to assess, from the child's perspective, how the child's overall development will be affected when the child's parent is facing removal from Canada and then weigh that against other factors.
He served as the expert witness in
immigration law in the landmark California
Appeals Court case of People v. Bautista (2004) 115 Cal.App.4 th 229, which
held that failure to defend against an aggravated felony can be ineffective assistance of counsel, and he was counsel in several key published decisions on crim / imm in the Ninth Circuit.
Our
immigration lawyer represents
immigration and clients facing deportation / removal before the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in
immigration courts throughout the United States in obtaining their permanent resident cards, citizenship, religious and political asylum applications, removal / deportation hearings, criminal defense, DACA, deferred action enforcement, temporary and permanent visa applications, K 1 fiance visa petitions, work authorization visa,
immigration bonds and
holds, criminal bonds,
appeals, violence against women (VAWA) battered spouse petitions, cancellation of removal, TPS or DED and more.
This guide describes the various federal agencies and components that generally
hold immigration records, explains how to request records and
appeal denials or incomplete responses, and provides tips for certain circumstances, such as representing minors or immigrants in removal proceedings.
A majority of the Court of
Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal on the basis that the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had correctly held that the appellant had not established that he was at «real risk» of committing suicide, and that return to Iraq would therefore not amount to an Art 8 (1) interfe
Appeal dismissed the appellant's
appeal on the basis that the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had correctly held that the appellant had not established that he was at «real risk» of committing suicide, and that return to Iraq would therefore not amount to an Art 8 (1) interfe
appeal on the basis that the Asylum and
Immigration Tribunal had correctly
held that the appellant had not established that he was at «real risk» of committing suicide, and that return to Iraq would therefore not amount to an Art 8 (1) interference.