Sentences with phrase «immortals is not»

Not exact matches

Sadly, he is immoral, not immortal.
You are not an immortal video game hero.
In the event you aren't immortal (spoiler alert: you're not), your coworkers should be aware of your plans.
The soul can not be immortal.
Oh, and don't forget we have immortal souls too, because I don't like the idea of not existing in some form or another for the rest of eternity, what I have on this beutiful earth is just not enough to satisfy the greed for more...
Humans aren't immortal.
Remeber you are not «immortal» thank you parasites!!!!
You'll find out in due time that He not only exists, but will be the One whom you will face after your mortal frame releases your immortal soul.
I honestly don't care what «supposed immortal» you believe to be your god as long as you project love.
Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.
That your delusions of grandeur are just lies, that you aren't immortal and that there isn't some superbeing who thinks you are so amazing that he gave you meaning and immortality and special insight?
But since God is immortal and not subject to natural laws that govern all ephemeral living things according to Christians, Jews and Muslims then your information must be wrong and God is still alive and well.
I'm reminded of a famous quote: «The history of our race, and each inividual's experience, are sown thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and a lie told well is immortal» Mark Twain
Religion is not immortal, but will be infecting people throughout our lifetime.
Basically you are admitting that you are a christian, not in order to be a good person, but because you fear death and want to be immortal.
Typically this process leads to a characterization of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else in the religion.
Id add my own: If a god, any god, Christian,,, doesn't matter created the whole works, why is this Power very regional... with our «immortal souls» at risk — you would think that this God would have had a better press corp, a better travel agency... to the point that he could have gone gobal from the start.
It is not coarse, not fine, not short, not long, not glowing (like fire), not adhesive (like water), without shadow and without darkness, without air and without space, without stickiness, odorless, tasteless, without eye, without ear, without voice, without winds, without energy, without breath, without mouth (without personal or family name, unaging, undying, without fear, immortal, stainless, not uncovered, not covered), without measure, without inside and without outside.
Just think, we have the free will to choose of to be or not to be with God, we could float out there in that vast space of the universe as immortal souls until eternity experiencing a drastic changes in temperature, or not experiencing hot and cold anymore, and just floating in that vast space without being with God.
And even so, since to be damned is not to be annihilated, who shall say what mysterious complement might be given to the body of Christ by that immortal loss?
Atheists at least accept that we are not immortal.
We gave them not bodies that would not eat food, nor were they immortals» (Surah XXI, 7 - 8).
Whatever the future holds for Chesterton's cause, his greatest legacy isn't about being a brilliant intellectual, or an immortal man of letters, or even a possible saint.
Does the Mormon position» that Jesus was begotten by an immortal (but not immaterial) father» contradict the ancient Christian doctrine that Jesus had no natural father?
The notion of an immortal soul was not always even part of Judaism.
I can not at the moment recall one immortal phrase which expresses it with the same completeness as that with which the alternative notion has been rendered by Heraclitus.
If our lives are objectively immortal in God, as they are on Whitehead's view, we really don't have the slightest bit of choice about the matter.
but not thru a tree... the people had access to immortal life then (Adam and Eve that is) but they made a CHOICE to disobey God..
At the very least, we know that Jesus was not immortal, omnipresent, or omniscient (Luke 2:52; Matthew 24:36) as a man, even though Jesus is all these things as God.
Only «gods» could understand such evidence and since «man» is not immortal, then «humanity» are not Gods therefore could never have the capacity to understand any evidence of the existence of a «God.»
It is also timeless — not so different from the «immortal longings» evoked by Shakespeare or the anxious concerns John Calvin discerned in his parishioners.
Hartshorne reasons that if the past is not in some sense eternally and perfectly preserved, that is, if the past is not immortal, then it follows that in the more or less distant future, it will be the same as if we had never chosen one action as opposed to any other; indeed, it would be the same as if we had never existed at all.
For Wood we do not need to posit something ahistorically and cross-culturally universal to all human beings, something «objective» like an invisible and immortal soul (which paideia presupposed in ancient Athens), of which «dispositions» and «character traits» are modifications.
but everyone is in spiritual bodies the only difference is whether you make the first resurrection of the millennium those who made it will be in their immortal spiritual bodies which the second death will not affect them.
He also happened to be the son of Zeus — though this does not render him immortal.
This difficulty would however be mitigated if we could say (as Whitehead himself however nowhere does, as far as I know) that it is not actual entities which are objectively immortal in the constitution of other actual entities, but the characters, or forms of their experience which are reproduced» (op.
Though some texts are distorted to try to prove the idea of an immortal soul, they are in fact just that, distorted to say something that they don't say because they are read with the false lens of this pagan concept.
He can not acknowledge that we are less than immortal gods — and that, therefore, our actions must have limits and our lives must recognize bonds of human community across the generations.
We are mortals, not immortals.
to Earth so that I / he dies a lousy death so that the dingbats can feel guilty about it, even though they weren't there and of course there is nothing scary about death when you are immortal.
If there is nothing after death, if a soul is not immortal, and if death is the end, then nothing really matter.
I can't prove that a soul is immortal.
We have talk - show and radio hosts who «explain» how the opposition is ungodly, immortal, tyrannical, fascist, communist, apathetic, or anarchist with such conviction... and when someone toting their ideology goes out and kidnaps or kills someone, or even «peacefully» further teaches violence or hatred (* cough * Westboro * cough *), they aren't responsible.
Isn't a God immortal by definition?
All things by immortal power Near and far Hiddenly To each other linked are, That thou canst not stir a flower Without troubling of a star.12
For let us assume that the flower concluded its story in another fashion and added, «The story is not over, for when I am dead, I am immortal
And don't give us this «sting of humility» crap if you believe that you are made in the image of a God, the most powerful force in the universe listens to you telepathically, and you are immortal.
While they were created to have intimate fellowship with God, the Bible doesn't say Adam and Eve were created as immortal beings.
But he could not tell them why Aquinas thought the soul is immortal, as Aquinas undoubtedly did, and his paper ran out with a discussion of understanding, not the soul.
If every actual entity is objectively (not subjectively) immortal (and immortal in terms of its concrete objective individuality or totality, and not merely in terms of some of its aspects or feelings), then God as consequent would save every value.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z