Sentences with phrase «impact sub michail»

Playing as backup to Santi would probably be the best way for Costa to settle in, and allow him to play the role of an impact sub.

Depressing as it may sound, the only «impact sub» which the Gunners truly utilised was Yaya Sanogo — look at the FA Cup Final, for example.

Bench for me fishes, impact sub if needed?

I had to make do with the bench more often because of it, making do with impact sub appearances.

Up top I would start the Ox with the Pod and Giroud, with Theo coming on later as an impact sub, although this may not help too much in respect of Theo's long running contract negotiations.

I'd like to see him on rotation as a starter for Dembele and as an impact sub in the attacking 3 to add pace and crossing when teams have parked the bus.

But imagine him coming on as an impact sub with 20 minutes to go?

Bojan, so often deployed as an impact sub, is out with a knee injury.

I could possibly have understood it if (1) he was trying to squeeze Kodjia back in (although even there I wouldn't have agreed and think he could rotate those front 4 into 3 slots and use the other as an impact sub, depending on the opposition, fitness etc.); or (2) didn't have an option at no. 10, but Jack is sitting there and ready and, if only lasts for 60 mins, Calum could have replaced him.

I expect Anthony Martial to start down the left flank against youngster Joe Gomez, whilst Marcus Rashford can be brought on as an impact sub.

Impact sub Michail Antonio scored a quality, low finish goal seconds after coming on which gave West Ham hope but Mane, who had hit the post moments before, completed a 4 - 1 Liverpool win to finish David Moyes misery.

Walcott could be used as an impact sub later in the game as his pace could exploit the tiring United defence.

Up - front, Martial should be leading the line, with Rashford available as an impact sub if we need him.

The Blues, who are currently missing Alex and Ramires due to injury, will nevertheless be expected to field a full - strength side even if Drogba comes on only as an impact sub.

AS Roma on the other hand have been relying on 40 year old Totti who has contributed 5 goals and three assist mostly coming on as impact sub for Roma.

Poldi should have been used as an impact sub.

I see jack as a bench impact sub when everyone else is on point.

I hope Jack is used sparingly as our go to impact sub start of next season, versatile, heaps of energy and could be an absolute weapon later in the season to help keep our other midfielder's fresh.

Personally, I think he'll be used primarily as our impact sub this coming season as one of the three behind the striker.

Walcott still a bit tentative after injury (bit like Rambo after leg break) so would use him as impact sub.

Sanchez a big miss and so is Welbz and he will be out all season so an attacter that can do the business is need and move walcott in the middle for Bournmouth with Giroud impact sub for a few games with Sanchez back soon too and a new winger (Mahrez).

Good try Hull, soo close but Mourinho's impact sub scores the winner a minute within being on the pitch.

Olivier Giroud has turned into a great impact sub this season with important goals versus Sunderland and Manchester United in recent weeks but in previous seasons has proven inconsistent as the starting striker and Arsenal have not been genuine title contenders during this spell.

At best, he is a impact sub for a «plan b» situation.

But Milner is a serious impact sub and all around damn good player.

Giroud to come on as an impact sub.

Should be impact sub.

He is more an impact sub (makes better impact coming off the bench) and he always had half a good season not a fully good season (injury / inconsistency).

He's an impact sub, not a starter.

I would only use him as an impact sub until he starts performing better.

Unlike Arteta, Thomas Rosicky can be s genuine impact sub.

I can tell you that we won't have an impact sub because all our bench players get rotten and there is nothing they can do to throw the so - call automatic starters off and get some game time and start some game.

Despite always turning up for France, the case has unfortunately been very different for the Frenchman at club level, with the player being benched in favour of Alexis Sanchez in the early part of the season and largely taking up the role of an impact sub as the season progressed and his situation does not look likely to improve with the Gunners being linked with the likes of Mbappe and Lacazette.

Podolski will only be used as an impact sub when we need to score I suspect or when we have injuries.

Giroud can be an impact sub and also used if we decide to play 2 up front.

hes an impact sub.

Bring in Giroud when needed as an impact sub to hold up the ball and flick passes to the runners.

Normally you would want Sanchez on the pitch even if he was not fully fit but with his poor form and questions over his frame of mind, would it not be better to leave him on the bench and use him as an impact sub if needed?

I think Benzema could be useful he is more of a better finisher tbh and I agree to a certain point at real Ronald and bale mainly get the goals (not a team effort) Giroud is more a impact sub.

We need a world class striker to lead our line, Giroud is there as an impact sub or the guy that comes on for the last 10 min if needed.

But depending on how the game is going and how well the front line is working, Sanogo could come on as an impact sub, with his long legs, pace and power to give a tiring Man City defence a hard time.

If the starting lineup was my choice, I'd sit Giroud for this one and use him as an impact sub if need be.

I guess League cup games and impact sub?

why not use him as an impact sub 60th minute get him to come on..

I do like the direct and dynamic style of the Ox and he does tend to make things happen but I still see him as more of an impact sub.

Then again so do Theo Walcott and the Ox, and if Walcott had not played the full game against Hull I would have expected him to start against Barcelona, but maybe Wenger is saving him as an impact sub.

And should he keep using him as an impact sub or play him from the start?

Giroud has been a great impact sub, but is he going to offer Arsenal more than Alexis playing up front?

For now, Giroud is best as an impact sub.

When I look at the squad for next year, assuming everyone's fully fit, I can't see Welbeck as anything bar the # 2 striker and impact sub currently.