Sentences with phrase «improvement evaluation study»

The National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study (NTIES), a Congressionally - mandated five - year study, found that whereas many clients served by federally - funded programs cut their drug use in half up to a year after treatment, many eventually relapsed.

Not exact matches

Download the «School Lunch Initiative Evaluation,» a study that demonstrated the effectiveness of a program combining gardening, cooking, improvements in school food, and integrating learning about food and the environment into the academic curriculum.

One key benefit of the study is that it offers new methodologies for improvements in some areas of hazard evaluation and assessment.

With additional technical improvements related to exam set - up and delivery, the approach is ready for evaluation in larger clinical studies, including multi-center trials.»

Evaluation of 66 patients with JDM, recruited from the UK JDM Cohort and Biomarker Study and actively treated with anti-TNF agents, showed significant improvements in muscle and skin involvement, as well as in overall disease activity.

Instead of an impressionistic study of the sort offered by Mirel, the kinds of reports that would be helpful to education professionals, and ultimately to students, include evaluations of designs that track individual student performance year to year; the percentage of students reaching local and state standards; a more widely disseminated study of design implementation so others can benefit from lessons learned; and the establishment of a district - wide roadmap for bringing comprehensive school improvement to fruition.

Our study yielded a number of new findings that point to potential improvements in the design of teacher evaluation systems.

She is currently the deputy project director for two U.S. Department of Education studies: the national evaluation of Race to the Top and School Improvement Grants as well as a study that will assess the feasibility of conducting an impact evaluation of paraprofessional reading tutors.

And policies tethering teacher evaluations to student test scores are based on studies that link high - performing teachers to long - term improvements in the lives of students, particularly the most disadvantaged.

Still others praised the study's design but pushed back against interpretations that teacher evaluations of the sort used in the District of Columbia will lead to widespread improvements in teaching quality.

Just one study indicates that improvements in teachers» evaluation scores may have an effect on student learning.

Teacher Wes Upton gets high marks on his evaluation, but the ninth grade social studies teacher still sees room for improvement.

The Family Engagement Partnership Student Outcome Evaluation, a study conducted by the Johns Hopkins University School of Education, links improvements in the performance of D.C. public elementary school students with Flamboyan's Family Engagement Partnership (FEP).

Thinking about whether school partnerships drive effective school improvement, our evaluation of The Gaining Ground Strategy (2009 - 11), comprising school - to - school partnership working; additional support from School Improvement Partners (SIPs); additional training in Assessment for Learning (AfL); and study support, found that Gaining Ground consistently had a positive effect on pupil attainment and improvement, our evaluation of The Gaining Ground Strategy (2009 - 11), comprising school - to - school partnership working; additional support from School Improvement Partners (SIPs); additional training in Assessment for Learning (AfL); and study support, found that Gaining Ground consistently had a positive effect on pupil attainment and Improvement Partners (SIPs); additional training in Assessment for Learning (AfL); and study support, found that Gaining Ground consistently had a positive effect on pupil attainment and attendance.

Efforts to continuously improve teaching quality will not only affect the greatest number of students, but such efforts also hold promise for redirecting teacher evaluation away from «identify and punish» tactics toward collaborative studies of improvement grounded in evidence of student learning, thus revitalizing schools as effective learning organizations.

Dr. McCann has more than 15 years of experience designing and implementing evaluation studies for federal, state, and local - level contracts with a general focus on examining factors that influence school improvement processes and practices.

Research and evaluation studies demonstrate that school improvement programs employing technology for teaching and learning yield positive results for students and teachers.

Communities for Learning is in the process of pursuing various research activities with the University of Iowa Center for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA) related to the validation of the MPPR rubric and its evaluation process, as well as studying their impact on professional imEvaluation and Assessment (CEA) related to the validation of the MPPR rubric and its evaluation process, as well as studying their impact on professional imevaluation process, as well as studying their impact on professional improvement.

His work has appeared in Multivariate Behavioral Research, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Evaluation Review, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, and other journals.

A new study shows that, despite the increased use of value - added data and other forms of teacher evaluation such as student or teacher surveys, first - hand principal observation of teachers remains the most trusted and used means by which decisions are made about teacher improvement.

Without overstating findings from one study, it seems that when it comes to driving improvement, the most important thing evaluations may provide is high - quality feedback.

Studies using Anipryl ® for the treatment of CDS have shown that after 30 days, 80 % of dogs showed improvement in overall cognitive response compared to pretreatment evaluation and improvements in individual clinical signs also were observed.

The lessons learned from studying this problem can and should be applied towards the improvement of existing climate monitoring systems, so that future model evaluation studies are less sensitive to observational ambiguity.»

«Permitted Use»: (1) Installing, operating, maintaining, removing, replacing and collecting data from meteorological towers, stations and anemometers, conducting avian, archeological and biological assessments, environmental assessments, soil and preconstruction analysis, and other studies and evaluations deemed necessary by Grantee for purposes of evaluating the Wind Resources of the Premises, exercising the rights granted to Grantee hereunder, and developing the Wind Energy Project; (2) Constructing, installing, operating, accessing, maintaining and removing (including, when necessary, replacing)(a) WTGs on WTG Pads on the Premises for the conversion of Wind Resources to electricity, and including replacing WTGs for purposes of repowering for conversion of Wind Resources to electricity on WTG Pads located on the Premises and / or in connection or conjunction with other real property on which the Wind Energy Project is located; and (b) all related Improvements (i) necessary or convenient to Grantee in conjunction with WTGs for the Wind Energy Project (ii) for the use by Grantee in collecting, transmitting or otherwise making electricity from the WTGs on the Wind Energy Project marketable and available for sale; or (iii) for the use by Grantee for access to and from the Improvements or a public right of way to the WTGs for the Wind Energy Project (in each case, whether or not such WTGs are on the Premises), or (3) uses otherwise permitted herein.

(1) Conducting quality assessment and improvement activities, including outcomes evaluation and development of clinical guidelines, provided that the obtaining of generalizable knowledge is not the primary purpose of any studies resulting from such activities; population - based activities relating to improving health or reducing health care costs, protocol development, case management and care coordination, contacting of health care providers and patients with information about treatment alternatives; and related functions that do not include treatment;

• Manufacturing method evaluation • Product improvement studies • Manufacturing method testing • Workflow planning • Collaborate with equipment vendors • Observation solicitation

An ambitious evaluation in 1999 of a statewide home visiting program in Hawaii failed to demonstrate any substantial improvements in either maternal or child development and health outcomes.18 Although these findings contradicted previous smaller studies and evaluations of earlier pilot programs, the comprehensiveness of this evaluation led to further examination of the evidence base for home visiting.

This evaluation has the added methodological rigour of longitudinal data; an improvement on the Sure Start evaluations, which were quasi-experimental, cross-sectional studies.

FOCUS TQRIS — Criteria - Center Based Programs (English) FOCUS TQRIS — Criteria - Center Based Programs (Español) FOCUS TQRIS - Criteria - PED Preschool Programs (PreK, Special Education and Title I) FOCUS TQRIS Presentation - Center Based Programs FOCUS TQRIS — Child Trends» Evaluation Study Overview FOCUS TQRIS — Shared Quality Improvement Framework

The teaching and learning audits were based on an audit tool developed by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) for the Queensland Department of Education and Training (DET).1 The audit tool was a precursor to the National School Improvement Tool and, in 2010 - 2012, consisted of the first eight domains of the final tool.2 The Queensland experience provides a valuable case study of one education system's use of the tool as a basis for external school reviews, school self - evaluations and school improvemenImprovement Tool and, in 2010 - 2012, consisted of the first eight domains of the final tool.2 The Queensland experience provides a valuable case study of one education system's use of the tool as a basis for external school reviews, school self - evaluations and school improvementimprovement planning.

Behavioral health providers, in addition to providing clinical services, administrative duties, and perhaps supervision / teaching, may be asked to design evaluations, analyze findings, and present on or publish the outcomes from program development and process improvement studies.

Only one health economic evaluation of ICBT for severe health anxiety has been conducted, and in that study it was found that the treatment was highly cost - effective in comparison to a basic attention control condition that did not receive active treatment.13 The incremental cost - effectiveness ratio (ICER) was − # 1244, meaning that each case of improvement in ICBT relative to the control condition generated a societal net economic gain of # 1244.