Sentences with phrase «in answer to the simple question»

«In answer to the simple question, should the project be held up?

Not exact matches

It all seems so simple and easy, but pitching a plan someone else has created, can be unnatural, and result in the inability to answer hard - hitting investor questions.

Upside pulls this all together and packages it in a mobile app that is designed to quickly show business travelers what their flexibility is worth by answering a few simple questions.

There was a simple answer to the economic question: Keystone is the fastest and easiest way to bring Alberta's oil to market, which will in turn lower the price of oil by about a dollar per barrel for every American — regardless of where the stuff is ultimately sold.

In economics, as in life, the simplest questions are often the most difficult to answeIn economics, as in life, the simplest questions are often the most difficult to answein life, the simplest questions are often the most difficult to answer.

But the question of why anybody in the secular world would turn to the Amish for business advice in the first place is answered right off the top in Erik Wesner's Success Made Simple: An Inside Look at Why Amish Businesses Thrive (Jossey - Bass).

Plasticity, which charges clients $ 3 to $ 5 per employee per month for use of its platform, begins its workplace data collection with a simple question every user answers when they sign in: «How happy are you today?»

As Hemingway wrote in the Sun Also Rises, there's a very simple answer to the question, «How did you go bankrupt?»

So, again, if the leader of the Liberal Party believes in accountability and responsibility, perhaps he should answer this simple question: how much money does a Liberal senator have to steal before they are not welcome in the Liberal Party?»

In this blog post, I seek to answer that question by showing you a simple, yet quite reliable way to know when to step back on the gas pedal.

When you buy a bond or a bond fund, you need to answer a simple question: What role does fixed income play in your portfolio?

This introduction to the world of investing in stocks will provide answers to those questions and show you just how simple Wall Street really is.

There, you'll see a very simple list of questions that you will have to answer in order to get a loan quote and a follow - up call from someone who represents our office.

The question, even in its simplest form, is quite difficult to answer and the implications of that answer have huge impacts on your business.

Trust me, it's far more work trying to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one answer for all the questions you people flail about trying to answer and be able to rely on simple logic and facts to conclude there is no god.

In response to your question as to what my reasons were I have a very simple answer.

So JFA will not answer simple questions abou his cult's beliefs because I am not an American but he feels free to comment (in error) on Canada.

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

Both are real and baffling questions to which the reincarnation teaching claims to supply a simple answer: New souls are simply old souls in new bodies.

«So, returning to the question as to why I am single, there is no simple, easy answer; but I do believe that, in part, it is because I am a woman and a leader and didn't marry before it became apparent that I was not a behind - the - scenes leader but an up - front, out - loud, follow - me one.»

To Eric.G, to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image»To Eric.G, to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image»to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image».

I asked a simple question and look at the mayhem in your answers, you fellows are going mad trying to answer the question for which you will NEVER know the answer... NONONO you can't answer the question please do not tax your little brains.

The answer to that «how» question is very simple, in outline.

Jesus» exaggerated response to Peter's question about forgiveness in verse 21 shows that he knows we want forgiveness to be a quick and simple answer although it's not.

1) We're highly evolved primates 2) We have overactive imaginations 3) Our greatest evolutionary asset, our large and highly-folded brains, are also responsible for an insatiable curiosity 4) As a species, and a survival tactic, we make things up to comfort ourselves in difficult times 5) As a complex societal species, we create commonalities and «traditions» with others in our clan / tribe / community 6) These «traditions» result in security, trust, and strong relationships that make the collective more able to survive than the individual 7) These common beliefs also act as a means of numbing the brain to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we simple «are not alive» anymore.

Millennial columnist Emily Shire comments in The Daily Beast, «The General Social Survey asks how many partners respondents had sex with, but the generation that grew up with the Lewinsky scandal blasting into our living rooms knows the answer to that question isn't so simple.»

It is questions like these that have provoked the simple answer in much of the university today, not only in the United States but in Europe and Asia as well: Drop the idea of a core education altogether, especially when we know that what we really need to be studying is science, technology, and economics.

The answer to your question of why it is that non-religious people follow and post in a religion blog is, to me, pretty simple.

There are no simple answers to questions of fair play in such complicated matters as this.

People have been asking that question for thousands of years and yet a simple «yes» doesn't really answer it, again, you can go on and keep on believing, I on the other hand have not found sufficient reason for me to believe in judaism.

I admit this is not a question admitting of simple answers, but it is precisely the role of the imagination to grapple with such difficulties and create something new: in that it shares in some way in the Creator's creativity.

It's a simple question we're compelled to answer by the scripture in Matthew.

Each describes a seemingly simple answer to the question of the meaning of life and then negates this answer with statements that typify confusion, mystery, openness, searching: «he does not know real answers,» «you don't know where you're going,» «we find ourselves never getting anywhere,» «what are the real answers,» «knowledge does not contain answers,» «there are no answers in power,» and so forth.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

The big question would be why Wenger didn't persist with the 4 -2-3-1 system, for which the answer is very simple: If you want to accommodate all your stars — Sanchez, Theo Walcott, Mesut Ozil, Jack Wilshere, Aaron Ramsey, Welbeck and Olivier Giroud — in your starting XI, 4 -2-3-1 is not the best possible answer.

I respect freedom of speech, but a very simple question needs to be answered by pro Wenger supporters: Every football manager in the world is judged on results, why does this rule not apply to Wenger?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's great to see not just any F1 team, but a front - running team like Mercedes to put out a simple video answering fan questions on what happened, especially after something as apparently controversial as what happened in Melbourne.

Throughout the 2013 NCAA Tournament, the team at Sports Insights has kept a close eye on Nate Silver's round - by - round predictions in an attempt to answer one simple yet profound question: Does new - age data analysis have a place in the uniquely unpredictable world that is March Madness?

Last week I announced that I and a team of school lunch reform luminaries — Janet Poppendieck, Mrs. Q, Chef Ann Cooper, Ed Bruske, and Dr. Susan Rubin — are going to band together to answer a Lunch Tray reader's simple yet profound question — how does one parent begin to bring about change in school food?

Ask your teen involved questions that move beyond simple answers, such as «yes» or «no,» to in - depth responses.

Yesterday I announced that I and a team of school lunch reform luminaries — Janet Poppendieck, Mrs. Q, Chef Ann Cooper, Ed Bruske, and Dr. Susan Rubin — are going to band together to answer a Lunch Tray reader's simple yet profound question — how does one parent begin to bring about change in school food?

Yes, you should answer their questions, respond to their inquiries and begin to explain the world in simple but straightforward terms.

The Natural Breastfeeding program is a perfect fit for these women because it uses simple, clear, concise videos and easy exercises to answer their questions, all without overburdening them in today's hectic world.

Your toddler's likely asking questions in an attempt to keep a conversation going and loves to answer simple questions as well.

Teachers and students will submit video entries to demonstrate their exemplary efforts in the appreciation of wildlife conservancy and answer simple questions about why preserving wildlife is important.

She's likely asking questions in an attempt to keep a conversation going and loves to answer simple questions as well.

I recently announced that I and a team of school food «superheroes» — Janet Poppendieck, Mrs. Q, Chef Ann Cooper, Ed Bruske, and Dr. Susan Rubin — are banding together to answer a Lunch Tray reader's simple yet profound question — how does one parent begin to bring about change in school food?

Also, try not to mention the child's mother or father, but do answer the child's questions in a simple and straightforward way.

Breastfeeding Answers Made Simple: A Guide for Helping Mothers by Nancy Mohrbacher, IBCLC, FILCA is a comprehensive, research - based counseling guide that provides the answers to virtually every breastfeeding question in an easy - to - use two - column Answers Made Simple: A Guide for Helping Mothers by Nancy Mohrbacher, IBCLC, FILCA is a comprehensive, research - based counseling guide that provides the answers to virtually every breastfeeding question in an easy - to - use two - column answers to virtually every breastfeeding question in an easy - to - use two - column format.