Not exact matches
2.1 by 2030 end hunger and ensure
access by all people,
in particular the poor and people
in vulnerable
situations including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round
Ideally, they would have
access to random control trials of a
particular program
in its own
particular context, but this type of information is impractical
in most
situations.
In most cases, the «closed - ness» does not result in an absolute barrier to access the information, but rather a hurdle — it depends on the situation whether or not that particular hurdle will be the one that makes the legal information completely inaccessibl
In most cases, the «closed - ness» does not result
in an absolute barrier to access the information, but rather a hurdle — it depends on the situation whether or not that particular hurdle will be the one that makes the legal information completely inaccessibl
in an absolute barrier to
access the information, but rather a hurdle — it depends on the
situation whether or not that
particular hurdle will be the one that makes the legal information completely inaccessible.
Just like the job - seeking EU citizen who lost his / her worker status, the Citizenship Directive itself provides for the economically inactive
in his first three months of residence a «gradual system -LSB-...] which seeks to safeguard the right of residence and
access to social assistance», taking into consideration «various factors characterising the individual
situation of each applicant for social assistance and,
in particular, the duration of the exercise of any economic activity» (paras 46 - 48).
Instead, the Court finds that by «establishing a gradual system» as regard the retention of the worker status which seeks to safeguard the right of residence and
access to social assistance, the Citizenship Directive itself already «takes into consideration various factors characterizing the individual
situation of each applicant for social assistance and,
in particular, the duration of the exercise of any economic activity» (para. 60).
Aaron Street: Yeah I mean I think this can be taken too far, so if you had an example like Brad where he only represents criminal defendants and therefore there's no risk of him having a conflict come through the site when he's getting actual information about actual cases, but you could see
in a litigation, let's say a family law lawyer, if their website were trying to collect information to provide tools as both an intake and
access to justice solution that you potentially run into tremendous conflicts of interest problems there and I think obviously any lawyer considering pursuing this for their firm should think through the implications of their
particular situation, but I think what Brad's doing is awesome
in the context of his criminal law practice and I think there are versions of a similar model that could be used
in something like your debt collection defense practice or a small business startup practice or an estate planning practice, but that doesn't mean that it's a model that should be replicated by every lawyer
in every practice.
Before using a
particular technology
in the course of representing a client, an attorney must take appropriate steps to evaluate: 1) the level of security attendant to the use of that technology, including whether reasonable precautions may be taken when using the technology to increase the level of security; 2) the legal ramifications to a third party who intercepts,
accesses or exceeds authorized use of the electronic information; 3) the degree of sensitivity of the information; 4) the possible impact on the client of an inadvertent disclosure of privileged or confidential information or work product; 5) the urgency of the of the
situation; and 6) the client's instructions and circumstances, such as
access by others to the client's devices and communications.
So, if this new proposal applies to lawyers, it should also apply to other professions like doctors
in particular, where lack of
access to adequate care could really be a life or death
situation.
Before using a
particular technology
in the course of representing a client, an attorney must take appropriate steps to evaluate: 1) the level of security attendant to the use of that technology, including whether reasonable precautions may be taken when using the technology to increase the level of security; 2) the legal ramifications to a third party who intercepts,
accesses or exceeds authorized use of the electronic information; 3) the degree of sensitivity of the information; 4) the possible impact on the client of an inadvertent disclosure of privileged or confidential information or work product; 5) the urgency of the
situation; and 6) the client ‟ s instructions and circumstances, such as
access by others to the client ‟ s devices and communications.
Though we proposed to permit covered entities to deny
access in certain
situations relating to the
particular individual requesting
access, we did not specifically exclude any protected health information from the right of
access.