Then hand out this worksheet, which allows students to show if they understand the rules for capitalization by correcting errors
in sentences such as: «my pet dog sam plays with tabby my kitten.»
In sentences such as these, people seem to be taking certain psychological concepts and applying them to a whole corporation.
For some reason they found something funny
in sentences such as:
«Sometimes there is a good case for try and - for example, if you want to avoid repeating the word to
in a sentence such as: «We're really going to try and win this one,»» he adds.
Not exact matches
In just a few
sentences, Minshew creates a bridge to the future, explaining that the new funding will be used to expand to more cities, and build out a new line of services,
such as Coach Connect.
But with lots of ideas,
such a phase doesn't render a simple death
sentence; after being rejuvenated and reappearing
in a slightly rejiggered state, some ideas return to pass with flying colors.
If
such holder participates
in the next Qualified Financing but not to the full extent of its pro rata share, then only a percentage of its Series A Preferred Stock will be converted into Common Stock (under the same terms as
in the preceding
sentence), with
such percentage being equal to the percent of its pro rata contribution that it failed to contribute.]
The holders of
such Series A-4 Warrants shall not be required to make any payment (
in cash or otherwise) to the Company
in connection with the exchange of the Series A-4 Warrants for shares of Series A-4 Preferred Stock contemplated by the preceding
sentence.
It's the final
sentence of this paragraph, though, that explains why so many of us
in the church find ourselves out of sorts with Catholics of the Dionne type, and why the expression «cafeteria Catholic» is
such a just appellation for them.
And
in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may think of themselves less as originalists (
in one recent case
in particular Scalia and Thomas dissented from the majority which held that convicted child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their
sentences based on subtle shifts of language and the over-application of prior case law — no one wants a child molester free and about, but
such results focused outcomes are always dangerous).
If you read the
sentence, the words — who the child
in the mother's womb will be — mean what his / her life will lead him / her into becoming which kind of human, that is, what kind of temperament, attitudes, talents & gifts, and
such that human will have.
It was a prison
sentence for some,
such as
in the state of Virginia, before this.
A few simple
sentences explaining why the court
in Dresden was Catholic while Saxony was Lutheran (because
in 1697 the elector of Saxony, Friedrich August, opportunistically converted to Catholicism
in order to be elected king of Poland), the differences between Calvinist and Lutheran realms, why Leipzig was a commercial center, and other
such matters would have been helpful.
(What a v.a.gue and useless term
in such a general
sentence as this!)
If though you're
such a prude as to stop reading a
sentence the second you see a curse, then I have no interest
in really changing your mind anyway.
Anyways, most of my arguments can be summed up
in one
sentence: hey, how about you use some common sense, be kind, love everyone, and don't be
such an ass?
Such is the struggle of the family of an American pastor recently
sentenced in Iran to eight years
in prison for his Christian beliefs.
The Delaware court found that a jury not only must decide whether there were «aggravating circumstances» that could justify a death penalty, but also must find, «unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt,» that
such aggravating factors outweigh any mitigating circumstances — the critical determination
in imposing a death
sentence.
For example, a realistic interpretation of the
sentence, «The stone is gray, is that there exists independent of human experience an entity called a «stone» qualified
in a distinctive way
such that the term «gray» is appropriate to it.
Whenever he found his speech growing too modern — which was about every
sentence or two — he ladled
in a few
such Scriptural phrases as «exceeding sore,» «and it came to pass,» etc., and made things satisfactory again.
That last
sentence bears repetition, for it is fundamental to why there is
such a widespread feeling that
in some way our religious observance has by these changes been diminished and devalued: the day «becomes less significantfor being absorbed into the weekly routine».
Two
sentences in the discussion of reason
in the earlier version of the report could be taken to support the use of
such analysis: «By reason we relate our witness to the full range of human knowledge and experience,» and «By our quest for reasoned understandings of Christian faith we seek to grasp and express the gospel
in a way that will commend itself to thoughtful persons who are seeking to know and follow God's ways.»
Turning to Christian tradition, we may note that the Fathers and Doctors of the Church are virtually unanimous
in their support for capital punishment, even though some of them
such as St. Ambrose exhort members of the clergy not to pronounce capital
sentences or serve as executioners.
I mean critics who, like Rainey, love to begin
sentences with formulations like the following: «If it is true, as the logic of poststructuralism asserts, that every erasure will leave its trace
in such a way that the very thing one is trying to exclude is disclosed as the hidden center of a contaminated order, then...» Then what?
One simple but important reason that lifers on parole pose
such a low risk is their age: even before truth -
in -
sentencing, virtually no lifers were released until they reached their late 30s.
Each biblical statement is a
sentence which must be understood
in terms of the vocabulary and grammar of its original language (Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek), but the better modern translations,
such as the Revised Standard Version, have made it possible for one who understands English vocabulary and grammar to read and study the Bible without being seriously misled on most points.
«When
in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another...» But the Declaration then quickly moves,
in the very same
sentence, to the question of by what right or by what authority
such a change is to be made.
A theory technically is defined
in contemporary logic to be a set of
sentences such that any
sentence which logically follows from members
in the set is also
in the set.
It embraces a fruitful abundance of descriptions of God, including all the substantive terms that can legitimately complete the
sentence, «God is...,» beginning with scriptural terms
such as Word, Wisdom, Water of Life, Bread from Heaven, Truth, and Comforter, as well as alternative proper names
such as El Shaddai and also El Roi» Hagar's name for God,
in the only biblical story where a human being gives God a name.
Whitehead's account of the functions of what he terms «symbols
in Symbolism and Process and Reality offers a suggestive attempt at such an extension.4 In the first of these works two basic forms of symbols are distinguished: linguistic expressions in the form of perceived words and sentences and our sense presentations correlated to natural object
in Symbolism and Process and Reality offers a suggestive attempt at
such an extension.4
In the first of these works two basic forms of symbols are distinguished: linguistic expressions in the form of perceived words and sentences and our sense presentations correlated to natural object
In the first of these works two basic forms of symbols are distinguished: linguistic expressions
in the form of perceived words and sentences and our sense presentations correlated to natural object
in the form of perceived words and
sentences and our sense presentations correlated to natural objects.
There are, for example, signals used
in animal communication, nonconventional signals which include some gestures, and single - word
sentences such as the word «Tree» used by children
in the early stages of language acquisition.
The image of a woman who is battered for 20 years by her clergyman husband and who would forgive him, «because the Bible tells her to,» the image of a young mother and father who can not understand why their three - year - old daughter was sexually abused
in the day care center to which they had entrusted her each morning; the image of a woman who was sacked from the women's program of her church because she refused to comply to the request of the president of the church that she and the other women vote for him
in his election campaign; the image of a 14 - year - old migrant domestic worker who faces the death
sentence on trumped up charges, because she would not give
in to the sexual demands of her employer; the image of a male priest of a church saying that every time he beats his wife she should thank him, because she is one step closer to salvation; or the priest who would make sexual advances on a woman who out of vulnerability turns to the church for pastoral comfort... these are but a glimpse of the many
such images that are gathered during the course of this Decade.
In discussing his results, Herman states that they demonstrate the ability of dolphins to respond correctly to semantically reversible sentences, offering «the first substantial evidence of syntactic processing of a string of lexical items by animals» (CSBD 199) 12 Evidence for such syntactic processing is found in the dolphins» correct responses to sentences having modifiers to direct and / or indirect objects: reversal errors were extremely rar
In discussing his results, Herman states that they demonstrate the ability of dolphins to respond correctly to semantically reversible
sentences, offering «the first substantial evidence of syntactic processing of a string of lexical items by animals» (CSBD 199) 12 Evidence for
such syntactic processing is found
in the dolphins» correct responses to sentences having modifiers to direct and / or indirect objects: reversal errors were extremely rar
in the dolphins» correct responses to
sentences having modifiers to direct and / or indirect objects: reversal errors were extremely rare.
Such was the legal position, though
in the eye of orthodox Jews the judgment of the native court was valid
in itself, and Jewish tradition
in the Talmud assumes that the death
sentence was passed by the Sanhedrin; understandably, it ignores the role of the governor altogether.
Yes i know two counsellors i told one of them about this and i want to know why Jesus Christ without any mercy sends that person to hell forever to suffer and never ever forgives them even though they didn't commit any thing like murder and that also forever you can forgive that person went
in minutes of that sin with
in a snap of a finger then only why that sin why not give him another life
in Earth after forgiving and punishing him for the rest of his sin it is said that god and Jesus Is very merciful then why he is giving
such a life
sentence that is much more worse than eternal nothingness and why doesn't he punish Satun with eternal nothingness because i think most of the sins
in Earth are committed because of him only?
In the passage immediately following his six «sentence discussion of the Fifth Way, Aquinas explains the connection: «As Augustine says, since God is the highest good, He would not allow any evil to exist in His works unless His omnipotence and goodness were such as to bring good even out of evi
In the passage immediately following his six «
sentence discussion of the Fifth Way, Aquinas explains the connection: «As Augustine says, since God is the highest good, He would not allow any evil to exist
in His works unless His omnipotence and goodness were such as to bring good even out of evi
in His works unless His omnipotence and goodness were
such as to bring good even out of evil.
One gathers from the Philippians passage, as well as from
such sentences as that quoted from II Corinthians, that far from being embarrassed by the normality of the earthly life, Paul saw
in it a sign of how much Christ had been willing to sacrifice on our behalf.
Just because one can string together English words
in a grammatical
sentence and add a question mark at the end doesn't mean that
such a construct carries any meaning.
In such a society it would make good sense, having
sentenced a convicted man to death, to add, «May God have mercy on your soul.»
DP asserts that no
such escape hatch exists — note the «if»
in the
sentence above — and
in any case seals and padlocks the door which DV has already effectively closed:
I have only ever personally known one person who has undergone
such a trial (a trial
in both senses of the word): Conrad Black, who appointed me editor of The Catholic Herald about ten years ago and who is now serving a six year prison
sentence in Florida.
The second
sentence in the quotation above represents the best political wisdom, but unfortunately
such wisdom does not often flourish
in the midst of revolutions or of the struggles to defend the gains of revolution.
Yet every
sentence is not a proposition; only
such are propositions as have
in them either truth or falsity.
41:13; 43:13; 48:17)
Such sentences in the priest's oracle elicit corresponding statements from the supplicant
in his concluding expression of assurance
in the Kiagelied, as, for example, «thou art my God» (Ps.
The problem I have with this is, none a single
sentence make any sense, what predictions are you referring to, during the times of Christ most people thought he was a joke, it is not a stretch of the imagination to say that most people would reject
such nonsense, I think the original writers are laughing
in their graves at how gullible you all are.
He underscores to
such an extent the inadequacy of expressions or formulations of the truth that it remains unclear how he prevents himself from sliding into the position that inadequacy of expression entails inexpressibility of truth, or prevents interpretations endlessly deferring to other interpretations,
such that we never have a statement that is simply true — even
in Sacred Scripture, and hence that there could be no
such thing as revealed (determinate) truth, expressing itself
in and through
sentences.
This subject remains the non-temporal act of all - inclusive unfettered valuation, that is, God considered as
such in light of the identification made at the outset of
sentence 4 with «It is here termed God.»
It is conceivable that the last three
sentences in the passage from Process 93 are an addition, although no good reason for
such an insertion is evident.
As her body was carried to the grave, her husband summed up
in a single
sentence his conviction about the deathless value of
such a person: «God must not let anything happen to her.»
This insight never left Peter, and it gave rise to
such sentences as, «We need to appreciate the greatness and misery of the guy
in the jogging suit.»