Sentences with phrase «in shared custody arrangements»

In shared custody arrangements, both the mother and father have the same rights.

However, the study's findings challenge assumptions that kids in shared custody arrangements experience more stress due to the social upheaval and unpredictability that comes -LSB-...]

... [W] e firmly believe that the lower court must make flexible application of a Melzer type formula allowing for those anomalies inherent in shared custody arrangements...» Thus, as an alternative to the offset formula method or the downward deviation method, a Melzer needs analysis might be another method for determining child support in shared custody situations.

Support may also be reduced in cases of extended parenting time, such as in shared custody arrangements.

Courts assume that in shared custody arrangements each parent pays for a considerable percentage of child - related expenses while the kids are with them.

In shared custody arrangements, both parents share decision making responsibility for the child and often split parenting time more equally.

In a shared custody arrangement, a court first calculates a support amount for each parent based on the parent's time share.

For example a spouse with significant income in a shared custody arrangement of one child has more to gain from this credit than a spouse with little to no taxable income.

Examples of additional expenses which may be assessed to either parent in support of child (ren) in a shared custody arrangement include:

In a shared custody arrangement, the percentage of time the children reside with each parent can change the rules for child support.

Some kids may even fair better in a shared custody arrangement than if they lived with both parents who no longer wanted to be married.

Not exact matches

This aspect of divorce, at least in their situation, actually makes me jealous of divorced parents and shared custody arrangements.

(Y) oung adults who lived in sole - custody arrangements expressed more feelings of loss and more often viewed their lives through the lens of divorce, compared to those young adults who grew up in more shared physical custody arrangements.

Shared parenting is simply a collaborative arrangement in which both parents share custody of their children.

A Nebraska court will place a child in a joint or shared custody arrangement if both parents agree to the arrangement.

In addition, New Jersey courts tend to encourage a shared, joint custody arrangement wherever possible.

In a joint custody arrangement, parents share custody of their child, as opposed to sole custody, where one parent has full custody.

Divorced parents provide care to their children in any number of ways, from the traditional custody / visitation arrangement to more equitable shared custody plans.

In true «joint custody» arrangements, parents share equal «legal custody» and «physical custody» rights.

In the case of sole custody, the other parent may still be allowed some visitation, though it will be much more limited than in a shared legal custody / physical custody arrangemenIn the case of sole custody, the other parent may still be allowed some visitation, though it will be much more limited than in a shared legal custody / physical custody arrangemenin a shared legal custody / physical custody arrangement.

Our custody and parenting arrangement lawyers led by Lorne N. MacLean, QC, have noticed how custody and parenting arrangements have progressed over time moving from the one primary parent theory in the 1970's to joint custody in the 1980's and 1990's but not necessarily equal time to the now more common 50/50 shared parenting time regimes.

Many parents will share the custodial rights in a joint custody arrangement, or by an order giving the access parent extra rights.

While parents who have a shared parenting arrangement will also generally have joint custody, the reverse is not always true: joint custody is often ordered in the absence of shared parenting.

Although no federal laws specifically address custody, parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the children.

These results may be a function of Alberta's generally more conservative political and social values but are more likely a consequence of the geographic separation of parents owing to lengthy periods of site - based work in the oil patch or the interprovincial relocation of separated parents to take work in the province, making shared custody arrangements difficult if not impossible to implement.

Time - sharing, parenting plans, and shared parental responsibilities are terms that are commonly used by courts to ensure that the custody arrangement does not alienate one parent in favor of the other.

Nonetheless, in this case the court made some complex mathematical adjustments to support; this included an adjustment to account for the fact that, before the parties started their shared parenting arrangement, the mother had sole custody of the child and was legally entitled to receive appropriate child support from the father for that period.

In reality, shared custody is a type of access arrangement, and does not have anything to do with which parent has legal decision - making power.

S. 9 of the FCSG — if one spouse has the right to access or custody of child for 40 % or more of time over the year, quantum of support based on amount set out in table, increased cost of shared custody arrangement and condition, means, needs and other circumstances of each spouse and of the children;

[13] He considered (1) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Ms. G; (2) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Mr. S; (3) the desirability of maximizing contact between the children and both parents; (4) the views of the children, which had not been canvassed; (5) Ms. G's reason for moving; (6) the disruption to the children of a change in custody; (7) the disruption to the children consequent on removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such as Mr. S's economic stability, the importance of the paternal grandparents, the location of the proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his children, and Ms. G's inflexibility.

Instead of each parent sharing the decision - making for their child in every respect as in a traditional joint custody arrangement, in a parallel parenting regime, parents assume full decision - making responsibility for different domains.

In reaching an appropriate child support figure, the court must consider the overall situation of shared custody, the costs to each parent of the arrangement and the overall needs, resources and situation of each parent.

Particularly in a joint custody or shared residency arrangement that has been found to be in the child's best interests, the reasons for one parent to want to move, effectively ending what has already been found to be in the child's best interests, would be very relevant to determining whether the child's needs can be met in this proposed new arrangement.

In T.K. the Court of Appeal recognizes that it is more problematic to extend «respect» to the stated reasons for a move in cases where there has been no previous determination with respect to custody, or where there is a pre-existing joint custody order or de facto joint custody / shared residency arrangemenIn T.K. the Court of Appeal recognizes that it is more problematic to extend «respect» to the stated reasons for a move in cases where there has been no previous determination with respect to custody, or where there is a pre-existing joint custody order or de facto joint custody / shared residency arrangemenin cases where there has been no previous determination with respect to custody, or where there is a pre-existing joint custody order or de facto joint custody / shared residency arrangement.

After considering the jurisprudence with respect to the double - bind question, the Court found that the risk of it resulting in a presumptive disposition may be greater where a joint custody or shared residency arrangement requiring both parents to reside in the same locale is in the best interests of the child.

A general definition was developed in several decisions by the California District Courts of Appeal, in the years following Burgess holding that a shared custody arrangement exists if the noncustodial parent had physical custody at least 40 % of the time.

In Colorado, the term «shared custody» refers to a living arrangement where children divide their time between both parents» households.

Custody laws in Iowa define joint legal custody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for theCustody laws in Iowa define joint legal custody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for thecustody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for the child.

However, where the parents have a shared custodial arrangement, the trial court was required to make a full redetermination of what custody order was in the best interests of the children.

In recent years, the label of shared / joint physical custody has become more commonly used in describing a parenting arrangement; however, actual 50 - 50 sharing of the child is still NOT the norm or most common parenting plan the court adopts or that parents choosIn recent years, the label of shared / joint physical custody has become more commonly used in describing a parenting arrangement; however, actual 50 - 50 sharing of the child is still NOT the norm or most common parenting plan the court adopts or that parents choosin describing a parenting arrangement; however, actual 50 - 50 sharing of the child is still NOT the norm or most common parenting plan the court adopts or that parents choose.

In Colorado, the term «shared custody» refers to shared physical living arrangements, and the term «joint custody» refers to shared decision making.

If parents live in close proximity and have an amicable and cooperative relationship, the court may be willing to grant what is known as a shared residential custody arrangement.

In such a scenario, joint custody pertains only to a sharing of the decision - making responsibilities whereas physical care is determinative of the living arrangements.

There are different kinds of physical custody arrangements, including sole, in which one parent has physical custody, and shared, in which each parent has physical custody for part of the time.

Sole legal custody is an arrangement in which one parent has sole authority to make decisions about the child, even though the parents may still share joint physical custody.

In Florida, parenting plans known as time sharing have replaced traditional custody arrangements.

Below, we're going to detail a bit of the history of divorce and custody and the specifics of why Florida defaults to shared custody arrangements except in very specific situations, such as when one parent is involved in drugs, domestic violence, or other criminal activities.

Ohio courts generally prefer joint legal custody arrangements, in which parents share decision - making authority but one parent provides the child's primary place of residence.

Sometimes shared custodians request the court to modify the physical custody arrangements while leaving shared legal custody in place.

Joint Legal Custody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's wCustody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's wcustody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's welfare.