Sentences with phrase «in subsequent paragraphs»

In subsequent paragraphs, you should point to evidence that supports the assertions in your introductory statement.

In subsequent paragraphs, you should provide examples of how and where you applied those skills.

When the territorial jurisdiction of the judicial district is put into question by the defendant, via a motion for declinatory exception, the plaintiff must then prove that one of the exceptional cases set forth in the subsequent paragraphs of art. 68 C.C.P. applies.

Having recognised the value of marriage, in the subsequent paragraphs (48 - 52) it expands upon the Church's understanding of marriage:

If you wish to see the effects of a different ADM on funding for your school division in those accounts where funding is based on ADM, please use the Excel calculation file described in a subsequent paragraph.)

Not exact matches

These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

-- For purposes of paragraph (2)(C), in determining whether a first or subsequent violation has occurred, a determination in a single action, by judgment or settlement, that the covered entity has engaged in more than one discriminatory act shall be counted as a single violation.

So in my subsequent online discussions of the research with my veterinary colleagues, I found that very few bothered to read more than the summary paragraph.

On topic: I do agree with at least one thing in the Rayner - Prins paper: «Put public investment in energy R&D on a wartime footing» and the subsequent paragraph.

«(ii) has emitted, produced, imported, manufactured, or delivered in 2008 or any subsequent year more than the applicable threshold level in the definition of covered entity in paragraph (13) of section 700, provided that the figure of 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent is read instead as 10,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent and the figure of 460,000,000 cubic feet is read instead as 184,000,000 cubic feet;

In response to a mandate by COP 7 (paragraph 2 (b) in decision 11 / CP.7), SBSTA 21 (FCCC / SBSTA / 2004 / 13, paragraph 35) discussed the possible application of biome - specific forest definitions for the second and subsequent commitment periodIn response to a mandate by COP 7 (paragraph 2 (b) in decision 11 / CP.7), SBSTA 21 (FCCC / SBSTA / 2004 / 13, paragraph 35) discussed the possible application of biome - specific forest definitions for the second and subsequent commitment periodin decision 11 / CP.7), SBSTA 21 (FCCC / SBSTA / 2004 / 13, paragraph 35) discussed the possible application of biome - specific forest definitions for the second and subsequent commitment periods.

Reference is made particularly to the judgment of the Constitutional Court no. 138/10 in the first two applicants» case, the findings of which were reiterated in a series of subsequent judgments in the following years (see some examples at paragraph 45 above).

After reviewing the key paragraphs of the Court of Appeal's judgment in Mitchell and a number of subsequent authorities as well as outlining the principal criticisms which had been leveled against that case, the Court of Appeal went on to set out the new guidance.

However, much of this statement can be considered obiter, given the subsequent qualifiers in the following paragraph, and the context of a majority - concurring decision.

While this is very true of course, I am a bit puzzled by the subsequent paragraphs of the judgment relating to the role of NCA's and the assistance they can give to undertakings in providing legal certainty.

The last sentence in (c), and paragraph (d), with respect, would no longer appear to be valid considerations, given the subsequent decision of the Court of Appeal in Hamilton, supra.

33 The parties agree that if the Management Board of Cabinet endorses recommendations referenced in paragraph 30 or 31, or some variation of those recommendations, the Chair of Management Board shall make every effort to implement them at the earliest possible date, following subsequent approval from Cabinet.

In the matter of Motley & Others v Shadwell Park Ltd, the Court of Appeal (Sharp LJ and Henderson LJ) considered whether Mr Justice Soole acted outside the ambit of his reasonable discretion in granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datIn the matter of Motley & Others v Shadwell Park Ltd, the Court of Appeal (Sharp LJ and Henderson LJ) considered whether Mr Justice Soole acted outside the ambit of his reasonable discretion in granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datIn granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial date.

(i) If a statement of disagreement has been submitted by the individual, the covered entity must include the material appended in accordance with paragraph (d)(4) of this section, or, at the election of the covered entity, an accurate summary of any such information, with any subsequent disclosure of the protected health information to which the disagreement relates.

(ii) If the individual has not submitted a written statement of disagreement, the covered entity must include the individual's request for amendment and its denial, or an accurate summary of such information, with any subsequent disclosure of the protected health information only if the individual has requested such action in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section.

Minimize the content in your cover letter to reflect the following formula: one introductory paragraph (three lines), a secondary paragraph that tells a narrative (five lines), a phrase that introduces your key accomplishments, a subsequent paragraph that briefly highlights any additional skills you want to touch upon (three lines), and finally a general closing statement (two lines).

(c) In any subsequent Title IV - D child support enforcement action between the parties, upon sufficient showing that diligent effort has been made to ascertain the location of such a party, the court of competent jurisdiction shall deem state due process requirements for notice and service of process to be met with respect to the party, upon delivery of written notice to the most recent residential or employer address filed with the tribunal and State Case Registry pursuant to paragraph (a).

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (a), the existence of such subsequent children should not as a general rule be considered by the court as a basis for disregarding the amount provided in the guidelines schedule.

(2) The making of an order of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(ba), or of any other order under this Part, in relation to the maintenance of a party to a marriage does not prevent a court from making a subsequent order in relation to the maintenance of the party.

(2) The making of an order of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(c), or of any other order under this Division, in relation to the maintenance of a child does not prevent a court from making a subsequent order in relation to the maintenance of the child.