In the eyes of the law pets are property.
«
In the eyes of the law a pet is considered a «chattel», a personal effect to be considered in exactly the same way as a table, lamp, car etc..
Not exact matches
In the
eyes of the
law,
Peter Nielsen is presumed innocent till proven guilty after an adversarial trial process.
Peter, a bright -
eyed and fluffy - tailed new attorney, witnesses the «hit»
of the managing partner
in his
law firm.
You see, if
pets are treated more like people than property
in the
eyes of the
law, the legality
of selling
pets and
pet ownership come into question.
Remember that
in the
eyes of the
law,
pets are property.