In valid interpretation we feel our way into each symbol in order to sense the surplus of meaning that beckons us beyond ourselves to discover something new.
Not exact matches
My leadership
in the past has used the book (not trying to be disrespectful), and specifically their
interpretation as the only
valid one, to remove my freedom to think for myself.
There might be many
interpretations, but not all are equally
valid, and
in the conflict of
interpretations the text itself can mediate.
In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann made use of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles of
interpretation may survive, still seem
valid, when the misty vocabulary of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.
In one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himsel
In one sense this criticism is indeed
valid, for
in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himsel
in this
interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality»
in himsel
in himself.
In a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretatio
In a religious view such as that outlined
in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretatio
in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently
valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of
interpretation.
We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters
in the first century used very different methods from ours and some of the
interpretations which men of those days found very convincing may no longer seem
valid to us.
Rachel's
interpretation is just as
valid as anyone else's: you're all deluded if you believe
in imaginary creatures.
So, this means that there is ONE
valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text
in such a way as to make people ponder various
interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible wa
In this paper, I want to challenge this
interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the
interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a
valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues
in an intelligible wa
in an intelligible war.
Whitehead's interpretive system is dynamic
in its rationalism and does not limit
valid interpretation to philosophers and scientists.
According to Steve scripture is by the prophet's own
interpretation, which
in reality is no more
valid than ours.
It's not a
valid excuse for such a being, to say that the flaw is
in the
interpretations by readers; such a purportedly divine being should be perfectly (yes, stress that word «perfectly»!)-RRB-
It is God's divine word
in print and therefore has the only
valid interpretation.
In addition, no regulating body was able to provide a clear and enforceable definition of a
valid vendor, which means that enforcement is, at best, contextual and subject to
interpretation.
But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars
in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more
valid interpretation of the evidence.
In that case they could both be fair reflections of the science — within certain limits there doesn't have to be just one single
valid interpretation.
From a scientific point of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead of logarithmically; the
interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is
in store than we're currently seeing, is both
valid and very important.
Courts on judicial review do view expertise as a
valid doctrinal reason for deference, and are willing to put aside their own
interpretation of a statute
in favour of a decision - maker's.
But Graham says that since fiction lets you know exactly what's going on
in the mind of a character — which you can't
in real life — and persuades you to take a character's painstakingly edited
interpretation of an event as the only
valid interpretation, it can be troublesome to take a novel - reading mentality into reality.
The Privy Council
in Edwards accepted the Lambe proposition as being generally
valid, but added that the BNA Act should not be construed strictly, as penal or tax statutes are, and should instead be given a liberal
interpretation since it was «passed to ensure the peace, order and good government of a British Colony.»
People who object to that purported obligation would at least have some concrete language and
interpretation they could debate, and their concerns, to the extent
valid, could be reflected
in authoritative language
in the commentary.
Stare decisis's most prominent cost is binding judges to
interpretations of law that they find unpersuasive, raising the fundamental question of when and why such a restraint on judges» decision - making autonomy is justified.30
In an ideal world, stare decisis would insulate
valid principles of law from arbitrary and unprincipled revision without entrenching «bad» precedent against further review.31
In reality, stare decisis hinders defection from both appealing and unappealing precedent.
Insisting upon this
interpretation of the LAA is not to be regarded as denying the attainment of the constitutionally
valid purposes of legislation, enacted
in concededly broad terms.
In Lardil Kaiadilt, Yangkaal & Ganagalidda v State of Queensland (50) a severely restricted
interpretation of «future act» by Cooper J. has meant that where procedural rights of native title holders or claimants are disregarded by decision - makers, the decision will nevertheless be
valid.
Regarding your comment: «It would seem that your
interpretation written that the concept is illegal, as
in meaning «against the law,» is not
valid / correct.