Sentences with phrase «in valid interpretation»

In valid interpretation we feel our way into each symbol in order to sense the surplus of meaning that beckons us beyond ourselves to discover something new.

Not exact matches

My leadership in the past has used the book (not trying to be disrespectful), and specifically their interpretation as the only valid one, to remove my freedom to think for myself.
There might be many interpretations, but not all are equally valid, and in the conflict of interpretations the text itself can mediate.
In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann made use of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles of interpretation may survive, still seem valid, when the misty vocabulary of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.
In one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himselIn one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himselin this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himselin himself.
In a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretatioIn a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretatioin this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretation.
We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters in the first century used very different methods from ours and some of the interpretations which men of those days found very convincing may no longer seem valid to us.
Rachel's interpretation is just as valid as anyone else's: you're all deluded if you believe in imaginary creatures.
So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible waIn this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible wain an intelligible war.
Whitehead's interpretive system is dynamic in its rationalism and does not limit valid interpretation to philosophers and scientists.
According to Steve scripture is by the prophet's own interpretation, which in reality is no more valid than ours.
It's not a valid excuse for such a being, to say that the flaw is in the interpretations by readers; such a purportedly divine being should be perfectly (yes, stress that word «perfectly»!)-RRB-
It is God's divine word in print and therefore has the only valid interpretation.
In addition, no regulating body was able to provide a clear and enforceable definition of a valid vendor, which means that enforcement is, at best, contextual and subject to interpretation.
But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more valid interpretation of the evidence.
In that case they could both be fair reflections of the science — within certain limits there doesn't have to be just one single valid interpretation.
From a scientific point of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead of logarithmically; the interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is in store than we're currently seeing, is both valid and very important.
Courts on judicial review do view expertise as a valid doctrinal reason for deference, and are willing to put aside their own interpretation of a statute in favour of a decision - maker's.
But Graham says that since fiction lets you know exactly what's going on in the mind of a character — which you can't in real life — and persuades you to take a character's painstakingly edited interpretation of an event as the only valid interpretation, it can be troublesome to take a novel - reading mentality into reality.
The Privy Council in Edwards accepted the Lambe proposition as being generally valid, but added that the BNA Act should not be construed strictly, as penal or tax statutes are, and should instead be given a liberal interpretation since it was «passed to ensure the peace, order and good government of a British Colony.»
People who object to that purported obligation would at least have some concrete language and interpretation they could debate, and their concerns, to the extent valid, could be reflected in authoritative language in the commentary.
Stare decisis's most prominent cost is binding judges to interpretations of law that they find unpersuasive, raising the fundamental question of when and why such a restraint on judges» decision - making autonomy is justified.30 In an ideal world, stare decisis would insulate valid principles of law from arbitrary and unprincipled revision without entrenching «bad» precedent against further review.31 In reality, stare decisis hinders defection from both appealing and unappealing precedent.
Insisting upon this interpretation of the LAA is not to be regarded as denying the attainment of the constitutionally valid purposes of legislation, enacted in concededly broad terms.
In Lardil Kaiadilt, Yangkaal & Ganagalidda v State of Queensland (50) a severely restricted interpretation of «future act» by Cooper J. has meant that where procedural rights of native title holders or claimants are disregarded by decision - makers, the decision will nevertheless be valid.
Regarding your comment: «It would seem that your interpretation written that the concept is illegal, as in meaning «against the law,» is not valid / correct.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z