LONDON, 13 July 2014 −
Inaction over climate change costs lives.
However of all the things these guys can be accused of,
inaction over climate change is the weakest charge of all.
Not exact matches
@ 196 Ray... John Howard is an EX politician and former PM who lost his seat in 2007 primarily
over Climate Change inaction and asylum seeker policies.
Given that the United States and most other developed anions have for
over twenty - five years failed to adequately respond to
climate change because of alleged unacceptable costs to each nation and that due to the delay ghg emissions reductions now needed to avoid potentially catastrophic
climate change are much steeper and costly than what would be required if these nations acted twenty five years ago, is it just for the United States and other developed nations to now defend further
inaction on
climate change on the basis of cost to it?
The Costs of
Inaction In public discussion, the
climate -
change skeptics have clearly been gaining ground
over the past couple of years, even though the odds have been looking good lately that 2010 could be the warmest year on record.