Not exact matches
All the
land was already
claimed by one
indian group or another.
At the time, law enforcement
claimed that they were breaking the law by selling cigarette's tax free to non-
Indian customers, because the US Supreme Court ruled that
Indian Nations couldn't
claim sovereignty over
land they purchased.
The case is often referred to as Oneida I because it is the first of three times the Oneida
Indian Nation reached the Supreme Court in litigating its
land rights
claims.
Filed by Protect the Adirondacks and Adirondack Wild, the lawsuit
claims the Adirondack Park Agency and Department of Environmental Conservation broke state law in approving plans for former timber company
land centered around the Essex Chain of Lakes between
Indian Lake and Newcomb in Essex and Hamilton counties.
The larger portion of the Oneida
claim, to the 6 - million - acre (24,000 km2) tract, was rejected by the Second Circuit in 1988 on the grounds that the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783 had neither the authority nor the intent to limit the acquisition of
Indian lands within the borders of US states.
The original suit in this matter was the first modern - day Native American
land claim litigated in the federal court system rather than before the
Indian Claims Commission.
The payments stem from a 2013 deal that settled long - standing disputes between New York state and the Oneida
Indian Nation over
land claims, taxation and gambling proceeds.
Tenney has been a vocal opponent of the agreements struck by the state, local governments and the Oneida
Indian Nation that created exclusivity clauses in exchange for the settlement of long - standing
land claims as well as revenue sharing agreements.
The 2013 deal settled long - standing disputes between New York state and the Oneida
Indian Nation over
land claims, taxation and gambling proceeds.
Native American Occupation While Alcatraz stood empty and the federal government debated its fate, a boatload of 89 Native Americans
claimed the island as «
Indian land.»
They
claim that the mine could drain acid into the nearby Salmon Trout River and disturb
land considered sacred to a local
Indian tribe.
We have extensive experience assisting clients with federal, state,
Indian, private - surface and minerals - leasing and purchase transactions and locating mining
claims on Bureau of
Land Management, Forest Service and split estate
lands.
It makes unnecessary the two step analysis of the applicability of provincial laws suggested by s. 88 of the
Indian Act, RSC 1985, c I - 5 (at least so far as provincial laws are
claimed to apply to «
Indians» rather than «
lands reserved») and the Court's decision in Dick, [1985] 2 SCR 309 — in fact we don't need s. 88 any longer since there are no longer any inapplicable provincial laws that need to be made applicable by operation of a federal statute.
In 2011, the governments signed a
land claim deal with leaders representing 2,400 Innu
Indians of Labrador.
Lawyers who have never had an Indigenous client are more likely to think about
land claims, the
Indian Residential Schools Settlement, or Gladue reports in criminal court.
Business Development: Brokering various business dealings that further the diversification of
Indian economies Developing and accessing commercial financial programs and services for tribal governments, including tax - exempt offerings and federally - guaranteed housing loans Serving as issuer or underwriter's counsel in tribal bond issuances Ensuring tribal compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and other federal financial regulatory requirements Handling federal and state income, excise, B&O, property and other tax matters for tribes and tribal businesses Chartering tribal business enterprises under tribal, state and federal law Registering and protecting tribal trademarks and copyrights Negotiating franchise agreements for restaurants and retail stores on
Indian reservations Custom - tailoring construction contracts for tribes and general contractors Helping secure federal SBA 8 (a) and other contracting preferences for
Indian - owned businesses Facilitating contractual relations between tribes and tribal casinos, and gaming vendors Building tribal workers» compensation and self - insurance programs Government Relations: Handling state and federal regulatory matters in the areas of tribal gaming, environmental and cultural resources, workers» compensation, taxation, health care and education Negotiating tribal - state gaming compacts and fuel and cigarette compacts, and inter-local
land use and law enforcement agreements Advocacy before the Washington State Gambling Commission, Washington
Indian Gaming Association and National
Indian Gaming Commission Preparing tribal codes and regulations, including tribal court, commercial, gaming, taxation, energy development, environmental and cultural resources protection, labor & employment, and workers» compensation laws Developing employee handbooks, manuals and personnel policies Advocacy in areas of treaty rights, gaming, jurisdiction, taxation, environmental and cultural resource protection Brokering fee - to - trust and related real estate and jurisdictional transactions Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex
Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax,
land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement
claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal r
claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property
claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal r
claims under the
Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal r
Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort
claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal r
claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort
Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal r
Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and
Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our
Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «
Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide
Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal rights.
Many First Nations governments are increasingly assuming responsibility for
land - use planning, whether through the Indian Act, the First Nations Land Management Act, or within the context of modern land claims agreeme
land - use planning, whether through the
Indian Act, the First Nations
Land Management Act, or within the context of modern land claims agreeme
Land Management Act, or within the context of modern
land claims agreeme
land claims agreements.
Lawyers advising First Nations on these issues should have a strong background in employment law principles and human rights, particularly since the Canadian Human Rights Code applies to all aspects of
Indian band governance, including governance structures under modern
land claims agreements.
The Specific
Claims Tribunal determined Williams Lake had established the validity of the
claim against the federal Crown: there were pre-emptive purchases of the
lands by settlers, in contravention of colonial policy and law; such contraventions constituted a breach of a legal obligation, pursuant to colonial legislation pertaining to reserved
lands; B.C. failed to act honourably and was in breach of its fiduciary duties at common law, by failing to put the
Indian interest in settlement
lands ahead of settlers» interests; Canada was liable for B.C.'s pre-Confederation breaches of legislation and fiduciary duty, pursuant to the Act; and Canada also breached its post-Confederation fiduciary duties by failing to provide reserve
lands to Williams Lake.
Long Plain First Nation et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. 2015 FCA 177
Indians, Inuit and Métis Summary: A number of Manitoba First Nations Bands, as successors to the signatories to an 1871
land agreement known as Treaty No. 1, made various
claims as to real property located within Winnipeg, known as the Kapyong Barracks; specifically, the piece comprising 159.62 acres, including operational premises previously used by the Canadian armed forces.
The Métis children's
lands were to be granted «to individual Métis children», despite the fact that the Court had found that one major purpose was «to extinguish any
Indian title» that the Métis might have
claimed.»
[44] That said, I think that the plain and ordinary meaning of the words «will be» in the relevant provision is sufficiently mandatory to indicate an obligation upon Canada to consider and settle
Indian claims for compensation for
lands required for the purposes of settlement.
This feature story notes New York and other defendants» request to the Second Circuit to uphold the dismissal of the Shinnecock
Indian Nation's complaint saying the appeals court's precedent of denying such tribal
land claims is well - settled.
Craft, a descendant of Manitoba Métis Louis Riel who practises at the Public Interest Law Centre in Winnipeg, notes aboriginal law has come a long way in recent years: until the early 1950s, the
Indian Act banned First Nations from hiring lawyers to pursue
land claims.
Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. 2014 NUCA 2 Contracts —
Indians, Inuit and Métis — Practice Summary: This action was started by Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (Tunngavik), a body created to assist in implementing a comprehensive
Land Claims Agreement between the Inuit and Canada.
This was an action of ejectment for
lands in the State and District of Illinois,
claimed by the plaintiffs under a purchase and conveyance from the Piankeshaw
Indians and by the defendant under a grant from the United States.
Such negotiated settlements have covered matters such as gaming on
Indian reserves, child welfare, and in the case of Alaska, major Aboriginal title and
land claim issues.