While these considerations are highly relevant to all areas of
Indigenous policy making, HREOC further notes that the second half of the Committee's Inquiry is particularly focused on reporting on:
In trying to provide a snapshot of the status of
Indigenous policy making and achievements by governments over the past year, it is difficult to see any consistent forward trend.
The relationship between media coverage and
Indigenous policy making has been investigated in a comprehensive research project, whose findings were reported at a recent symposium at the University of Canberra.
The relationship between media coverage and
Indigenous policy making has been investigated in a comprehensive research project, whose findings were reported at a recent symposium at the Univ...
One of the major problems with
Indigenous policy making in Australia is that it is not sufficiently targeted to overcome the existing level of inequality and discrimination experienced by Indigenous peoples.
The compliance mentality that currently permeates
Indigenous policy making processes does not address this full sweep of issues.
Finally, good
Indigenous policy making also requires a focus on compliance with human rights and action to redress known violations of human rights.
Given the urgent need for sound policy in Indigenous affairs, it is timely to consider what some of the key elements of good
Indigenous policy making are.
Not exact matches
Tell us a little about how, in response to dialog with
indigenous theologians and activists, InterVarsity
made policies to submit to the spiritual authority of original peoples regarding the land.
«It can be difficult for people who want to buy authentic
Indigenous art and souvenirs to
make informed decisions and support
Indigenous artists and communities,» says CHOICE head of campaigns and
policy Sarah Agar.
The results suggest that there should be: improvements to
policy and management to champion biodiversity issues; a strengthening of environmental laws and enforcement; recognition of socio - economic issues especially among
indigenous and local communities; increases in funding and resource allocation; knowledge, research and development to inform decision
making; a greater understanding and protection of the rights of nature and cultural heritage; a more holistic public awareness and participation to bring about change to promote conservation.
Indigenous consumers will receive back premiums they paid within the first 5 months if they cancelled the
policy or stopped
making payments on the
policy within that time.
The latter part is more original stuff, as I (i)
make the case for how China's clean energy push is in fact consistent with its overall economic reform, e.g. Scientific Development, reduction of excess industrial capacity, natural resource price reform, western development, boosting domestic consumption, and Going Out strategy; (ii) describe China's activities in innovation and R&D and its desire to create, not just produce, energy technologies of the 21st century; (iii) address criticisms that China's «
indigenous innovation»
policies are protectionist in nature by pointing out the myopia of such observations from a US (or EU for that matter) policymakers point of view; (iv) provide thoughts about what the proper U.S.
policy response should be.
To
make matters worse, the Federal government promoted
policies that encourage deforestation, including stopping efforts to mark the borders of
indigenous lands in the Amazon, dismantled FUNAI (the federal organization for
indigenous issues), and effectively removing protections of those areas of the country that have the lowest deforestation rates,
indigenous people's lands.
A new report «Mapping REDD + and Land Use Financial Flows in Brazil» by research organizations Forest Trends and IDESAM shows how over US$ 2.2 billion in REDD + funds have been used by Brazil to implement deforestation
policies, and highlights new ways to
make these investments more effective at reducing emissions, including by
making payments directly available to the stakeholders who are implementing the deforestation
policies such as subnational governments, farmers, local communities and
indigenous Peoples of the Amazon.
The Empowering Arctic
Indigenous Scholars and
Making Connections program creates a space for
Indigenous scholars to educate and inform
policy - and decision - makers engaged in Arctic Issues while visiting Washington, D.C. and provides a platform for traditional knowledge holders to share their expertise with the wider Arctic research community.
-- In response to Toshiba's failings, one of India's leading nuclear
policy experts is calling for the government to scrap existing plans with Areva, Westinghouse and Russia's Rosatom, and «
Make Nuclear Indian Again» by scaling up the country's
indigenous design.
The OHRC has the power under the Code to request this type of information, and then
make further investigations as to whether the «structures,
policies, processes, decision -
making practices and organizational cultures adversely affect
Indigenous and Black families, and potentially violate Ontario's Human Rights Code.»
Tags for this Online Resume: Human Resources Manager, Human Resources Director, Senior Human Resources Manager, Strategic Human Resources Management, Research, Competency models, People review, HR Communications, Employee Engagement and Employment Brand Management, Managing a Results Driven Team, Strategic Business Planning and Reporting, Group Facilitation and Conflict Resolution, Culture Change and Managing Diversity, Organisation Restructuring, Recruitment and Retention, Compensation and Benefits, Managing Skill Shortages, Industrial Relations, Safety and the Environment, Executive Coaching and Mentoring, Corporate Services Management, Project Management, Distance management, Remote location, Senior Business Partner, Private sector, Public sector, Education sector, Professional Services, Health sector, Housing sector, Risk and assurance, Information Technology, IT, Hospitality sector, Legal sector, Accounting sector, Strategic Agility, Influencing and Negotiating, Developing Recruitment Strategies and Corporate Training Programmes, Diversity Management, including
Indigenous Human Resources Development, Human Resources Development, People Management, Improving business performance through Organisation Development, Technical Knowledge, Problem Solving and Decision
Making, Navigate Hurdles and Sensitive Issues, Client Responsiveness, Communication, Consulting and Monitoring, Team Development, Leadership and Achievement, Integrity, Honesty and Trust, Professionalism and Self Management, Relationship Building and Working with Others, Relationship Management, Continuous Improvement, International Industry Expert,
Policy Development, Appreciative Inquiry, Coaching, Mentoring, Technical Training, Employment Brand Manager, Executive, Legislation, Employee relations, Unions, Fellow, Certified, Outstanding employee, Succession Planning, Career Development, Analysis and targeted development of talent and high potential programmes, Performance Management, Collective Bargaining and Disputes Resolution, Health and Safety, Employee Wellness, Employee Assistance Programmes, Pyschographic Profiling, Not - for - profit sector, Building sector, Emergency Management, Business Continuity, Risk Management, Compliance, Governance, Pandemic Planning and Risk Mitigation, People Capability, Media sector, Advising, Leadership and management development
This report outlines in detail the importance of ensuring engagement and participation of
Indigenous peoples in
policy making and decision
making processes that directly relate to our interests.
That is because these gains are not the outcomes of government
policy or legislation, they are gains deriving from the inherent right of
Indigenous people to
make decisions in relation to the issues that affect them including decisions over their land and their resources.
To ensure this can occur, the United Nations Permanent Forum on
Indigenous Issues recommended that all states ensure
Indigenous peoples are well resourced and supported to
make those decisions including through providing
policy support, technical assistance, funding and capacity - building.
It is now time for us to flesh out these commitments to ensure the full participation of
Indigenous peoples in
policy making processes.
The Tasmanian Government has
made a short - term appointment of an
Indigenous officer within the Department of Health and Community Affairs whose remit has been to «develop a
policy framework and establish protocols and procedures that ensure that Aboriginal people have appropriate access to personal information held by the Department and other agencies» [76].
Governments and
Indigenous peoples must exploit this window of opportunity to build on native title agreement
making processes and
policies to ensure that sustainable and meaningful improvements and advancements for
Indigenous Australians are realised within this generation.
For a review of the importance of
Indigenous representation in government
policy making and service delivery, see Chapter 3 of the Social Justice Report 2005.
The Native Title Report argues that the new arrangements provide an opportunity to take a fresh look at the way in which native title
policies and agreement
making are structured, in order to deliver better economic and social outcomes for
Indigenous peoples.
The Committee recommends that the State party may reconsider the withdrawal of existing guarantees for the effective representative participation of
indigenous peoples in the conduct of public affairs as well as in decision and
policy -
making relating to their rights and interests.
The Review is being overseen by a Steering Committee
made up of the Attorney - General's Department, the Office of
Indigenous Policy Coordination, the Registrar of the Federal Court and the President or member of the NNTT.
«The public sector is
making significant and radical changes in the way it develops and implements government
policy and these new processes and concepts are being tested in the
Indigenous policy arena.
My role as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner is to monitor and report to the federal Parliament on the ability of
Indigenous peoples in Australia to enjoy their human rights, and to identify where legal or
policy changes could be
made to improve such enjoyment.
It is notable that in the absence of a National
Indigenous Representative Body, the commitments through COAG and bilateral agreements that set the basis for the relationship between governments and
policy directions for
Indigenous affairs, have been
made without any
Indigenous participation or consultation.
In an effort to standardise approaches to
policy implementation in the APS, and ultimately improve policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy implementation in the APS, and ultimately improve
policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy outcomes, the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have recently produced the Better Practice Guide to the Implementation of Programme and
Policy Initiatives — Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
Policy Initiatives —
Making Implementation Matter (or the Better Practice Guide).3 Although this publication is a general guide for
policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across th
policy makers across all portfolios — not just in the areas of
Indigenous affairs — it represents the collective wisdom and experience of senior managers and executives across the APS.
The realisation of the challenges discussed above can be minimised if
policy is developed that considers the contributions that
Indigenous people can
make to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change.
The federal government's tendency to deliver important
policy decisions in
Indigenous affairs as a fait accompli — even to territory and state governments — raises serious concerns about the ability of
Indigenous communities to negotiate as equal partners in the many agreement
making processes that have been introduced with the new arrangements.
In fact, since the abolition of ATSIC they had moved further and further away from the systemic involvement of
Indigenous peoples in
policy making processes.
In launching the Best Practice Guide to
policy implementation, the Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (Dr Shergold)
made the following comments about the importance of leadership within the public service that are of particular relevance for
Indigenous affairs:
The public sector is
making significant and radical changes in the way it develops and implements government
policy through a «whole of government» approach, and these new processes and concepts are being tested in the
Indigenous policy arena.
For an evaluation of the capacity for
Indigenous engagement and participation in
policy making under the «new arrangements», see Chapter 3 of the Social Justice Report 2006.
Similarly, the basic structure of the new arrangements for service delivery and
policy development has now been in place for long enough to assess whether they are capable of meeting the extensive commitments
made by all Australian governments to address the social and economic disadvantage experienced by
Indigenous Australians.
The Report covers a broad range of issues extending from the local level (with
Indigenous perspectives on Shared Responsibility Agreements), regional and national levels (considering the capacity for
Indigenous participation and engagement in federal
policy making processes), through to the international level (with a review of developments on
Indigenous human rights over the past four years).
This will facilitate the engagement and participation in
policies and decision -
making that directly or indirectly affects the lives of
Indigenous peoples and their ability to exercise and enjoy their human rights.
«However, the lack of reliable and consistent disaggregated data for
Indigenous Australians is striking, resulting in the paucity of evidence - based
Indigenous policy -
making,» she said.
Unlike Gary Banks, I am far from confident that the Report will contribute to better
policy making and improved outcomes for
Indigenous Australians — as demonstrated already by the political posturing by Macklin and Scullion.
Working in the area of translational research with a population health focus, in which it is a world leader, the HealthInfoNet
makes research and other information available in a form that has immediate, practical utility for practitioners and
policy - makers in the area of
Indigenous health, enabling them to
make decisions based on the best available evidence.
Mundine's main messages to the conference were around the coming Federal Budget, saying he was aiming to convince the government not to
make any overall cuts to
Indigenous spending in return for significant savings to come from an «infrastructure audit» and in cutting a swathe through red tape which he says is the «greatest challenge» to
Indigenous health
policy and services.
«At some point, be it researching around
Indigenous health and wellbeing or
policy making around
Indigenous health and wellbeing or trying as a society to reconcile what it is to heal, at some point that conversation about sovereignty and proper recognition will be had.
Overall,
Indigenous Australians have significantly lower access to mental health services, private or public, than other Australians and it thus
makes sound
policy and economic sense that investing in mental health services for
Indigenous Australians should be one avenue to explore through justice reinvestment programs.
If we're going to
make any progress in closing the gap in
Indigenous health outcomes, we're going to have to start addressing the gap that currently exists between the
policies and procedures institutions put in place around cultural safety, and their practices and the lived experiences of
Indigenous people in our hospitals and health services.
However, as is clear from the above discussion, native title has not been fully integrated into government
policy making as a means of harnessing the power of
Indigenous people's identity based on traditional laws and customs to achieve economic and social development.