It is intended that the Assembly shall be recognised as the peak
Indigenous regional body and the primary point of Indigenous community coordination and input, while the Community Working Parties shall be the primary points of Indigenous contact at the community level.
Not exact matches
The largest
bodies were Baptists (in several national or
regional conventions, some of them Negro, for the majority of such Negroes as became Christians were Baptists), Methodists (in more than one ecclesiastical structure, some of them also Negro), the Disciples of Christ (of American origin), the Church of Latter Day Saints of Jesus Christ (Mormons, also sprung from the soil), Christian Scientists (likewise
indigenous), and the Seventh Day Adventists (born in the United States).
The Inquiry was called as a result of pressure from
Indigenous women, family members, Canadian human rights organizations and international and
regional human rights
bodies that found Canada in breach of its international human rights obligations to act with due diligence to prevent violence against
Indigenous women and girls.
Any National
Indigenous Representative
Body will need to be alert to how it can effectively work with the
regional and State / Territory representative
bodies, and the current administration arrangements in place for
Indigenous affairs.
Mechanisms for representing
Indigenous peoples at the
regional level Mechanisms for representing
Indigenous peoples at the state or territory level The National structure of the National
Indigenous Representative
Body
Some options for the National
Indigenous Representative
Body to engage at the
regional and State / Territory level include:
It demonstrates that, particularly at the
regional level, all
Indigenous groups can not be homogenised into a single representative
body, but require distinct representative arrangements.
These lessons learned from previous mechanisms for national
Indigenous representation can help identify what issues need to be discussed when considering the scope of a new National
Indigenous Representative
Body, particularly in relation to the roles and functions of the body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and regional lev
Body, particularly in relation to the roles and functions of the
body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and regional lev
body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and
regional levels.
[211] In June 2005, the then Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and
Indigenous Affairs had confirmed that the government remained committed to establishing representative
bodies at the
regional level:
A National
Indigenous Representative
Body could provide specialist mediation and facilitation assistance to
Indigenous communities in developing community planning processes to be fed into a broader
regional and State / Territory - wide planning process.
Importantly, the new National
Indigenous Representative
Body will have to consider how to interface with this regional body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national le
Body will have to consider how to interface with this
regional body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national le
body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national level.
In announcing the abolition of ATSIC, the government stated its intention to support the creation of a network of
regional representative
Indigenous bodies to interact with governments.
involving
Indigenous peak
bodies,
regional or state / territory based
Indigenous bodies or
Indigenous service delivery organisations in its activities and decision - making
In June 2005, the then Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and
Indigenous Affairs confirmed that the government remained committed to establishing representative
bodies at the
regional level:
Understanding the factors that have been in play in past
Indigenous representative
bodies, in State / Territory and
regional representative
bodies and in
Indigenous representative
bodies overseas highlights what are some of the key issues that should be taken into account when considering possible forms for such a
body.
Some of the ways in which a new National
Indigenous Representative
Body could engage with
Indigenous people, communities and organisations at the
regional and state / territory level, include:
The new arrangements are built on a process of negotiating
regional priorities with
Indigenous representative
bodies as well as negotiating shared responsibility agreements with local communities or groups.
A consistent and «connected» structure, so that there is a clear relationship between the national
body and
Indigenous peak
bodies, service delivery organisations and other representative mechanisms that may exist at the State, Territory or
regional level.
A third, informal and more minimalist option would be for a National
Indigenous Representative
Body to convene
regional forums and planning processes on a regular or cyclical basis.
It will be important for the new National
Indigenous Representative
Body to ensure that clear and consistent mechanisms are in place with the relevant
bodies (i.e. COAG, Ministerial Taskforce on
Indigenous Affairs, Secretaries Group on
Indigenous Affairs, the Office of
Indigenous Policy Coordination and
regional Indigenous Coordination Centres).
formal mechanisms, where the national
body draws its members from national, state / territory or
regional representative
bodies, holds regular state - wide policy forums or develops other
regional - level mechanisms based on boundaries used by the previous ATSIC
Regional Councils or based on
Indigenous geographic regions
Representing
Indigenous people and communities Some of the ways in which a new national
body could engage with
Indigenous people, communities and organisations at the
regional and state / territory level, include:
formal mechanisms whereby a National
Indigenous Representative
Body has components that exist at different levels (such as in each State and Territory and at the
regional level);
Indicating that it will support the creation of a network of
regional representative
Indigenous bodies by 1 July 2005 to interact with the Government and utilising existing ATSIC
Regional Council structures until then;
Could a national
body (without State, Territory or
regional structures) effectively represent
Indigenous peoples through the conduct of participatory processes and engagement (such as issue specific forums and advisory groups,
regional or State / Territory level planning processes, or the convening of a National Congress)?
In this model, organisations, national
Indigenous peak
bodies,
regional and / or state / territory level representative organisations could nominate a delegate / s to represent them in the National
Indigenous Representative
Body.
Should the National
Indigenous Representative
Body just involve a national level structure; or should it also include State and Territory and / or
regional structures?
consistent and «connected» structure — with clear links to
Indigenous peak
bodies and
Indigenous organisations at the state, territory and
regional levels
O'Donoghue's minority report in the Hiatt inquiry aimed to deal with this issue by proposing that the replacement for the NACC should be based in
regional organisations feeding into state advisory
bodies that comprised both
regional Indigenous representatives and state public officials.
The Victorian Aboriginal Affairs Minister announces a series of consultation sessions have been planned for
regional Victoria with a view to establishing a new representative
body for the State's
Indigenous communities.
Should the National
Indigenous Representative
Body be a national - level structure or include state / territory and / or
regional structures?
The range of national, State / Territory, and
regional level outlined above demonstrate that a diversity of
Indigenous representative
bodies is currently in existence in Australia.
This will be important for ensuring consistency between program delivery by these
bodies and the work of the new National
Indigenous Representative
Body, particularly in terms of linking national policy development with
regional level program implementation.
Secondly, the Issues Paper looked at a range of national, state / territory and
regional Indigenous representative
bodies currently operating in Australia including:
State - based mechanisms being a feature of a new National
Indigenous Representative
Body, potentially drawing their representatives from
regional representative mechanisms;
How such an approach would impact on the level of direct engagement with
Indigenous peoples at the
regional level would depend on what other processes for participation existed within the National
Indigenous Representative
Body.
Regional Councils were given the power to formulate a
regional plan for the improvement of the economic, cultural and social status of
Indigenous peoples and to assist ATSIC and other
bodies in its implementation.
Negotiating agreements at the
regional level with the representative
Indigenous body and at the local level with
Indigenous communities.
As noted above,
Indigenous peoples could be represented at a
regional level by a National
Indigenous Representative
Body through the existence of formal structures at the
regional level, or through more informal processes.
One option for a new National
Indigenous Representative
Body would be for it to include formal
regional Indigenous mechanisms based on the same boundaries as the government's
Indigenous Coordination Centres.
I believe that the federal government in particular has been passive on this issue — they have too easily sat back and thrust responsibility for getting
regional bodies in place back to
indigenous communities.
Indeed, in consultations for the Report on greater
regional autonomy it was noted that there was «wide support for the retention of a representative and democratically - elected
body at the national level to address government and to coordinate
Indigenous advocacy».
AIDA is also looking to expand its Associate membership category, to tap into the multiple partnerships that it has with numerous stakeholders and organisations across the country, including medical schools, post-graduate medical educational
bodies,
regional training providers, and
Indigenous and non-
Indigenous health advocacy
bodies.
That's why the importance of having
Indigenous regional engagement
bodies can not be overstated.
However, the Report on greater
regional autonomy found «wide support for the retention of a representative and democratically - elected
body at the national level to address Government and to coordinate
Indigenous advocacy [and]... to provide «balance» between different
Indigenous groups and interests across the country.»
My Office will continue to monitor how mainland Torres Strait Islanders are able to participate in the new arrangements over the coming year, particularly once
regional representative
Indigenous bodies exist.
Where proposals will affect
Indigenous land, contacting: traditional land owners, the Prescribed
Body Corporate (PBC), local branches of Aboriginal Land Councils and the
regional Native Title Representative
Body (NTRB) is vital.
Torres Strait Islander people living on the mainland have been invited to, and participated in, meetings on the new arrangements in
Indigenous affairs, particularly community consultations on new
regional representative
bodies, and will be able to continue their involvement in planning through the new representative mechanisms.
Cultural Awareness - developing a program aimed at encouraging mutual understanding and improved relationships between Victorian
Indigenous communities, NRE and NRE service providers (statutory authorities,
regional bodies, and private providers) and community groups (Coastcare, Coast Action, Landcare, Bushcare, Farmsmart, etc).
The Expert Mechanism engage with other international human rights mechanisms, including the treaty
bodies, as well as with
regional and national human rights
bodies, in particular national human rights institutions and the Working Group on
Indigenous Populations / Communities of the African Commission on Human and Peoples» Rights.