Individual intelligence tests are considered the most accurate measure of intelligence, but even they are not perfect.
While the correlation between group and
individual intelligence tests is quite high for average scores, in this study that correlation almost disappeared for gifted scores.
Not exact matches
The participants of the study were given an
intelligence quotient
test at the median age of 30 years old, as well as providing
individual information about their educational achievements and income levels.
When IQ, or «general
intelligence», is
tested in people,
individuals tend to perform comparably across different types of cognitive tasks — those who do well in one type of task, tend to do well in others.
In other words, a battery of different, well - designed
tests appears to be measuring overall
intelligence rather than simply how well a person does on each
individual test.
He makes a convincing case for incorporating valuable but less easily measured attributes into our view of
intelligence, such as the persistence that can propel driven students to higher
test scores than their less committed peers and the creativity demonstrated by
individuals more in tune with intuition than intellect.
Individual monkeys perform consistently on different
tests of
intelligence — a hallmark of human IQ and, perhaps, an indication that human intellect has an ancient history
Although a total of 502,655 participants took part in Biobank, we focus on 185,317
individuals who have data for at least one wave of fluid
intelligence testing.
Using linear regression, we demonstrate that the multivariate pattern of gray matter density within these brain regions significantly predicts
individual intelligence scores in the remaining, i.e., independent sample used for model
testing (N = 108; correlation between predicted and actual
intelligence scores: r =.36).
Children who are identified for gifted programs or IEP's are often re-tested with an
individual test, either the WISC or Standford Binet
intelligence tests, to have a clearer picture of a child's challenges or gifts.
Psychologists usually prefer one of the
individual tests of
intelligence to identify children for special education services.
And since there's no
individual tester to clarify unusual answers, the gifted kids often score lower on group
intelligence tests.
Some
tests also have a «brief» version that can be administered to an
individual child in 15 - 20 minutes, e.g. the K - BIT (Kaufman Brief
Intelligence Test).
The Wechsler
tests, Wechsler
Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC - IV) and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of
Intelligence (WPPSI - III), and the Stanford Binet (SB - 5) are the most common
individual IQ
tests.
Group
tests are not considered as reliable as
individual tests, and
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores generated by these
tests are not included in confidential student documents, such as an Evaluation Report, because their purpose is screening.
The
Intelligence Tests considered the most reliable are the Stanford Binet and the Wechsler
Individual Scale for Children.
Going even further, given the IQ
test's history of being used to further questionable and sometimes racially motivated beliefs about what different groups of people are capable of, some researchers say such
tests can not objectively and equally measure an
individual's
intelligence at all.
A number of Artificial
Intelligence based products in the marketplace were
tested but they all had a common flaw — they didn't work in the same way as a normal in - house legal team would, instead catering for bulk contract processing and neglecting working on an
individual transactional basis.
By measuring intellect, emotional
intelligence, personality, values, motivators and interests, psychometric
testing is able to identify an
individual's critical strengths and highlights their development needs.
Relevant Proficiencies Web Analytics Tools — Omniture (Sitecatalyst, Discover and Insight), Web Trends, Unica Net Insight, Google Analytics • Website
Testing Tools — Content and Creatives: Omniture
Test & Target, Google Website Optimizer; Tracking Mechanisms: Firebug, Http watch, Httpfox, Charlesproxy • SEO Tool — Web CEO, WebPosition Gold • PPC Tool — Google Adwords (Adwords Qualified
Individual), Yahoo! Search Marketing (Overture) • Display Advertising — Atlas, DoubleClick • Keywords Tool — Word Tracker, Overture Keywords Suggestion, Google Keywords Suggestion • Behavioral Targeting / Personalization —
Test & Target, Web Trends Visitor
Intelligence, BT Buckets • Data Collection — Omniture Excel Client, Web Trends Smart Reports and ODBC Driver, SQL • Data Visualization — SAP Xcelsius, MS Excel, MS Word, PDF • Competitive Analysis Tool • Hitwise, Compete, Alexa, Google Ad Planner • Webs Demography — Hitwise, Google Ad Planner, MSN Ad Lab • Graphic Tools — Macromedia Dream Weaver, Adobe Photoshop 5.0
Technology Web Analytics Tools: Omniture (Sitecatalyst, Discover and Insight), Web Trends, Unica Net Insight, Google Analytics Website
Testing Tool: Content and Creatives: Omniture
Test & Target, Google website optimizer Tracking Mechanisms: Firebug, Http watch, Httpfox, Charlesproxy SEO Tool: Web CEO, WebPosition Gold PPC Tool: Google Adwords (Adwords Qualified
Individual), Yahoo! Search Marketing (Overture) Display Advertising: Atlas, DoubleClick Keywords Tool: Word Tracker, Overture Keywords Suggestion, Google Keywords Suggestion Behavioral Targeting / Personalization:
Test & Target, Web Trends Visitor
Intelligence, BT Buckets Data Collection: Omniture Excel client, Web Trends Smart Reports and ODBC Driver, SQL Data Visualization: SAP Xcelsius, MS Excel, MS Word, PDF Competitive Analysis Tool: Hitwise, Compete, Alexa, Google Ad Planner Webs Demography: Hitwise, Google Ad Planner, MSN Ad Lab Graphic Tools: Macromedia Dream Weaver, Adobe Photshop5.0
While
intelligence as psychological construct is assumed to be stable over time, it has been suggested that WISC - III subtests may be less stable than global IQ (for more information about long - term stability of the WISC - III see Canivez and Watkins 2001; for a general discussion see Moffitt et al. (1993) and repeated verbal IQ
testing during childhood has revealed considerable change within
individuals, reflecting different rates of developmental maturation, and, specifically, language development (Breslau et al. 2001).