Not exact matches
«
Because we believe there is no merit to plaintiff's lawsuit, we are vigorously opposing their
application for a preliminary
injunction and we will demonstrate that the challenged actions were in all respects lawful,» he said.
Speaking to Citi FM's Richard Dela Sky, the lead lawyer for the NPP, Godfred Dame said «we are in court
because the original
application for interim
injunction filed by David Hoezame had been fixed for hearing on September 2, 2014 and we feel like clearly it will not accord with justice and fairness if the
application is heard on that day
because clearly the date postdates the date that has been fixed by the NPP for its special delegates conference.»
[3] Google contends that the
injunction ought not to have been granted
because the
application did not have a sufficient connection to the Province to give the Supreme Court of British Columbia competence to deal with the matter.
This suggests that even if the order is set aside on appeal, Google will suffer irreparable harm as a result of compliance with the court order in the interim,
because its clients will think less of it or
because it is more likely to be the target of
injunction applications.