TY - JOUR AU - 김보람 AU - Kyungsook Lee AU - 박진아 AU - 이지성 TI - The Emotional - Behavioral Characters and Behavior Problems in
Institutionalized Care Children: Focusing on gender differences T2 - The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology PY - 2008 VL - 13 IS - 1 PB - The Korean Society For Woman Psychology SP - 43 - 61 SN - 1229 - 0726 AB - This study examined the institutional children's psychological features as comparing institutional care children with normal children focusing on gender differences.
«The Emotional - Behavioral Characters and Behavior Problems in
Institutionalized Care Children: Focusing on gender differences» The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology 13, no. 1 (2008): 43 - 61.
2008, «The Emotional - Behavioral Characters and Behavior Problems in
Institutionalized Care Children: Focusing on gender differences», The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, vol.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, the tendency among charitable and church - related organizations has been to duplicate tax - supported efforts to
institutionalize and professionalize means of
child care and treatment.
GLEN ELLYN — While President Clinton is calling for more government funding of
institutionalized child care, parents have other ideas about how to best
care for their
children.
The downside voiced by certain critics includes high staff turnover, an «
institutionalized feel» to certain
care facilities, and higher staff - to -
child ratios than many parents would prefer.
In this situation, consider having your
children own the life insurance policy, because, if the parent (s) become
institutionalized, the cash value of this policy will be includable in their assets and may have to be withdrawn, or the policy surrendered in order to pay for long - term
care expenses.
Too many people adopt older
children who have been in
institutionalized care or foster homes with false expectations.
Lack of responsive, contingent, and sensitive
care is one of the most prominent deviations from the expected environment for
institutionalized children, and foster
care placement in BEIP is associated with dramatic improvements in caregiving quality and attachment security (41, 42), both of which might contribute to the intervention effects on stress response system functioning.
Elevated sympathetic tone (i.e., lower resting PEP) was observed among
children in the
care - as - usual group (CAUG) relative to the foster
care group (FCG) and never
institutionalized group (NIG)(see Table S1 for all values of ANS measures and Table S2 for all HPA axis measures).
Institutionalized children are often
cared for inconsistently and do not have the opportunity to develop healthy attachments (McLaughlin, Epsie & Minnis, 2010).
Institutionalized children don't just suffer emotional privation but also poor physical
care such as bad diet and also lack of stimulation.
The partnership will prevent or slow down the number of new
children entering residential
care and strengthen families and caregivers so
institutionalized children can be reintegrated into family
care.
Another research that deserves highlights for revealing data about the
care behavior among
institutionalized children is the research of Cavalcante (2008).
Although an interaction was established between the type of
care (institutional vs. family) and genetic moderation factors, with a protective factor of the 5HTT / allele genotype for high scores on attachment disorganisation in
institutionalized children, the authors noted that it is not clear if genetic factors can protect some
children in adverse environments or if the experience of being raised in these environments can alter the expression of the gene.
The first group comprised
institutionalized children who at the outset of the study were randomly assigned to continue institutional care (CAUG); the second group comprised previously institutionalized children who were randomly assigned at the outset of the study to foster care (FCG); and the third group comprised children from the Bucharest community who had never experienced institutional care [the Never - Institutionalized
institutionalized children who at the outset of the study were randomly assigned to continue institutional
care (CAUG); the second group comprised previously
institutionalized children who were randomly assigned at the outset of the study to foster care (FCG); and the third group comprised children from the Bucharest community who had never experienced institutional care [the Never - Institutionalized
institutionalized children who were randomly assigned at the outset of the study to foster
care (FCG); and the third group comprised
children from the Bucharest community who had never experienced institutional
care [the Never -
Institutionalized Institutionalized Group (NIG)-RSB-.