Interesting take on science, Geesh, considering it's medical science that is keeping your wife from dying.
Not exact matches
Taking IT back to the
science and prove (
science probes, not proves, says Bateson) No matter what the token topics are: it's the argument - going -
on that's most
interesting and maybe most edifying.
Also, being more
interested in
science and facts than ideology, we don't like to
take things at face value based
on what some impassioned but unbalanced individuals may think.
On the contrary, they are as clearly differentiated from
science as we
take them to be, precisely because they spring from an
interest or concern that is more than merely empirical and because the assertions they typically make or imply are not subject to any strictly empirical mode of verification.
When you said you did not want to debate co-sleeping, I
took that literally... that you weren't
interested in debating co-sleeping but rather were opening a conversation
on the topics you raised: that young children need to learn independent sleeping, that
science backs this, and that a mindful parenting routine can accomplish from the start and immediately this without tears.
And while the
science may be disputed, depending on who is funding the study, as to whether commonly used food dyes such as Yellow 5, Red 40 and 6 others made from petroleum pose a «rainbow of risks» that include hyperactivity in children, cancer (in animal studies), and allergic reactions, because of the problem of hyperactivity, the Center for Science in the Public Interest petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to ban the use of these dyes given that the British government and European Unionhave taken actions that are virtually ending their use of dyes throughout
science may be disputed, depending
on who is funding the study, as to whether commonly used food dyes such as Yellow 5, Red 40 and 6 others made from petroleum pose a «rainbow of risks» that include hyperactivity in children, cancer (in animal studies), and allergic reactions, because of the problem of hyperactivity, the Center for
Science in the Public Interest petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to ban the use of these dyes given that the British government and European Unionhave taken actions that are virtually ending their use of dyes throughout
Science in the Public
Interest petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to ban the use of these dyes given that the British government and European Unionhave
taken actions that are virtually ending their use of dyes throughout Europe.
«It's
interesting that the governor said his intention was to
take the emotion out of the process and just rely
on the
science and that's the line that stuck,» said Scott Kurkoski, a lawyer for the pro-fracking Joint Landowners Coalition.
Potocnik is diplomatic when asked if any particular area of
science has caught his
interest since
taking on the research job.
Rather than encouraging researchers to
take on problems that serve the public
interest — a basic function of
science and the fundamental reason that citizens support funding for
science — Edwards believes those «perverse incentives» make researchers cautious and only concerned with their own
interests.
A brand new
science for studying this networked phenomenon, and in effect it's kind of a reverse engineering the World Wide Web that we know and the kinds of networks that we see
on that to try to figure out how they
took shape and maybe from that we can learn what principles involve and how networks do grow and you might be able to use that sort of thing to be able to develop a better system s for example being able to create more efficient networks and that could be very valuable in industry, there may be a lot of practical applications, involving protecting privacy, for example, and stopping people from stealing identities; and you should, you know, should be of just an
interesting phenomenon.
To combine his
interest in research with a wider
interest in
science, Peter Cotgreave took on the directorship of Save British Science, a campaigning organisation that presses the governments in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff, and Belfast for better funding for science, stronger science education in schools, and policies that allow the general public to have greater access to the benefits of scientific and technological re
science, Peter Cotgreave
took on the directorship of Save British
Science, a campaigning organisation that presses the governments in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff, and Belfast for better funding for science, stronger science education in schools, and policies that allow the general public to have greater access to the benefits of scientific and technological re
Science, a campaigning organisation that presses the governments in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff, and Belfast for better funding for
science, stronger science education in schools, and policies that allow the general public to have greater access to the benefits of scientific and technological re
science, stronger
science education in schools, and policies that allow the general public to have greater access to the benefits of scientific and technological re
science education in schools, and policies that allow the general public to have greater access to the benefits of scientific and technological research.
And with McCain's running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, sparking an unprecedented level of
interest in the beliefs and philosophies of a vice presidential candidate, some more populist questions of
science — creationism in the classroom, for example — have
taken on a more direct resonance with voters than usual.
To encourage students to
take an
interest in
science from early
on, the government has begun equipping high schools with biotech laboratories.
Before closing, Holdren
took on concerns expressed by some in the scientific community that participation in the March for
Science will transform science into «just another interest group,» «politicize science» or render scientists as a «group worried about their jobs.
Science will transform
science into «just another interest group,» «politicize science» or render scientists as a «group worried about their jobs.
science into «just another
interest group,» «politicize
science» or render scientists as a «group worried about their jobs.
science» or render scientists as a «group worried about their jobs.»
She hopes her explanation for Santa's stealth delivery system — and therefore his very existence — will inspire children to
take a greater
interest in physics, and put a
science kit
on the list of presents they want in their stockings.
«The thoughts of travel that have long tormented me make me
take a greater
interest in the
sciences with each passing day,» wrote 16 - year - old Albert to his «dear Papa» in 1864, «and I can not wait to surrender myself entirely to my nautical tastes...» Thanks to the Grimaldi bank account, he was able to combine both passions
on a series of four well - appointed yachts.
ISPRA, Italy — The landscape is familiar to
science policy experts
on both sides of the Atlantic: To address serious global problems and to
take advantage of important future discoveries, they will have to work effectively with elected officials and members of the public who have complex and sometimes conflicting values and
interests.
It
took about three years to get there, as the rover was stopping to look at
interesting science targets
on the way.
I came across an
interesting post (thanks Pasco Phronesis) about
science metrics and a discussion
on the subject
taking place
on the Nature website.
Besides the declaration a very
interesting panel discussion
on science education
took place featuring Nobel Peace Prizewinner Kailash Satyarthi, among others.
After Greenpeace revealed that Willie Soon has
taken over $ 1 million in payments from fossil fuel
interests on «research» intended to undermine climate
science, his credibility has evaporated.
Of late, modern day psychology and
science are
taking a renewed
interest in the ancient perspectives
on happiness.
RELATED: Quiz: Your 5 DOMINANT Personality Traits Based
On Pictures You Like Over the course of one study of the relationship... eHarmony experts» take on dating, relationships and the science of love But the benefit, she says, is that Politically Progressive Dating Sites These days, we have thousands of way to make your dating more interesting and impressiv
On Pictures You Like Over the course of one study of the relationship... eHarmony experts»
take on dating, relationships and the science of love But the benefit, she says, is that Politically Progressive Dating Sites These days, we have thousands of way to make your dating more interesting and impressiv
on dating, relationships and the
science of love But the benefit, she says, is that Politically Progressive Dating Sites These days, we have thousands of way to make your dating more
interesting and impressive.
While it might seem more
science - y than magic - y, the Quantum Realm looks like an
interesting crossroads for a new
take on magic that Doctor Strange could provide.
At TeenTech, we reach out to these young people, asking if they are
interested in gaming, social media, or being inventive, and that's why they step forward to
take part in the programme working
on projects to make life «better, simpler and easier» using
science and technology.
It is not uncommon for novice teachers»
interests to be sparked immediately following a course or workshop
on a particular topic, but these teachers had already
taken or were simultaneously
taking with the social studies methods course their other reading, mathematics, and
science teaching methods courses.
on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy Helpful Books for the Writing Process by Michelle Ule
on Books & Such Literary Agency blog 3 Tips for Writing Heavy Emotional Scenes by Jami Gold Don't Cheat the Reader by Sally Apokedak
on Novel Rocket How to Infuse Your Writing with Nostalgia by Frank Angelone
on Copyblogger The Secrets Behind Buried Dialogue: Part One and Part Two by Lynette Labelle Crafting Multi-Layered Characters by Marissa Graff
on Adventures in YA & Children's Publishing Writing Futuristic Fiction in (What Feels Like) a
Science Fiction World by Imogen Howson
on Pub (lishing) Crawl How to Spot Mary Sue in Your Writing by Ava Jae
Taking the Road Less
Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan
on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen
on The Writers In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson
on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson
on Pub Rants Give Characters
Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino
on Moody Writing
This leads nicely into my questions for the site authors: While I understand your
interest in avoiding «political or economic implications», will you be willing to call politicians
on the carpet when they
take stances that contradict well - understood
science?
These are valuable contributions, and open some doors for
interesting new
science (although
on first skim I thought the AMO paper was a good example of this, Tamino's
take - down of it has changed my mind).
Other major democracies (ones with stricter limits
on taking campaign money from special
interests; and ones in which the price of gas has been well over $ 5 / gallon for years) don't seem to have this problem of
science blindness and deer - caught - in - the - headlights inaction.
What if we
take a srep back towards Justin Biddles main point; «There are serious problems..., many of which can be traced to the influence of commercial
interests on research...» and apply it to climate
science.
I haven't seen this yet, and only read the above comments, but it is
interesting that with the lack of many pro-AGW witnesses, it was the Dem senators putting forwards the
science side of the debate, and seemingly holding their own in
taking it to the scientists
on the panel.
Promote the
interests of its member institutions and the larger Arctic research community by
taking positions
on and promulgating position statements about important issues related to Arctic
science;
As I said above, even if (and I'm not saying this is the case) scientists have been poor at communicating this point to the public there is no excuse for anyone who actually
takes an
interest in the subject to the point where they feel competent to make confident pronouncements
on the state of climate
science and the reality or otherwise of (C) AGW not to be aware of it.
It
took a deep understanding of and
interest in the
science, and the politics, and the controversies surrounding them, going right back to the 90s, but with a special focus
on everything touched upon here.
Well, in the
interest of «building bridges», I would like to reach out to «Anders» (or «wotts» or «ATTP» or «MWWPAMMHWTBONTBTISQOPDKOBACWAJLUANUPMWIBAWFPTHMO» or whatever that needy, little drama - green has
taken to calling himself, lately) with a settled -
science, huggle - buggles, luvie - duvie comment, of my own (
on - topic, I might add):.
But luckily the IPCC formally did
take on Lord Monckton publicly proved to all he was a flake who manipulated materials, lied through his teeth, had no basis for his claims, and destroyed his ludicrous reputation across the world as an intelligent human being
interested in the truth of Climate
Science.
Likewise if you are working
on the history of philosophy you might
take an
interest in the rise of religions or
science and turn to either Hegel or Marx with their grand narratives attempting to explain the evolution of human civilization, whereas if you are
interested in the history of philosophy you might consider Frederick Copleston — who is largely just trying to describe in layman's terms and in chronological order different philosophical systems.
The Nature paper is an outstanding piece of work, and contains material which should be
taken on board by everyone
interested in climate
science communication, Real Climate not excepted!
2 comments I found
interesting: — The chief of staff of the House
Science Committee (didn't get his name) pointed out that the defined task
taken on by the committee was different from the task actually requested of NAS by the House
Science Committee.
I'm quite willing to participate in tracing the logic of this puzzle so far as reason can
take us in
science, in the belief that the best of evidence and inference will lead people of good intention to act based
on their traits» survival
interest.
For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public
interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed arguments without social
science evidence to back them up; nor could the court
take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted
on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the arguments.