Sentences with phrase «international rules represent»
«International rules represent thinking.
https://www.si.com/ Not exact matches
These rules represent an international reference point for third countries, by providing the highest levels of consumer protection,» it reiterated this week.
You represent and warrant to Edutopia that (a) you will comply with all applicable local, state, national, and international laws, rules, and regulations in connection with your use of Edutopia Technologies and Edutopia Resources; (b) you have the right to grant to Edutopia the rights granted herein, and you own or have all necessary rights to, title to, and interest in Your Content; (c) Your Content does not and will not (i) infringe, violate, or misappropriate any third - party rights, including any copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, moral rights, privacy rights, rights of publicity, or any other intellectual property or proprietary rights, or (ii) slander, defame, libel, or invade the right of privacy, publicity, or other property rights of any person; and (d) Your Content does not contain any viruses, Trojan horses, or other computer - programming routines that may potentially damage, harm, or otherwise interfere with Edutopia Technologies or access to Edutopia Resources.
In 2013, her colleague Frances Morris, Head of Collections (International Art) at Tate, was quoted in The White Review as saying: «If you implemented a 50 per cent rule in our collection displays, we'd probably be drawing on a fifth of the collection to represent 50 per cent of the display, which would have a grossly distorting effect.»
He represents clients in international arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, with a particular focus on disputes in the oil and gas, power, construction, financial services and telecommunications sectors.
Representing an overseas company in relation to a high value international shareholders» dispute, derivative action and fraud claim brought under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules.
Jamie is a leading member of our International Arbitration Group, having represented clients in ad hoc proceedings and those brought before SIAC, LCIA, ICC, AAA, JAMS, LMAA and under UNCITRAL rules in disputes predominantly in the energy, oil and gas, infrastructure and financial services sectors, often involving emerging jurisdictions, particularly in South - East Asia, India, Africa and Eastern Europe.
Expert witness Juan Mendez, a professor of human rights and international law at the Washington College of Law of the American University in Washington, D.C., and a former United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, testified that the Mandela Rules represent an objective standard for determining whether a person has been subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment; and, he said, «there has been quite a solid consensus that anything beyond 15 days is in violation of international standards... even with mitigating circumstances.»
He has represented parties in disputes before United States courts and before international arbitration panels (under ICC, AAA / ICDR, UNCITRAL and ICSID rules) in a wide range of disputes, including matters in several countries in Latin America and Spain.
Recognized by the Chambers guides as «a crucial figure in the firm's global arbitration practice,» Mr. Pierce represents clients in international arbitration matters in venues around the world, under both civil and common law regimes, and under the rules of all major arbitral institutions.
Mr. Huber has represented clients in international arbitrations sited in both common and civil law jurisdictions under a wide variety of arbitral rules, including the LCIA, ICC, VIAC and AAA.
Mr. Born has represented European, US, Asian and other companies in arbitrations under all leading institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, AAA, Vienna, Stockholm, ICSID) and in ad hoc arbitrations in all leading international seats (London, Paris, Geneva / Zurich, Vienna, Stockholm, New York, Washington, Singapore).
We have extensive experience in complex cross-jurisdictional disputes and our lawyers have represented clients in arbitrations under all the major international rules (ICC, LMAA, LCIA, UNCITRAL, SIAC, CIETAC and HIAC), as well as before commodity trade tribunals (including LME, GAFTA and FOSFA).
She has over ten year's experience of representing clients in complex international arbitrations under many different arbitral rules, as well as in court litigation, adjudication, expert determination and mediation.
Practice Mr. Carter has represented European, US, Asian and other companies in arbitrations under leading institutional rules and in ad hoc arbitrations in all leading international seats.
Timothy represents clients in international arbitrations under the major institutional rules of arbitration such as the SIAC, ICC, UNCITRAL, HKIAC, KLRCA and LCIA.
representing clients in international commercial arbitrations, both in ad hoc proceedings and under all institutional rules
Represented a corporation incorporated in the People's Republic of China against a company incorporated in the United Kingdom in an international arbitration in New York under the ICDR Rules arising from a license agreement to manufacture and sell automobiles in China.
The team notably acted for the Vietnamese government in major international arbitration proceedings and also represented leading energy companies and a top - state - owned enterprise in arbitration under the International Chamber of Comminternational arbitration proceedings and also represented leading energy companies and a top - state - owned enterprise in arbitration under the International Chamber of CommInternational Chamber of Commerce's rules.
Represented Brazilian clients against their Japanese joint venture partner in an international arbitration in New York under the ICDR Rules arising from the exercise of a right of first refusal.
He has more than 35 years of experience representing or counseling parties in relation to international commercial arbitrations under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitinternational commercial arbitrations under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitInternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitInternational Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitInternational Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitration rules.
Perkins Coie represents clients in ad hoc international arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investminternational arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of InvestmInternational Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes.
We are leaders in international construction arbitration and have successfully represented clients throughout North America, Europe and Africa in major arbitrations under various institutional rules and in ad hoc arbitrations.
Our Investor - State arbitration lawyers have successfully represented States in the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, UNCITRAL rules proceedings, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration, the American Arbitration Association, and others.
We represent clients at international arbitrations under NAFTA Chapter 11 investment, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International Trainternational arbitrations under NAFTA Chapter 11 investment, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International TraInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International TraInternational Trade Law rules.
He specializes in international commercial and investment arbitration, and has represented clients under most major arbitral rules systems.
Our New York partners bring you a depth of experience in representing US - based and international clients in international commercial arbitration cases administered under ICDR, UNCITRAL and ICC arbitration rules, as well as ad hoc arbitrations and arbitrator service in complex international commercial cases.
We have successfully represented clients in arbitrations related to projects in North America, Europe, and Africa, under various institutional rules, including the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Alternative Dispute Resolution Chambers (ADR Chambers), ADR Institute of Canada, and ad hoc arbitrations.
In 2008 the US entrepreneur Mr Carl A. Sax, represented by Amsterdam & Partners, brought a claim against the city of St Petersburg, Rossiya Airlines and Pulkovo Airport (co-respondents) in an ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in Stockholm, alleging breaches of the investment contract regarding the development of a new international passenger terminal at Pulkovo International Airport in St Petersburg back international passenger terminal at Pulkovo International Airport in St Petersburg back International Airport in St Petersburg back in the 1990s.
You represent and warrant to Evolution Coaching that nothing submitted by you to the Site shall contain any content which (i) is harassing, libelous, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, inaccurate, or otherwise objectionable, (ii) violates any law, rule, or regulation, (iii) infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or any other right of any entity or person, (iv) encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national, or international law or regulation, (v) advertises or otherwise solicits funds or is a solicitation for goods or services or (vi) encourages the use of controlled substances.