Sentences with phrase «italian flag»

For instance, typing «pizza» yields a pizza, an Italian flag, and what Unicode fittingly calls «face savoring delicious food.»

Opponents of Berlusconi who had gathered outside the court building in Rome waved the Italian flag on learning the judges» ruling, hailing it a triumph for the constitutional principle of equality.

Dr. Curry's been talking about her Italian Flag Model without setting it down in mathematically rigorous terms for three years.

With regards to the «white» portion of the Italian flag, the Tesla document describes the residual uncertainty in the following way:

This is represented visually by the «Italian flag», in which evidence for a proposition is represented as green, evidence against as red, and residual uncertainty is white... As an alternative to the Italian flag representation, the values may be simply represented in the triplet form [evidence for, uncertainty, evidence against].

If we quantify the strength of the evidence and sum across all three kinds then we get the Italian flag.

Perhaps courtrooms should have your Italian flag displayed so that expert witnesses an judges could see it!

JC: I don't think we know; the white part of the Italian flag is very big on this one.

you will recall, I've been waiting for a year now for Curry to explain her muddled and confused approach to probability, in particular her nonsensical «Italian Flag» analysis which she seems to be recasting as «fuzzy logic» (as an aside, I do agree that her logic is fuzzy, but perhaps not in the way she intended).

The Italian Flag on this one is substantially dominated by the white part of the flag; if the authors had better taken this into consideration, they would have spared themselves alot of grief (and incidentally probably much of the publicity).

Michael Tobis I find Curry's «Italian flag» models to be a very helpful mode of trying to convey to the lay public the major «uncertainty» issues involved.

Michael, i am working on the italian flag right now, you are clearly confused by it.

For all the unpleasant things Michael Tobis says about you he does raise some important points regarding your Italian flag analysis.

I will be posting on the Italian flag later this weekend.

May we please see a full Italian Flag analysis of your certainty about these allegations?

Try to identify something that actually appears to support your conclusion, preferably something new that people won't understand (e.g. the Italian flag).

You've picked an odd forum to come out against the Italian Flag Model, and recognizing Uncertainty in Science.

PS I believe you also expressed puzzlement at the Italian Flag references.

There is no way from the term Italian flag that one would geuss someone meant the distinctions between what one does, can and can not know.

Italian flag, I don't remember chastising you, but that may be a matter of interpretation.

Italian flag: green 0 %, white 5 %, red 95 %.

I am not sure about the italian flag, it seems a bit complicated, though I take your point about yes / no questions being too simple.

I think the Italian flag system is prone to different interpretations: E.g. for the statements at hand, as portions attributable to anthropogenic and natural forcing, or as evidence for the statement versus evidence against.

I was going by Judith's original statement (where the Italian flag appears) «evidence for a hypothesis is represented as green, evidence against is represented as red»

Litmus test questions with number scores for responses, or color shades on the Italian flag spectrum are all well and good (and definitely an improvement over the stale dichotomies) but do these have a shot of replacing terms like «skeptic» in popular discourse?

Hence, the Italian flag analysis could represent this in the following way:

In your Italian flag, the green consists of all evidence that ECS is 3 or greater.

Interesting discussion, and I like the Italian flag idea, but I'm not sure you're being entirely objective about how much goes in each segment.

You're trying to encapsulate both the portions attributable (or evidence for / against) AND the overall confidence level in the Italian flag.

To sort through the claims made by both the Daily Mail and Guardian articles, lets adopt the three - valued logic approach of the Italian Flag analysis.

IN light of that, how can you claim an equal amount of evidence in the red (temp increase dominated by natural variability / forcing) and green (temp increase dominated by anthropogenic forcings) part of the Italian Flag?

I'm not sure that the translation to the Italian flag model is valid though.

As an example, lets apply the Italian flag to the issue of attribution of the 20th century warming, specifically the statement by the IPCC:

a) An Irish flag - mostly green b) A Swiss Flag - mostly red but with some white c) A three colour Italian flag (with slightly variable segments) d) A surrender flag - entirely white.

I'll be interested to see how the Italian Flag treats 2 or more rival hypotheses and 2 or more nulls.

A good comment but would prefer these comments about the AGW Hhypothesis to be categorised in terms of the Italian Flag analogy.

As I understood it this was intended to start a discussion on the significance of the current period of no warming using the «Italian flag» analysis.

And such documentation would undoubtedly be enhanced by an «Italian flag» representation of the uncertainties of the relevant data and supporting rationales.

The Italian flag (IF) is a representation of three - valued logic in which evidence for a proposition is represented as green, evidence against is represented as red, and residual uncertainty is represented as white.

While none of these four datasets alone defeats the Endpoint Problem, taken together they greatly reduce the intensity of the red and white while both increasing the intensity of the green and its span on the Italian Flag model.

While that Italian flag may be X %, Y % and Z % green, white and red, while that red is above 15 % and / or the red / white is above 40 %, it makes no sense to talk about any of it with certainty: Every statement — one way or another — should be offered with the level of certainty appended.

That's what this thread is all about: «waving the Italian flag» with relation to the recent temperature «pause», and I think Gary summarized this very well.

What I am trying to do with the italian flag is to emphasize the WHITE area, the uncertainties.

While it does not hurt to frame the questions differently (like the Italian flag diagram), I fear this will not really impact the problem of a very politicized scientific topic.

In my doubt article, i referenced the hurricane link where I introduced the italian flag, with two references.

Finally, there is no mention of the record for Antarctic sea ice extent in the red area of the Italian flag.

I think I've made a genuine effort to meet you half - way, engaging with you on the substance of your posts, and offering my personal blog as a venue for a dispassionate debate of issues with the Italian flag.

The Italian flag is just an absurd representation of uncertainty — James Annan has torn it up several times.

I find their ideas on certainty management to be useful (framing, quality, pedigree, etc, see the Italian flag thread), and I particularly find some of the papers by Jeroen van der Sluijs to be very good.

Secondly, the argument * has not * been carried out in the Italian flag frame in climate science in several instances.