Sentences with phrase «j e»

O B J E C T I V E To obtain a sales account manager or management / supervisory position with a secure corporation that will enable me to fully utilize my 30 + years of transportation and industry logistical knowledge.

Tags for this Online Resume: AS400, Great Plains, Lawson, J E Edwards, Excel, Outlook, Word, ADP, E-Z Labor, Ultipro

AREAS OF EXPERTISE P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T - Identifies and assess opportunities, schedules projects in logical steps and budgets time required to meet deadlines.

J E Hansen 2007 Environ.

M A J E S T I C #AxelHütte #KunsthalleKrems #KHKAxelHütte #Krems #austria #Museum #igersaustria #exhibition #contemporaryart #artist #installationview #photography Christian Redtenbacher

The 3rd time you interrogate him, he'll reveal a password for Metal Gear Acid: «J E H U T Y»

j e a l o u s.

P R O J E C T S: One of the best things in 2015 was that I had the opportunity to work with so many amazing brands.

Authors: M A Thompson, P Scicluna, F Kemper, J E Geach, M M Dunham, O Morata, S Ertel, P T P Ho, J Dempsey, I Coulson, G Petitpas, L E Kristensen

Authors: P Delorme, T Schmidt, M Bonnefoy, S Desidera, C Ginski, B Charnay, C Lazzoni, V Christiaens, S Messina, V D'Orazi, J Milli, J E Schlieder, R Gratton, L Rodet, AM Lagrange, O Absil, A Vigan, R Galicher, J Hagelberg, M Bonavita, B Lavie, A Zurlo, J Olofsson, A Boccaletti, F Cantalloube, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)

One of such polls in the run up to the 2006 NDC congress at Legon claimed it was going to be a split decision between Prof. J E A Mills and Ekwow Spio Garbrah.

April 12 - Casino operator Wynn Resorts Ltd is in talks to sell its partially built Boston Harbor resort to rival MGM Resorts International, the Wall Street Journal reported https://www.wsj.com/articles/wynn-resorts-in-early-talks-to-sell-boston-area-cas i n o - p r o j e c t - t o - m g m - 1 5 2 3 5 5 6 1 6 5?

They are often dactylic: eg JER e my; AN ge la; (my own: JO se phine)- JENN i fer; PAM e la; JESS i ca; OL i ver; PERFORMANCE POEM: Do get your children to perform this poem.

Not exact matches

Essar Steel is among a dozen https://www.reuters.com/article/india-bankruptcy/indias-bhushan-essar-steel-amon g - 1 2 - f i r m s - b e i n g - m o v e d - t o - i n s o l v e n c y - c o u r t s - s o u r c e s - i d U S L 3 N 1 J D 3 3 F of India's biggest debt defaulters that were pushed into the bankruptcy court last year after a central bank order aimed at clearing record bad loans at the country's...

Its options include (a) cut marginal rates from -0.1 % to a more negative overnight rate target (b) increase purchases in one or several asset classes from current levels (JPY80trn annual in JGB's; JPY3trn in ETF's; JPY90bn in J - REITS)(c) further lengthen the average maturity of holdings (on average somewhere between 5 and 7 years by our estimates)(d) apply forward guidance with respect to its balance sheet or (e) an extreme derivative of (d)-RRB- espouse a «helicopter drop» strategy, wherein the BOJ offers unlimited monetisation of government debt.

Janet E Smith is a professor of moral theology and the Fr Michael J McGivney chair of life issues at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan.

But the chapter defies literary classification, betraying none of the common characteristics of J or P or E; all attempts to give positive identification to the kings named in vv.

When given written form, the J version represented the peculiarities of the southern story, E, those of the northern account.

The usual explanation is that the present form of the narrative is a combination of J and E; and it is common to illustrate the alleged interweaving of the two accounts in an analysis of the first chapter in the tale, chapter 37.

The two accounts, J and E, both draw from a common oral source, or, still as oral tradition, the Joseph story circulated simultaneously in central and southern Canaan.

Horus: Egyptian, 6000 BC Dionysus: Greek, 1500 BC Attis: Greek, 1200 BC Mithra: Zoroastrian, 600 BC Krishna: Hindu, 400 BC Jesus: Christian, 30 AD A) Born on Dec. 25 — Horus, Attis, Krishna, Dionysus, Mithra, Jesus (by way of plagiarizing a Pagan holiday B) Virgin Birth — Horus, Attis, Krishna, Dionysus, Mithra, Jesus C) Sign of Star in the East — Horus, Krishna, Jesus D) Adorned by 3 Kings — Horus, Jesus E) Teacher at age 12 — Horus, Mithra, Jesus F) Ministry started at 30 — Horus, Jesus G) 12 Disciples — Horus, Mithra, Jesus H) Traveled with Disciples Performing Miracles — Horus, Krishna, Dionysus, Mithra, Jesus I) AKA The Truth, the Light, God's Shepherd — Horus, Dionysus, Mithra, Jesus J) Betrayed — Horus, Mithra, Jesus K) Crucified — Horus, Attis, Mithra, Jesus L) Buried 3 days — Horus, Attis, Mithra, Jesus M) Resurrected — Horus, Attis, Krishna, Dionysus, Mithra, Jesus

Certainly the J and E writers and their successors who made so much of the idea did not create it out of pure imagination.

One solution might be that the J - E stories of Abraham represent a little - known tradition which only through the growing prestige of the proto - Pentateuch won general acceptance about the time of the Exile, but familiarity with the story of Jacob was somewhat old.

When we recall that Hosea lived not long after the ascribed dates of composition of the J and E documents, the situation becomes relatively clear.

Either it was Moses, or it was J, E, P, and D. End of discussion.

But try as I might, I just can't believe that the Five Books of Moses were written by J, E, P and D — the four main authors whose oral traditions, biblical scholars say, were cobbled together to make the Torah.

J, E, D, and P write the first five books of the Bible?

The «E» stories are not usually so forceful as the «J,» but they have a smoother literary style.

How did the «J» and «E» manuscripts become merged?

While these books are not as great history or literature as the David stories or the writings of «J» and «E,» they are our chief source of information as to what happened between the return from exile in 538 B.C. and the rise of the Maccabees in 168 B.C..

This question was answered in 1983 by the lunar calculations of Colin J Humphreys and W Graeme Waddington, Oxford University, and refined and confirmed in 1989 by Bradley E Schaefer of NASA / Goddard Space Flight Centre, now Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics at Louisiana State University.

Sometime between that date and the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C., some editor or editors wove «J» and «E» together to form a consecutive narrative.

7 Since for our purposes here the question is not of crucial moment, we shall accept in general, as we have in the preceding essays, the now conventional view of the entity and relative dating of the documents in the order J, E, D, H, P. recognizing with Bentzen, op.

By the turn of the last century, a three - source hypothesis (J, E and P) in Genesis was thought to be in its major lines and by its major proponents at least as well - established as the Copernican theory.

Along more conservative lines, a distinguished German scholar, Martin Noth, has recently proposed and presented evidence for a more ancient source than J (he does not commit himself as to whether it was an oral or written source) underlying both J and E and utilized by both.

There are fascinating and meaningful stories in the J, E, D, and P documents and the postexilic short stories, great devotional passages in the Psalms, substantial wisdom literature, and as we have seen, significant structures in Israel's law.

The scene is Horeb (E and Deuteronomy) or Sinai (J and P).

This is followed by a Chronology Chart where all the proper dates are set out: J, the E revision, the notorious P text, the Redactor, Canonization, and so forth.

There is repeated evidence through this section of material from the three «sources» J, E, and P.

Horeb, the mountain of God (according to E and the Deuteronomic editors), is the same as Sinai, the sacred mountain (J and P), which was the site of Israel's first formal act of Covenant organization.

Or it may have been that in the long process of preserving the tradition an original «J» decalogue, very closely parallel to the «E» decalogue of Exodus 20.

Thus, if we use the now standard symbol of «J,» «E,» and «P» to designate the three most conspicuous narrative strands inter-woven in Exodus (as well as in Genesis and Numbers), we will think of «J» as the recording of early traditions which remained current and fluid down to the tenth century B.C., when the J - work was done by a single man (in this respect probably unique among the three primary sources).

32 - 34; «J») which preserved a ritual decalogue, and a somewhat later version («E,» having its place of origin in the north) which associates the ethical decalogue with the Covenant of the sacred mountain.

The author clarifies the use of the three source hypothesis — J, E and P, and stresses the connection of the Exodus and the torah in the development of Israel, and the deep relationship between the Exodus story and Christianity.

The earlier foundational writer is not J, as Wellhausen suggested, but rather the voice of pious obedience and transcendent understanding of God (found outside the J texts in E and P).

The fact remains, however, that the whole point of translating and material and no other — even down to the splitting of verses between J and another source, generally E or P — is postulated on this particular critical theory being correct.

Appropriately, then, the section closes (and the J - E or non-priestly stratum of Exodus, since 35 - 40, like 25 — 31, is exclusively of priestly quality) with this almost fabulous tribute by tradition — which is, of course, the tribute of all Israel — to Moses.

As priests have employed older sources, including their own, in the Tetrateuch, so deuteronomists have worked (and apparently more self - assertively than the priests) with the likes of J and E, and their own Deuteronomy, in the Deuteronomic Work.

3 - 34, J) which «remembers» a ritual decalogue, and a somewhat later version (E, having its locus in the North, not the South as J) which associates the Ethical Decalogue with the covenant of the sacred mountain.

E continues to require symbolization, whether or not it ever existed as a separate and roughly parallel source to J, as simply that hexateuchal material differing from or later than J but earlier than D or P. Cf. Gerhard von Rad, Genesis, translated by John H. Marks (from Dos erste Buch Mose) in the series Dos Alte Testament Deutseh, II (Gottingen, 1955; Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1961), pp. 23 if.