Hell, after the should - have - been strike out / throw out double play yesterday, Fran turned and practically grabbed de
Jesus by the shoulders to presumably express disdain for the call.
Not exact matches
If those opinion turn out to be support for those who are downtrodden and oppressed
by the religious (the
Jesus - like part), then you (a Christian)
should be the last to object and take it personally.
They are ones we
should be aggressively pursuing with Christ in our hearts, so that the love and grace of
Jesus being real and here on earth right now, can not be ignored
by the people who may be on the fence with who
Jesus is and IF he is, and especially not
by the unbelievers who happen to walk through the doors.
So,
by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change
Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired
by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
This is a sacrament and
should be observed with the highest regard to its ultimate purpose as taught
by Jesus himself.
As for the argument that we
should look to our churches... the BILLIONS spent
by organized religion to build exorbitant places of worship (
Jesus preached in open fields and I'm confident that God hears MY prayers in the privacy of my home) and the building of health clinics in third world countries would help a lot — but they are not inclined to help those in need HERE!
These beliefs are apparently the ones set forth
by Messrs. Johnson, Hoge, and Luidens in «Mainline Churches: The Real Reason for Decline» (FT, March 1993): (1) That Christianity is the only religion with a valid claim to truth, (2) that persons can be saved only through
Jesus Christ and otherwise go to hell, and (3) that therefore one
should try to convert others to the Christian faith.
I guess
Jesus should have been bent out of shape for not getting subsidized
by the Emperor Augustus.
That
should speak volumes to its If you take one moment and give consideration to this one thought — If
Jesus Christ is not real, why are people offended
by His name?
«It would have been perfectly proper,» Wood begins
by insisting, «if Mailer had knocked
Jesus off his throne, as a serious writer
should try to do.
You
should do a study on what
Jesus meant
by lust.
The point of this is that
Jesus in his quality as human being had no control on his birth at all, where and
by whom he
should get born.
Blessed are the Cheesemakers You
should more impressed
by the fact you just expressed
Jesus to be of form and substance more like God than scientifically provable organic matter that existed and is falsifiable.
Acts 4:27 - 28 further reveals that the actions of Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Gentiles, and the people of Israel had been determined and decreed
by God Himself to occur as they «gathered together against»
Jesus and did «what your power and will had decided beforehand
should happen.»
Claiming Romney and members of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints are non-Christians is an insult and it
should not be encouraged
by other Christian clergy as is so often is.
But the kind of abject poverty that over one billion people endure — those living on $ 1 per day — wouldn't be tolerated
by Jesus and
should not exist today.
We are told many hard things
by Jesus most involving kindness and how we
should treat one - another.
It was predicted that
Jesus should be born
by a virgin.
They discredit what
Jesus said in Mark 16:16 ``... and is baptized will be saved,»
by saying that because some of the earliest manuscripts did not have Mark 16:9 - 20, therefore Mark 16:16
should not be included in the Bible.
For how old Hinduism is... shouldn't it be growing instead of dwindling if it were the one guided and guarded
by Jesus Christ?
Jesus also promoted the idea that all men
should castrate themselves to go to heaven: «For there are eunuchs, that were so born from their mother's womb: and there are eunuchs, that were made eunuchs
by men: and there are eunuchs, that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake.
Simply put, the beliefs and understandings that directly affect our salvation are the essentials (
Jesus, His divinity, His death and Resurrection for the forgiveness of our sins, our ability to be in relationship with God through His Son and Spirit and how our life
should be lived as taught
by the Bible etc.).
Don't get me wrong, you can't be a full believer in the bible (since it is written
by people who lived hundreds of years after
Jesus died, and edited throughout the Middle Ages
by terrible people), but that
should not prohibit you from believing in
Jesus or God.
We
should do whatever we can to alleviate the sufferings of others, but
Jesus also invites us to «take up our cross» each day and follow him
by making our lives a sacrifice of love to God's glory and in the service of others.For more information see our video on Suffering.
We
should do whatever we can to alleviate the sufferings of others, but
Jesus also invites us to «take up our cross» each day and follow him
by making our lives a sacrifice of love to God's glory and in the service of others.
Is there something in our communication in church, society and culture, which we
should have clocked
by now — something about how
Jesus structured his communication to trigger his listeners» brains?
Jesus is the re-enactment of the «root out of dry ground» of Isaiah 53 who has «no form or comeliness that we
should look at him, and no beauty that we
should desire him» — who is «despised and rejected
by men.»
What we read in the Old Testament
should not be interpreted as God's approval of such crimes against the human person, but rather we
should see how far humanity had to mature, be healed and be guided
by God in these times before
Jesus Christ's revealing and redeeming work for us.
This was simply the culmination of the way
Jesus lived: he never dressed as we think a king
should, or did things properly
by our standards.
The reader
should not, then, be disturbed
by Jesus» response to the urgent message about Lazarus's illness (11:3 - 6):
Jesus stayed two days longer where he was.
That Luke did so
by replacing this cry with a statement of exemplary piety
should not tempt us away from the paradox of the Markan and Matthean reports, which invite us to affirm that God was present although not even
Jesus could see that this was so.
So we argue and condemn people over the issue of infant baptism vs. adult baptism, baptism
by sprinkling vs. baptism
by immersion, and whether a person
should be baptized in the name of
Jesus vs. in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Very impressed that you will speak out against adultery
by remarriage, or adulterous behavior, even more than you speak out against homosexual marriage and / or homosexual behavior... after all, the direct words of
Jesus should carry far more impact than just the words of Paul or Moses, right?
Pictures of the terror
by which rulers in the ancient world sought to maintain their authority ought not to be applied to God's exercise of his rule and
should not, in my opinion, be used to suggest that
Jesus taught that the wicked would burn for ever in hell.
From prison he sends to
Jesus to ask him if he really is the promised one sent
by God or if he and the people
should wait in expectation of another.
And when I live
by faith — I choose to follow
Jesus from my heart — not just live
by rules of my mind or what
should be done.
In an attempt to follow
Jesus» instructions, many parents and churches teach (usually
by example) that every prayer
should conclude with the words ``... in
Jesus» name, Amen.»
Lord
Jesus, I am willing to be possessed
by you, to be bound to your body and led
by its inexpressible power towards those solitary heights which
by myself I
should never dare to climb.
The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I
should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of
Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in
Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of
Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of
Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of
Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited
by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.
If people want to do something evil, they
should just do it, rather than claiming
Jesus told them to, or
by trying to make it seem not so bad because they are doing it for
Jesus.
As noted
by others here,
Jesus does not explicitly teach about beastiality, rape or incest, yet
should we conclude that «the jury is out» on these behaviors?
With all their laudable effort to understand the integrity of the Scriptures, both Old and New, and to insist on the basic unity of the Bible; with all their recognition of the place of
Jesus within the setting of Jewish piety and religious thought, these scholars sometimes fail to see that the very truth about God which the Bible as a whole affirms, and above all that which the New Testament says about
Jesus himself, can be smothered
by sheer biblicism and thereby made meaningless for those to whom the gospel
should be a living, vitalizing, and contemporary message.
Stupid things such as, «
Jesus wants me to be rich», «the Earth is 6000 years old and every human is descended from Adam and Eve», and «my ignorant beliefs
should be imposed on everyone
by the government, as long as I don't have to pay for it.»
Someone who has been changed
by the indescribable measure of
Jesus» grace
should have different goals than someone who hasn't.
It
should be mandatory that every person who knows they are dying truly gets to understand what
Jesus teaches and weren't conned (or, don't care)
by some false preacher / teacher discussing man made lies..
while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he
should know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of life is the commandments given
by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person
should be put to death, as far as
jesus and the apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.
Despite John's protests that John
should be baptized
by Jesus, not the other way around, he submitted to
Jesus» request.
In the words of Swiss liturgical theologian J. J. von Allmen, «Christian prayers must not express any statement or wish, but
should be controlled
by what we know of God's will revealed in
Jesus Christ.»
This is not what
Jesus preach to everyone and is definately not the lifestyle that we
should live
by.
They may or may not receive the glory that belongs to God alone
by not doing these things openly in the name of
Jesus who is the author of the good works He ordained that we
should walk in.